New: Today the Whig Standard runs this story about yesterday's proceedings.

Which beats the pants off the transcript of CKWS-TV's report from outside the courtroom.

Today is the first time EVER that the Whig has reported on the apparent web of influence involving Harvey Rosen, Martin Skolnick, and John Wright, the owner of both KROCK and Kingston Marina, the original proposed site of the LVEC.

What's also embarassing is, despite being a major player in all this, neither Mr Skolnick's name nor the name of the real-estate firm where he works appear on the list of donors to the LVEC. That list hasn't been updated since May 7th, and at that time the fundraising campaign was over $700,000 short of its meagre nominal target.

Here are pictures of The Rosen Building at 863 Princess Street.

Below are its roadside sign and the directory inside.

Related: Rick Downes steps-up on Mayor Rosen's apparent conflict of interest about Anglin Bay.

Anglin Bay was supposed to be the LVEC's location between March 2004 and November 2005. That property is directly connected to the owner of the K-ROCK radio station.

Today The Whig finally reports on Rick Downes' 3-week old legal action: "Legal challenge calls for mayor's job" is the Whig's headline which is somewhat misleading.

Related: The Mayor, KROCK, John Wright, and Anglin Bay - a pecuniary interest? from February 11th 2008.

Jamie Swift has written an insightful piece titled The decline of the Kingston Whig-Standard, with the subheading "New Editor also serves on the Kingston Chamber of Commerce".

The Whig's publisher is Ron Laurin. And reporters have even been told by the publisher how to compose their stories. A case in point: On November 28, 2007 Laurin sent a memo to then-editor Christina Spencer instructing his underlings how to describe Kingston's controversial downtown arena, a pet project of the city's business elite.

"We need to discontinue our practice of referring to our City's new Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre as an arena," wrote Laurin.

This is an ad man's perspective. It's all about branding. Understandable, if you see a local paper simply as a promotional vehicle for pet projects of the booster boys. But troublesome if you're a journalist who values the integrity of your craft.

Read the whole thing, originally published by The Straight Goods.

Spot the cluster. Now add the Downtown Action Plan that systematically pumps millions into the Downtown, year after year, with no effective end in sight.

Looking ahead, Pin 7 "Police station" conveniently vacates public land next to the LVEC. How do you expect that to go?

Also in the near-term: Marinas, specifically Confed. Who, we wonder, is potentially first-in-line for that? More focus downtown.

And downtown Kingston? nearly zero money down, and not stepping-up to its responsibilities because, with Harvey Rosen for Mayor, they don't have to.

Remember this whenever you hear Ed Smith or Harvey Rosen (also here) play the "parochial" card, and when you hear some people praise the Mayor.

Michael Davies, very evidently, has an edifice complex.

I will go on record that Rosen's performance as mayor is unparalleled for the last 50 years.

Now read this sharp retort from former Kingston mayor Isabel Turner.

Judge for yourself.

While we are on the subject, here's a backgrounder on Michael Davies relating to Harvey Rosen and the LVEC:

• It would appear that Mr Davies is a double-dip donor to Harvey Rosen's 2006 Election Campaign. He's listed personally ($250) and through Nenny Limited ($750), itemized on Rosen campaign disclosure documents at the same residential address. Follow the money.

• Michael Davies was front-and-centre in the list of the so-called "Friends of the Entertainment Centre" who wanted the LVEC built on Anglin Bay, thereby forcing the closure and/or relocation of a marina and MetalCraft Marine, Kingston's very successful, high-tech high-speed boat manufacturer that employs 70 skilled workers.

• Michael Davies was among the prominent participants of the Imagine Kingston lunch, which was hastily convened in mid-May 2006 to manufacture the pretense of public support for in advance of a crucial LVEC-related council vote. Once the Council vote passed on May 30th 2006, nothing much was heard again from this particular group.

  This exercise in political manipulation by Mr Davies and the Downtown Kingston power network was, in the end, scandalously hollow, and has left subsequent councils, and taxpayers, to pick-up the pieces. This aspect is shamefully misrepresented by Michael Davies in his most recent letter.

Related: We've lamented Kingston's edifice complex before.

Here's an interesting article by a concert promoter describing the exasperation involved in trying to book the K-Rock Centre (LVEC). It's apparently not just the LVEC, but other Kingston venues too.

He was trying to book Faber Drive, a 2008 Juno-award nominated band from Mission BC, one of Much Music's most-aired Canadian bands during the past couple of years. The band has recently performed in Cornwall and Brockville.

The fact that they are not answering requests should be very disturbing for the taxpayers of Kingston, considering every paid event at the K-Rock Centre is an important part of the arena's financing plan. Continuous rental of the facility for shows and sporting events means councilors won't have to dip into city reserves to pay the mortgage on the $46.5-million centre, or possibly even raise taxes. The City of Kingston better make some changes, and quickly, if this facility is going to be self-sustaining.

Updated: Check out the related comments online while you still can.

Today the Whig reports that Engelbert Humperdinck has cancelled.

Above: what City Staff is reporting this week.

Above: The deal with KAP is over 40-years, with ZERO up-front.

Above: KAP and its LVEC deals: apparently "in" so long as they don't arbitrarily decide to disband.

There's another LVEC Report from Staff in this week's Council package.

This isn't the first time we read in a report from City Staff that private-sector LVEC fundraising is apparently close to the 90% mark. That's because the contributions from the Downtown Kingston BIA and the Kingston Accommodation Partners are presented (and lauded) by City Staff at full face-value even though these contributors have, in fact, paid next-to-nothing so far for the LVEC even though the building is fully built.

For example, here's a link to the May 20 2006 agreement between The City of Kingston and Kingston Accommodation Partners for $3M in LVEC funding. The agreement covers a period of 40-years (!) with KAP paying absolutely nothing up-front. In fact, it amounts to Kingston Taxpayers shouldering an unsecured 40-year loan on behalf of KAP.

KAP Payments so far: $38,620 in principal, and $360,932 in interest.

Understand that $38,620 is just 1.29% of $3 Million. KAP still owes over $2.96 million, and that's completely unsecured.

Also, understand this about KAP:

• KAP is simply a very loose affiliation of some (but not all) of Kingston's hotelliers.
• KAP could be dissolved in short order on any pretext.
• The agreement does not prescribe LVEC liability to individual KAP members.

Yet City Staff presents this at full face-value when, evaluated objectively in financial securities' terms, it's probably below "junk" status except that, with a junk bond, you get a premium interest rate, which isn't what taxpayers are getting here.

It's certainly obnoxious that Kingston's hotelliers are constantly given credit for $3M for the LVEC when, in fact, they've paid just 1.29% of that so far even though the building is already built.

We emphasise: KAP contributed no money up-front, and the agreement KAP negotiated for itself using its systemic political-insider status puts NONE of the LVEC's financial risk on KAP. Kingston taxpayers don't even get a premium for shouldering all the risk on KAP's $3M promise.

It's basically a similar story with the Downtown Kingston BIA:

• The BIA has a long-term deal with zero money up-front resulting from its systemic policy-insider position.
• BIA LVEC payments are back-end loaded, so the BIA has paid even less than the measly $38,000 in principal that KAP has paid so far.
• There is evidently NO formal mechanism in place to ensure that taxpayers don't eventually pay for all the other things the BIA should, according to the Municipal Act, be paying for in the future.

So in reality LVEC fundraising is nowhere near "the $8M goal outlined in the financing portion of the (LVEC) business plan". Sub-junk grade securities are being presented at full-face value to Council by City Staff grown accustomed to developing and reporting without oversight or consequence to docile Councils.

Despite the clear mandate granted at the November 2006 municipal election, this council has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to remedy the LVEC's financial risk profile, and has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to sanction Staff for these blatant face-value misrepresentations of the LVEC to the citizens of Kingston. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Above: KAP's payment schedule. Total so far: just $38,620 in principal, and $360,932 in interest on its debt, which is carried without any risk premium by municipal taxpayers.

Deri (Frederick) Fairman, Professor Emeritus at Queen's University, co-founder of Citizens for Responsible Development in Kingston, and a pioneer in using of the internet for protest movements in Kingston, passed away on February 26th. He was 72-years old.

Our tribute.

Apparently Engelbert Humperdinck's people aren't quite sure which arena in Kingston he's supposed to be playing, what it's called, or where it's located.

It's a good thing Kingston has professionals like Arcturus SMG managing, booking, and promoting the LVEC / K-Rock Centre.

There are still many notable names AWOL from the LVEC's fundraising donor list, and several of those listed, including hockey team owners, parking lot owners, hotel owners, and some restaurant and bar operators are apparently in for peanuts relative to the taxpayer subsidy of their businesses that the LVEC represents.

The fundraising campaign is still over $800,000 short of its wholly unspectacular nominal target.

Here are stories from CKWS-TV News and The Whig about two of the K-Rock Centre's upcoming concerts being cancelled for lack of interest. Englebert may soon be cancelled as well.

What does this mean, in practical terms?

So much for all the great acts passing-us-by on the 401.

Apparently those who bought tickets online are on-the-hook for the service charges. That will go-over well.

Back in December 2006, KCAL issued a news item titled LVEC red-flag: The LVEC / KRSEC brand in peril about how Mayor Harvey Rosen had completely screwed-up the building's image long before it opened.

The Mayor recently had the temerity to publicly blame the LVEC's marketing woes on the Kingston Frontenacs, which tells us plenty about what kind of person the Mayor is.

The non-refundable service charges for cancelled events just makes marketing the K-Rock Centre harder because it frustrates many of the building's few remaining believers. How dumb is that?

We've just updated the KCAL page on Flickr with photos of the trucks from Disney's High School Musical festooning the streets all around the LVEC.

We've also preserved screen-shots of various LVEC-related websites on Flickr so we can compare, in the future, what City Staff were saying in the light of what the LVEC is actually turning out to be. KCAL's home page is included in this set of screen captures.

KCAL's page on Flickr is a good place to look if, for whatever reason, you need LVEC-related photos and diagrams.

On March 3rd 2008, CKWS-TV news broadcast this news item (transcript) that claims:

... HOCKEY FANS APPEAR TO BE FILLING THE SEATS.

THE O-H-L TEAM SOLD JUST OVER 4-THOUSAND TICKETS FOR BOTH HOME GAMES, ON FRIDAY AND SUNDAY, AT THE DOWNTOWN KINGSTON SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE.

IT'S AN ENCOURAGING SIGN -- SINCE THE TEAM LIKELY WON'T MAKE THE PLAYOFFS THIS YEAR, AND THE CITY IS COUNTING ON HOCKEY GAME REVENUES TO HELP PAY DOWN THE ARENA'S DEBT.

JEFF STILLWELL

"WE ARE OVER 17 THOUSAND FANS IN 4 HOME GAMES.

But everyone tuning-in on COGECO-TV 13 could clearly see the sea of empty seats for both those home games.

It's one thing to parrot a number of tickets distributed or sold, a number supplied by the Kingston Frontenacs. It's quite another to mislead the public into believing there was anywhere close to that number actually in attendance, or that money is flowing-in from ticket sales. It's tickets sold and bums-in-seats that generate the revenues that are critical to the LVEC business plan.

Here's what a long-time season-ticket holder had to say about Friday night's game:

CKWS-TV should be ashamed. They are not alone; CFLY-FM has been parotting the same thing on-air.

Related: Julie Brown: powder puff.

No surprise here. The westsport blog reports on the awful state of affairs outside the LVEC yesterday.

Yesterday, there were 7 trailers parked on the streets around the LVEC, either unhitched or waiting (idling) with their tractors. Unhitched trailers were/are in the on-street spots on Place d' Armes at the corner of Wellington, on both sides of King Street between Queen and Barrack, on Barrack Street in front of the Food Basics, across the main Barrack Street doors of the LVEC, on the north side of the facility (where the team buses have been idling for extended periods of time).

To access the building's unloading area, these 18 wheelers drive into the stub of King Street north of Place d'Armes; they idle there till a worker comes from the lvec to "direct" them as they back into the building. As they back into the building, traffic coming off the Causeway piles up past Fort Frontenac toward the bridge.

That's only one snippet. Read the whole thing.

Updated:: CKWS-TV News covered the story.

Here's a show that won't "pass-us-by" on the 401. The Impact World Tour is booked into the LVEC for 4-nights in early April for 4 free shows.

Here's a link to the Impact World Tour media release.

All of the IWT teams are made up of volunteer Christian performers from across the world, sharing a positive message of hope and destiny with their audiences.

Teams will also be going into schools and detention centres to challenge young people with their anti-drug and alcohol messages and encouraging them to live their lives to their full potential.

Hands-up if you think Kingston will be getting the $2 per ticket which it is due under the LVEC's business plan.

Here are links to stories from the past week.

• On Feb 26, The Whig's editorial lauds Rob Baker. The Tragically hip played just one show, not several that they could have sold-out, and it was a fundraiser for pet-charities, not fundraising for Rob Baker's LVEC.
• Also on Feb 26, according the Whig: Councillors not concerned by low attendance at Frontenacs' game. The Frontenacs drew just 2,283 fans to their second game in the LVEC, on a Sunday afternoon.
• Feb 27 letter in The Whig by Chris Morris: Parking doesn't seem scarce.
• Feb 27 a construction worker who was imported from Oakville writes: Your K-Rock Centre is no longer in my care. Thanks.
• Feb 28 letter to the Whig Editor: Show some respect for the M-Centre.
• Feb 28 letter to the Whig Editor: Expect more empty seats.
• Feb 28 Whig column by L.W. Oakley: Our new centre was rocking.
• On February 29th in The Whig: Fronts taken to task over marketing; Mayor says club's promotion efforts 'amateurish' in nature". Nevermind that this problem has been evident for years and the Mayor was fully aware of it. The LVEC's process railroad completely ignored this risk. Prior to the closing-game of the Memorial Centre, the Frontenacs had sold-out just once in seven years.
• March 3rd letter to The Whig Editor: Frontenacs longtime fans abandoned, partly in response to L.W. Oakley's Feb 29 column "Our new centre was rocking".
• March 3rd Whig Editorial: Hockey team feeling the heat, again the this problem has been evident for years and The Whig systematically ignored it through the LVEC's railroading process.

A long-time season-ticket holder chimes-in:

This letter is from Bruce Todd about the LVEC's opening-night hockey game on February 22 2008.

From: Bruce Todd

To: KCAL@yahoogroups.com

CC: PNichols@cityofkingston.ca, "Morris, Malcolm", "Laubenstein, Glen", "Hurdle, Lanie", Deanna Green, Chris Sleeth, Councillor M Gerretsen, Councillor B Glover, Councillor D Hector, Councillor R Hutchison, Councillor J MacLeod-Kane, Councillor R Matheson, Councillor L Osanic, Councillor S Meers, Councillor E Smith, Mayor H Rosen, Councillor L Foster, Councillor S Garrison, Councillor V Schmolka, "Beach, Cynthia"

Subject: February 22 LVEC observations

Date: 25 February 2008, 02:04:30

I went downtown around 5:30 p.m. last Friday night and observed the downtown before and after the OHL game that drew a crowd of 5,700. There were opening ceremonies at 6:00 p.m. and people were lined up along Barrack Street from the entrance westerly to the Food Basics parking lot. Signs were erected at public parking lots indicating the LVEC parking rates came into force at 5:30 p.m. I asked the Anglin Lot parking attendant how they were handling those cars/people who were still parked in the lot from prior to 5:30 p.m. They said that they didn't know. I assume there is some lost revenue here.

On-street parking was fully utilized at 6:00 p.m., although there were a few cars that pulled away, leaving the parking spot to be quickly taken again. I am sure there had to be an economically detrimental effect on other downtown businesses whose customers could not find on-street parking.

I noticed a lot of "illegal" on-street parking in signed no-parking zones. I understand from others that tow trucks were kept busy. I witnessed a tow from the Tim Horton's parking lot on Ontario Street around 6:30 p.m.

Many people took advantage of the on-street parking through the residential area north of Barrack Street and west of Rideau Street. In fact, cars were parked on both sides of Bay Street west of Rideau Street, and therefore there was not enough room for opposing vehicles to pass each other. Vehicles had to back up out of Bay Street onto Rideau Street in order to continue their journey, and I held my breath as many cars backed out into the very busy intersection of Rideau and Bay. Fortunately, the snow banks had been cleared from many of these streets.

Traffic was tied up on Barrack Street at the entrance to the Liquor Store as the store's parking lot could not handle the inbound flow of traffic, so people sat on the street with their turn signals blinking, and through traffic was blocked in both directions. I am assuming that this situation occurred because there was no on-street parking available, and Liquor Store patrons were not going to pull into a public parking lot and pay a hefty parking fee.

I assumed that most people who were going to the game would be parked by 7:00 p.m. because of the opening ceremonies at 6:00 p.m. So, at 6:55 p.m., I checked out the parking at the Hanson Garage. There were approximately 175 vehicles in the garage, about 100 more than normal according to the attendant. One gentleman said he had been parked in the garage since 2:00 p.m., and was told that if he waited until just after 10:30 p.m. to leave, it would only cost him $3.00 for all that time, as the attendant would have left at 10:30 p.m. More parking revenue losses.

I then checked the Chown Garage at 7:00 p.m. and found that there were only about 80 vehicles parked in the garage, which is normal at that time. Therefore, virtually no one chose to park at the Chown Garage and walk to the LVEC, as I have said all along.

I parked at the corner of Place D'Armes and Wellington Street at 9:45 p.m. to witness the movement of people leaving the LVEC and proceeding northerly and westerly. People who were headed for the Anglin Parking Lot crossed Place D'Armes in the general vicinity of King Street and the Food Basics parking lot entrance, just as I indicated they would do in my report to the city and to IBI consultants. Any people who came up to the Wellington Street traffic signal were headed for Rideau Street and points northerly and westerly, and many of these people sauntered across the length of Place D'Armes, interfering with westbound traffic that had come from the Causeway.

I observed one motor vehicle accident at the corner of Bagot and Brock Street. Judging from the front-end damage, it looked like at least one of the vehicles was a writeoff.

The City and the event-goers were fortunate that there was enough time to clear snowbanks from streets, and that it was a relatively mild evening.

I was very surprised at the attendance of 2,283 people at the Sunday OHL game, virtually no increase from previous years. I had thought perhaps 3,000 to 3,500 people would be in attendance. Let the speculation begin!

Bruce.

According to the OHL game summary, Sunday afternoon's Frontenacs LVEC attendance, their second match in the LVEC, was just 2,283. That's only 130 more than the average of the previous games played at the Memorial Centre this year.

It probably didn't help that Doug Graham, Whig Standard sports reporter, wrote on Friday that the second match was a sellout (scroll to the very botton).

Update: Some interesting comments on Fronts talk

Friday night had a lot of people that are not hockey fans that were there for the hype and to say they were there. That is a one time crowd.

Also, on the changing dynamic for the Frontenacs' owners:

I am to one point ecstatic that the Fronts have the new arena. NOW THEY CANNOT BLAME facilities for the lack of fans or the players that say they don't want to come here.

In March 2007, nearly a year ago, the LVEC's luxury suites were sold-off. Here's another look at who'll be lording over the regular folks.

It's a who's-who of Rosen-family businesses, tenants of Rosen Family properties, overt Harvey Rosen election backers, companies that do a lot of business with City Hall (including several members of the Kingston Home Builders Association and the Kingston Construction Association), and the usual mainstream media outfits.

All these folks will be hob-nobbing together in suites largely paid-for with tax-deductible expenses, with special parking, a private entrance, private concessions, and priority access to non-box event tickets whose leftovers will then be sold to the general public. More here on the LVEC's perks for the those in this class.

Note that John Wright, owner of K-Rock, apparently controls three suites.

1000 Islands Cruises (Same owners as K-Rock)
1203157 Ontario Limited
J.E. Agnew Food Services Ltd. (Tim Hortons)
Braebury Homes Corporation
Canadian Tire - Cataraqui
CHUM Radio Kingston (FLY-FM)
CIBC Wood Gundy
Cruickshank Construction Limited and Rosen Heating Cooling
Empire Life Insurance Company
Gananoque Chevrolet Cadillac
JKL Micro
Kingston Financial Centre Inc.
Kingston MRI
Kimco Steel Sales Limited (owned in the Rosen family) and Kingston Truck Centre
The Kingston Frontenacs (owned by the Springer family)
The Kingston Whig-Standard
Kingston Young Entrepreneurs
KPMG LLP
K-Rock (Complimentary suite for naming rights holder)
Len Corcoran Excavating Ltd.
Melo Hotels
RBC WAGG
CaraCo Development Corporation and Taggart Investments
The Radio Group (K-Rock & KIX FM)
Thomson Jemmett Vogelzang o/b The Insurance Centre Inc.
Waste Management

Here's the Kingston and District Labour Council Media Release from yesterday.

(KINGSTON) The Kingston & District will hold a media conference on the steps of the new arena prior to its official opening to discuss problems with the arena operator and to support picketing workers. The media conference will include a number of speakers on hand to support local workers, members of International Alliance of Theatre and Stage Employees (IATSE), Local 471 who will not get a chance to bid or work locally on events in the building.

WHAT: Press Conference and speakers.
WHEN: Friday February 22 at 11:00 A.M.
WHERE: Outside the main entrance to the entertainment centre.

While the LVEC project is today in pre-opening confusion and doubt, 14-months ago, back in December 2006, KCAL wrote this:

What's unsaid in recent LVEC discussions is the agreement between the City of Kingston and the Kingston Frontenacs is not silent about a delay in the LVEC's opening.

Translation: As far as obligations to the Frontenacs are concerned, the project can slide. That's covered. In short, the current agreement for the Frontenacs to play at the Memorial Centre is extended. End of story.

Question: why hasn't this option to moderate the pace of the project been presented to the new Council? Under current circumstances, explain why the blind following of artificial imagined "timelines" because of arbitrary and arguably bogus "deadlines" is a good idea. Why wasn't a single project timeline or Gantt chart presented to Council on Monday night?

Recommendation: that staff proceed with extreme caution, and advise council, prior to considering any bookings for the LVEC.

On current trends, it would be par for the course if staff were to let the operator book the LVEC for December 2007 ASAP, thus further tieing the hands of City Council.

The thinking at the time was: don't book the LVEC prematurely because it limits your options, and that can be expensive.

How much would a bulldog have cost since April 2007?

Maybe $150,000?

We could have been reading project progress reports from the bulldog, not the pap we've been reading from Lanie Hurdle ever since.

Today a lot of money is being squandered, corners are being cut, work is being rushed, all because our City Hall civil servants know little about managing quality projects.

Who could have prevented this?

Our current gutless Council balked at the opportunity for independent project oversight. Council had the chance to appoint a Council advocate to the project cabinet but Mark Gerretsen, BIA board member, withdrew his long-delayed motion in April 2007.

So we have a City staff who clearly can't manage projects -- KPMG told us that twice (1-2) -- and a Council that's clearly not into overseeing incompetent Staff. These projects have multi-million-dollar stakes. Mark Gerretsen, thank you very much.

How much would a bulldog have cost since April 2007? $150,000 maybe? We could have been reading project progress reports from the bulldog, not the pap we've been reading from Lanie Hurdle since then.

Bruce Todd has penned a scathing letter to Council and Senior Staff, copies to The Whig, about apparently deceptive communications from The City of Kingston Growth and Sustainability Group and published in The Whig.

Read the whole thing.

Therein:

The special section produced by the Kingston Whig Standard last Friday, February 15, 2008, entitled "It's Show Time" included on page 10 an article on "Ample Parking Available for Event Goers". It paints a picture of parking availability as if no cars are ever on-street or in parking lots on a Friday evening. It gives a detailed number of parking spaces as if these are all waiting to be used by LVEC event-goers. What a deception! What an utter falsehood for those who might not be familiar with Kingston's downtown on a Friday evening in particular.

The article states that "more than 550 on-street parking spaces are located within 600m of the Centre and will be free for use during evening and Sunday events".

To state that all these parking spaces are "free for use" is an extremely deceptive statement.

I have repeatedly surveyed the parking situation in the downtown on a Friday evening around 6:30 to 7:00 p.m., as Consultants should have done for their reports to the City, and, consistently, the on-street parking has been fully utilized except for 30 to 50 spots, and parking lots have been half full or more at that time. I have reported this on many occasions to the city and to LVEC management, but all reports have been consistently ignored.

From Sunday's Telegram in St. John's: the more acts they book at the Mile One Centre, the more money they tend to lose.

Looking at some of the LVEC's upcoming events, it's hard to imagine this isn't already happening here.

Looking back to last February, in 2007. This is old news.

Last year on February 1st 2007 CKWS-TV reported that Kingston's major construction projects were not much benefiting local labour.

On February 12th 2007, the BIA cemented its 30-year, $3-million, back-end loaded, 4.57% credit from taxpayers for the LVEC. Today there is evidently no solid plan, no formal channel of public accountability, to ensure this will ever be repaid.

• A prediction: over the next 29-years the proximate offices, daily lunches, systematic committee face-time, and LVEC-luxury-suite hob-nobbing virtually guarantees that little of that BIA money will ever really materialize. If it does, there's no watchdog at the back-door ensuring that downtown beautification and the "Downtown Action Plan" doesn't fractionally accrue to taxpayers instead, reimbursing the BIA for its LVEC payments.

On February 14th 2007 City Staff dropped 14 major LVEC documents on Council just hours prior to key Council votes on the project. Therein was a " Risk Management Plan" that pegged the risk of "insufficient project funding from fundraising and grants" at a "4" on a scale to "1" to "9". Remember, all of Harvey Rosen's other projects (Market Square and The Grand Theatre) were, and remain, in concurrent public fundraising crisis and everybody, like now, knew it then too.

On February 16th, KCAL published the details behind the LVEC's funding, where the money was really coming from, including an Excel spreadsheet you can still download.

• About that: most Kingstonians still seem unaware that the LVEC has funneled-away $7M that should have been for recreational infrastructure for all of amalgamated Kingston. That's
  • $3M from "development charges" that were previously earmarked for recreational infrastructure by prior councils, plus

  • $4M from the Ontario Ministry of Health promotion, an embarassing grant that still isn't acknowledged on the ministry website. Kingston has not fetched much else from the Ministry of Health Promotion, and that's a crying shame. It's fair to say that several years of Kingston's provincial "Health Promotion" allocation basically went into the LVEC.

    See for yourself:

    

On February 20th, The Whig Standard published several LVEC-related stories riddled with grievous errors about the sums involved in the LVEC project.

This was also the time when it was clear that the second covered-up KPMG Report festered on Council.

Then on February 26th Councillor Vicki Schmolka was mugged on K-Rock's airwaves and K-Rock's Shadoe Davis was being obnoxious in The Whig. You can listen to MP3-format recordings here (Schmolka, Wong, and Davis), and here ("G" and rock-star Rob Baker).

Meanwhile project proponents like Ken Wong and Jeff Garrah get to repeatedly field softballs from CKWS-TV's Julie Brown on KEDCO-funded TV-COGECO programmes.

On February 27th 2007, KCAL's list of apparent LVEC cost omissions.

By the end of February 2007, everybody on Council knew that ALL of the LVEC's financial risks were going to be assumed by taxpayers. Everybody on Council knew the LVEC was a rigged-deal from a taxpayer's perspective.

So what changed? Nothing.

In the end this gutless Council even balked at the opportunity for independent project oversight. Council had the chance, and certainly had the votes, to appoint a Council advocate to the project cabinet but Mark Gerretsen, BIA board member, withdrew the long-delayed motion in April 2007.

Thus Mayor Harvey Rosen and his acolytes were free to continue the unfettered bullying of the LVEC project clear through to the end.

When you hire an out-of-town company to run the LVEC, what do you get? How about an out-of-province non-union labour provider for staging services.

The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 471 (Ottawa/Kingston) is pissed about this, and rightly so.

Update: As it turns out, the facility operator, Arcturus SMG, is bringing-in non-union labour from out-of-town for both staging and for event security for the LVEC's opening concert by The Tragically Hip.

Back in May 2006, rock-star Rob Baker was front-and-centre in a $50,000 ad campaign that featured logos from KEDCO, The Chamber of Commerce, Kingston Accomodation Partners, and local construction associations.

The ad, which ran in all the local papers and on a now-defunct website named WatchKingstonGrow.com, promised "New Employment Opportunities: 750 Construction and 450 post-construction jobs".

At the time, the ad was designed to influence Council for critical LVEC-related votes in May 2006. The website went dark after just one year on April 11 2007. Evidently the LVECs drum-beaters didn't have the $10 and the stones required to keep "Watch Kingston Grow" in the public eye.

So let's recap what's actually happened so far, shall we?

The LVEC was railroaded through on false premises such as this with the help of several supine out-of-town consultants and using out-of-town project management support. It was designed by out-of-town architects, then built by an out-of-town general contractor, using significant amounts of out-of-town construction labour. The arena is being operated by an out-of-town management company that's bringing-in out-of-town non-union labour provider for event-related services. Of course, the vast majority of the acts coming to into the LVEC will be from out-of-town, and most of the box-office will be leaving with them on the bus.

Where's the mayor? He's out-of-town, on holidays, between February 12th to the 20th, while the LVEC fundraising campaign he chairs is $1M short. Harvey Rosen: Vision, Courage, Results.

Friday The Whig Standard distributed a special advertising section to "Celebrate the Opening" of the LVEC. Therein, on page 10 of the supplemental section, is this claim:

London's John Labatt Centre has it, so does Toronto's Air Canada Centre, so does New York's Madison Square Gardens. Like these successful downtown venues, the Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre takes advantage of a dispersed parking model.

Whoever wrote this in The Whig Standard is ignorant.

For the record, so there is no Whig-Standard-induced confusion here:

• The parking story around the John Labatt Centre is nothing like Kingston's North Block. This has been known, on the record, since April 2005. See all the "P" symbols around the JLC in the City of London map at the very bottom of this item.
• Toronto's Air Canada Centre is adjacent to the busiest train station in Canada and, of course, the Toronto Subway. From the arena lobby vast areas of downtown Toronto are accessible in heated underground passageways (link to PATH, a diagram of downtown Toronto's underground walkway that links 27 kilometres of shopping, services and entertainment in weatherproof comfort, including the Air Canada Centre).
• Madison Square Garden in Manhattan is directly upstairs above Penn Station, which serves 600,000 people per day, and is the busiest passenger transportation facility in the United States and by far the busiest train station in North America. No fewer than 14 different subway lines go under or within a block of Madison Square Garden and it's all accessible via heated underground passageways.

But nevermind hyperbole courtesy of our Whig. Let's examine "dispersed parking", shall we?

If you execute a Google search for the term "dispersed parking" you'll get results similar to those pictured at left.

Look who ranks in the top-two spots.

Scroll the list, and look for something else, anything, comparable and related to parking for the LVEC. You won't find it.

This isn't new; it's been this way for nearly a year (a link to our item from April 11 2007).

But it goes back further still: back in mid-September 2006, 17-months ago, Council and our local mainstream media were informed that THE CONCEPT "DISPERSED" PARKING IS NOT EVEN RECOGNIZED IN MAINSTREAM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING.

In other words, "dispersed parking" is homespun crap. Those who have perpetrated this blatant fabrication, and who have built this arena with such contempt for the arena's customers and the taxpayers of Kingston won't be forgotten.

Another false statement by The Whig on Page 10 of the supplement is the number of parking spots available for people on-street and at various lots. They say:

Also, more than 550 on-street parking spaces are located within 600m of the Centre and will be free for use during evening and Sunday events.

KCAL's Friday night counts around 6:30-7:00 p.m., on the public record beginning May 25 2005, have consistently show only about 30-40 empty parking spots on-street. The Kingston Whig Standard has slept through this whole boondoggle.

But here's where things get really weird for Harvey Rosen, the Springers, City CAO Laubenstein and senior City Staff.

If you search google for the exact phrase "dispersed parking model" (with quotes) just one document is returned. A well-formed query which returns a single Google result, which is extremely rare.

It's a story from the Berkley Daily Planet, written in 2006, and it's about a grocery store with serious parking issues.

Now how bizarre is that?

Parking lots surrounding the John Labatt Centre in London.

See also

• Celebrate THIS! #3: Joe deMora's "silent majority"
• Celebrate THIS! #2: The CastleGlenn traffic and parking study
• Celebrate THIS! #1: LVEC PM Don Gedge's firing kept secret for over 2-months, until after the 2006 municipal election

Consider this:

• Last Tuesday evening Council awarded the LVEC's naming rights to CIKR-FM, a local radio station commonly known as KROCK.
• KROCK is owed by John Wright, and the station's website lists John Wright as its General Manager.
• Just prior to Tuesday's deliberations, Mayor Rosen suddenly recused himself, declaring a conflict of interest because of ownership of 863 Princess St, which is also where KROCK and John Wright lease offices.
• Archive.org confirms that John Wright and KROCK have been tenants at 863 Princess since March 30 2003 at least, and quite possibly earlier.
• Between late March 2004 and September 2005 the LVEC was supposed to be built on waterfront, on Kingston's Inner Harbor, Kingston Marina: land owned by John Wright.

One question arising is: If Mayor Rosen, via his holdings, has had a long-standing and ongoing business relationship with John Wright, under the same roof, then how come Mayor Rosen didn't disclose this apparent pecuniary interest when deliberating the Anglin-Bay LVEC which was supposed to be built on land owned by John Wright?

Here's a link to the proposed LVEC naming rights agreement which the city has put online.

The name of the company hasn't been revealed. Reading the agreement, it's evidently a media company.

The deal has an interesting twist: the Sponsor explicitly becomes the preferred supplier for spending on promoting events.

So it appears that the Sponsor:

• pays $150k/year for name branding (as expected);
• provides a $150k/yr discount on the promotion services (the sweetener);
• but the Sponsor gets the cream of the event promotion pie.

The event promotion pie could be worth $600,000 per year. At that level of media purchasing, you might expect a 25% discount ($150,000) in any case. If so, staff might be drastically over-selling this deal to Council.

How ironic would it be for K-ROCK to be on the outside looking-in at the LVEC's promotional expenditures for the next 10-years?

Then again, if the Sponsor is a local consortium, which presumably would include KROCK, that would re-connect some interesting dots.

Either way it looks to be a coup for the Sponsor, and it shows the poor negotiating position of the City.

See, the deal is not just for the naming rights. It's also for 10-years of event advertising and promotion business. That business is guaranteed, in the short-term, because heavily promoting the LVEC is imperative.

The business also flows 2-ways, as the Sponsor can curry the favour of its advertisers inside the building.

There's more: if aggregate attendance is below a yet-to-be-specified threshhold the Sponsor can just walk away. No Hershey Centre scenarios for these folks! If ticket sales are "poor" the shortfalls will be borne by Kingston's taxpayers as the agreement provides specific bail-out clauses for the Sponsor.

More to the point, if there's over-allocation to event advertising and promotion, leading to more funneled through the Sponsor and corresponding lower than expected operational profits, the regrettable shortfalls will be picked-up by taxpayers.

Notice the continuing theme: Once again, Council is being asked to quickly approve a complex long-term LVEC-related deal with information provided at the very last possible moment. That's how staff at senior levels in this city continue to operate.

There's an interesting article in Sunday's Soo News about how their LVEC's naming rights deal has gone sour. The brewery (Steelback) sponsoring the arena is in bankruptcy protection and their last cheque for $67,500 was NSF.

See this article in the December 17th Globe and Mail Report on Business for more details on the $120 million owed to more than 400 creditors.

A citizen's petition is in circulation demanding that the arena's name be changed to include "Sault Memorial Gardens".

Expect Kingston-City Staff to present the Soo's naming-rights deal to Kingston City Council without any mention of the Soo's current predicament! Troubles in Sault Ste. Marie have been well known since November 2007, but protecting the interests of Kingston Taxpayers, and honesty in accounting never counted for much here.

The Whig Standard has been running this advertisement for a special advertising section to "Celebrate the Opening" of the LVEC to be published on February 15th.

Until then, KCAL will be featuring many items you probably won't be reading in whatever The Kingston Whig-Standard prints about its pet-project.

#3. Joe deMora's "silent majority"

Flashback:

• December 16, 2003: At Council, Mayor Rosen announces the formation of a "Large Venue Entertainment Centre" (LVEC) Task Force, and KGH CEO Joe deMora is on it. The normal process for selecting individuals to serve on Council committees is to invite applications through public advertising, with individuals selected on the basis of a council vote. However, in this instance, there is no attempt at any public process accountable to elected city representatives. Instead, the Task Force consisted of members hand-picked by the mayor.

• March 21, 2004: The Mayor's Task Force releases its Report to the Mayor, which calls for, among other things, an LVEC to be built on Anglin Bay waterfront, in the current location of Kingston Marina.

• May 18th, 2004: The Whig reports the Mayor's Task-Force is in full-sell mode on TV, and quotes Joe deMora as saying:

  "It's time for the silent majority to be a little less silent," he said.

• On April 29 2005, Joe deMora is a member of the the KEDCO Board of Directors when KEDCO publishes a document titled "Economic Benefits of the LVEC", which is released just 4-days prior to a critial LVEC-related Council vote on May 3 2005.

• August 2005: Joe deMora lists himself as a Friend of the Entertainment Centre. Indeed.

• September 22, 2005: KCAL petition bearing over 3,700 names drops on Council. Instead of re-assessing all that is fundamentally wrong with the project, a backroom deal with swing-councillors just prior to the Council meeting moves the project off waterfront, to the North Block.

  See also Joe deMora in Who's Who in the Proposed North Block LVEC Project.

• November 2006: None of the LVEC's swing-councillors is re-elected.

• End of January 2008: Nine months into the LVEC's public fundraising campaign, with less than a month to go, Joe deMora is not on the public list of donors to the LVEC, and the campaign is still $1M short of its target.

See also

• Celebrate THIS! #2: The CastleGlenn traffic and parking study
• Celebrate THIS! #1: LVEC PM Don Gedge's firing kept secret for over 2-months, until after the 2006 municipal election

You are looking at the combined published calendars for January, February, and March 2008 for LVECs in Mississauga, Oshawa, Guelph, and Sault Ste-Marie.

Four comparable buildings to Kingston's LVEC, over a full three months. We've circled the non-OHL hockey events to get a sense of what else these buildings draw.

You are looking at just 17 non-hockey events in a possible 364 event-days. This includes:

• At the Hershey Centre in Mississauga, there are no publicly calendared "events" other than OHL hockey. The facility operator there is Arcturus SMG.
• In Oshawa, one concert in January, 3-days of Skate Canada synchro-skating, 3-days for the Durham region Golf Show, and one Old Timers' game in February, and one concert in March.
• Nothing is currently scheduled at the 5,100-seat Sleeman Centre in Guelph other than Guelph Storm hockey games.
• In Sault Ste. Marie, it's OHL hockey plus two concerts in January, two concerts and two-days of OHL All-Star Celebrations and "Boo Soo 2008 opening festivities" in February, and one day for Monster-Truck Madness in March.

See also:

• Combined LVEC calendars of Mississauga, Oshawa, Guelph, and Sault Ste-Marie for Q4 2007 (23 events in 368 event-days).
• Combined LVEC calendars of Mississauga, Oshawa, Guelph, and Sault Ste-Marie for Q3 2007 (14 events in 368 event-days.

In the three quarters we've been tracking this, other than OHL home-team events, we've seen just 52 non-OHL events into 1,100 potential event days.

These OHL arenas don't appear to be anything like economic players for their local communities.

Recently in the Whig: on January 25th an LVEC-related editorial titled Mayor must step it up, and today (January 29th), an article on Market Square's fundraising failure titled The well has run dry, group finds.

If we've learned anything, it's "fundraising" should never be taken at face-value.

There's more: apparently Mayor Rosen is due to fly South for a holiday shortly, just as the LVEC fundraising campaign is supposed to be winding-up.

Another question: Do "Buy Local" invocations from Kingston merchants apply to holidays, or just to other people's spending?

On January 22 2008 The Whig ran a story titled Economic forecast bleak: report.

The author, Alan Arcand of the Conference Board of Canada, forecasts a 2.1% growth rate for 2008, as compared to 2.5% in 2007. ( Note: The 2007 numbers are not finalized, and are likely subject to adjustments for months thereafter.)

The article gets interesting in its closing paragraphs.

First, there's this about Ken Wong.

Ken Wong, a professor at the Queen's School of Business, said he wasn't surprised by the results of the forecast. Indeed, some of the same predictions were made during an economic forecast luncheon held late last year by the business school.

Thanks to the previous council, which managed to get several large construction projects started, Kingston has the potential to experience much higher growth, Wong said.

"We at least have a foundation we can build on in terms of creating some economic prosperity for the city," he said. "It's not like we don't have anything we can promote."

For example, when it opens, the west-end multiplex will bring people here for hockey games. Likewise, the Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre will bring some big acts to town. "If you get great acts, you get people. If you get people, you get prosperity," Wong said.

Translation: prosperity from a dysfunctional, mostly empty, money-losing OHL arena, and prosperity from ice-pads.

Then, there's this about Jeff Garrah.

Jeff Garrah, CEO of the city's economic development organization KEDCO, said his agency plans to work closely with local agencies, such as the Downtown Kingston Business Improvement Area, the Greater Kingston Chamber of Commerce, and Kingston Accommodation Partners to help make Kingston an even more desirable place to live.

We're hearing reports now that the advanced-sales ticket selling process for the Avril Lavigne concert at the LVEC will only let people buy one ticket at a time, even for general admission tickets.

This means that to buy (say) four tickets you need to make four transactions, with four separate sets of fees, including four sets of odious ticket shipping charges.

The Whig Standard has been running this advertisement for a special advertising section to "Celebrate the Opening" of the LVEC to be published on February 15th.

Until then, KCAL will be featuring many items you probably won't be reading in whatever The Kingston Whig-Standard prints about its pet-project.

#2. The CastleGlenn traffic and parking study

Flashback:

• September 30th, 2004, the City of Kingston hires Don Gedge as LVEC Project Manager.

• On October 19th 2004, CastleGlenn Consultants are hand-picked without tender by project manager Don Gedge for their " keen understanding of the Wellington Street Corridor " to conduct the Traffic and Parking Study for the proposed LVEC on Anglin Bay.

• April 20th, 2005. CastleGlenn tables a draft of its report. The City chooses to release online only its related PowerPoint presentation, which they first convert to an Adobe PDF file. The DRAFT - Phase I: Traffic and Parking Viability Assessment Study is 2.4 Mb in size but contains just 22 kb of actual text information.

• April 21st, 2005, a story breaks in Ottawa about serious parking problems with the Ottawa Lynx baseball stadium. CastleGlenn Consultants is a consultant on that project, which involves fair weather-only events with dispersed parking with shorter outdoor walking distances than are proposed for Kingston's LVEC for winter attractions.

• April 23rd, 2005, Bruce Todd, with more than 40 years experience in traffic engineering and planning, highlights some of his measurements from the LVEC along Wellington to nearby parking lots. They clearly show erroneous distance measurements within the CastleGlenn report.

• April 24th, 2005, KCAL publishes what it believes are some other Serious Problems with the LVEC Parking and Traffic Study.

• April 25th, 2005, Bruce Todd releases a more in-depth and damning analysis of the CastleGlenn report.

• April 25th 2005, the city hosts a televised Have Your Say public meeting at City Hall.

• The next morning, less than 10-hours later, with full knowledge of the problems with the CastleGlenn Traffic and Parking study, the project is approved by Councillor Ed Smith and the LVEC Steering Committee.

  KCAL later reveals evidence to support the belief that the public meeting was evidently stacked by Kingston's BIA. Councillor Ed Smith is both a BIA board member and the chairman of the LVEC Steering Committee. He was the stager, and moderator, of a crucial public meeting and we believe that he is partly responsible for the pretense of genuine public consultation.

• April 30th, 2005, KCAL publishes more corrections to the CastleGlenn traffic and parking report.

• May 21st, 2005, members of KCAL, not the City, scan and post CastleGlenn's full Phase I Traffic and Parking Study online for citizens to download.

• In late May 2005, the serious problems with the CastleGlenn report are still not acknowledged by the City, project manager Don Gedge, Councillors, the mainstream media, or anyone working for CastleGlenn Consultants. This prompts KCAL's Bruce Todd to write a series of 14 daily letters to The Mayor and Councillors.

  No satisfactory response to Mr. Todd's letters is ever received. The first six letters were replied to by Mr. Gedge and said, in effect, "trust us". No replies were ever received to the last eight letters.

Mr Todd has, we remind you, over 40 years experience in the field of traffic engineering and planning.

• None of Kingston's print or television outlets has reported on any of the problems with CastleGlenn's April 20, 2005 Traffic and Parking report, as noted by Mr. Todd.

• Armed with this report on Traffic and Parking that we believe is fudged to justify the Anglin Bay location, Council was asked to approve the North Block location for the LVEC at the November 1st 2005 Council meeting.

Those tuning-in early to tonight's Council meeting on COGECO-TV Channel 13 were treated to Julie Brown, of CKWS-TV News, shamelessly serving-up leading powder-puff questions to LVEC project manager Lanie Hurdle and Arcturus SMG's Neil Shorthouse about our wonderful, wonderful new Sports and Entertainment Centre.

The program was "KEDCO on the Street" and lists KEDCO CEO Jeff Garrah as one of its producers.

Make no doubt: it's a blatant infomercial. Our local TV news-anchor is all-in, parroting the LVEC party-line to Kingstonians.

The Whig Standard has been running this advertisement for a "special advertising section" to "Celebrate the Opening" of the LVEC to be published on February 15th.

Until then, KCAL will be featuring many items you probably won't be reading in whatever The Kingston Whig-Standard prints about its pet-project.

#1. The firing of Project Manager Don Gedge was kept secret for over 2-months, until after the November 2006 municipal election

The LVEC's first project manager, and first-engineer on the LVEC railroad, was a man named Don Gedge.

Don Gedge was fired in October 2nd 2006, but this information was kept from the public, and from Council, until AFTER the November 2006 election where the LVEC boondoggle was, by far, the most contentious campaign issue. Mayor Harvey Rosen was narrowly re-elected.

There's more: The Kingston Supine-Standard, finally reporting the firing of Don Gedge in a story published on December 14 2006, two days after reporter Bill Hutchins broke the story in The Heritage, completely downplayed the 2-month delay in disclosure.

How's that for slimeball local politics?

The Whig's publisher at the time, Fred Laflamme, was a "founding member" of a group calling itself "Friends of the Entertainment Centre", about which we'll have lots more to say. This group thought putting the LVEC on Kingston's waterfront, clobbering a marina, part of a park, and displacing a fireboat-builder that employs 60 skilled-workers, was a fine idea.

There are a number of LVEC-related items on Council's agenda for Tuesday, January 22.

• By-law amendments to support KRSEC Transportation Operations Plan.
• Quarterly Report of the Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre.
• Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre Project Status Report - December 2007 which is mis-collated and split into two separate parts of the 62-page PDF.

  Therein:

  • No takers to run the LVEC's food services and the Sports Cafe. Arcturus/SMG therefore recommends that they manage both amenities at opening based on an event only operation.
  • About the fundraising "Campaign":

    Fundraising Campaign

    As of January 3rd, the campaign had raised $787,611 or 39.4% of the City's $2 million goal. This brings the total private sector contribution, including the $6 million from the Downtown Kingston BIA and the Kingston Accommodation Partners, for the project to $6,787,611 or 84.8% of the $8 million goal outlined financing portion of the business plan

    How's that for candy-coated bull?

    The agreement with the BIA is a 30-year unsecured sweetheart agreement that, in the end, won't see the BIA pay any more than they would be paying anyway. The agreement with KAP is also unsecured, and is contingent on the continued existence of KAP, a loose organization that could be dissolved this afternoon on almost any pretext.

    There's more:

    The campaign office set up a table at the Chamber of Commerce Holiday Mixer on December 13th at the Four Points by Sheraton Hotel. The campaign received exposure to 120 local business people, raised $205, and provided information to several potential donors.

    Considering that the Chamber of Commerce was key in selling the big-lies of "community support", "silent majority", and "Losing our chance at hosting the Memorial Cup", and considering also that Chamber of Commerce members are, on balance, no-shows in the LVEC's anemic fundraising campaign, that's just disgraceful.

In Monday's Whig Standard, in the editorial page Opinion Column, Williamsville Councillor Ed Smith pats himself on the back.

Therein,

I regret that there were some members of our community whose attacks on some council members became personal during the heated debates on some of these major projects. Such an experience does not encourage good people to enter or remain in public life. But to councillors' credit, they remained steadfast in their support for projects they believed to be in the best interests of Kingston and the people who live here, now and in the future.

Debates? What debates? Ed Smith, the LVEC's somnolent "Streering Committee" chairman, organized and chaired an apparently stacked "public consultation" meeting then, less than 10-hours later, Ed Smith forwarded apparently pre-determined recommendations to council, complete with attaboys from proponents and no mention, not a word, of the significant and widely evident opposition to the LVEC project, a mistake that cost at least $504,100, plus time wasted.

Evidently the not-so-subtle distinction between "encouraging good people to enter or remain in public life" and "coralling process-fudging lunatics and their half-baked plans" escapes Mr Smith.

Consider:

• Ed Smith's council voting record,
• For many years, Ed Smith sat in the centre of Kingston's grotesque Downtown Kingston subsidy entitlements, and
• no current councillor sits with fewer votes than Ed Smith, this by a wide margin. Mr Smith can thank vote-splitting in his district for not being frog-marched off Council during the last election.

The LVEC's ridiculously over-hyped so-called "benefits" will soon to be apparent to all and, for Mr Smith, there will be no escaping responsibility for it. Until then, high-fiving himself in The Whig is really all Mr Smith can do.

According to Pollstar, Avril Lavigne will play in the LVEC on Tuesday April 8th 2008.

This is the first and only concert booked so far that delivers on the LVEC promise that Kingston's youth won't have to travel out of town to see popular acts.

On Council's Agenda for Tuesday is a report from Staff that recommends the IBI Group to create recommendations for further development of the North Block.

It is hoped that the timing for the award of this work will position the City to be able to decide on the next steps in the redevelopment of the police building at 11 Queen Street in addition to meeting a number of other objectives related to the sustainable redevelopment of properties in the area.

It appears that waiting to see the extent of the disaster the LVEC turns out to be before frittering away any more money on the North Block was never an option.

It's pretty clear that unflattering independent assessments of prior LVEC-related reports by the IBI Group have fallen on deaf ears at City Hall.

If all this goes ahead, this could lead to a very interesting juxtaposition: when the LVEC's logistical dysfunctionalities are a reality, the firm that apparently white-washed its logistics will be presenting reports, and collecting handsome fees, for next-steps related to the LVEC's immediate surroundings.

On December 4th, The St. John's Telegram published an article titled Mile One in the red -- May never break even, mayor says about the precarious financial situation of the 6,250-seat Mile One Centre, and what some politicians are saying about the Centre now.

Mile One Centre is in the red for $640,000 and may always have some level of subsidy from the City of St. John's.

When questioned on whether the stadium and convention centre will ever break even with it's $1.5-million subsidy from the city, Mayor Andy Wells snapped back that the facility may always be in some debt.

"We're not going to break even on our Mundy Pond facility, we're not going to break even on Wedgewood Park, we're not going to break even on Mile One.

According to the LVEC business plan, our building is supposed to easily cover its costs and service its debts.

Coun. Ron Ellsworth tabled Mile One Centre's financial statements and 2008 budget Monday night, pointing out operating losses of $639,596 for 2007 and a projected $527,560 loss for 2008.

That means city residents are paying about $2.25 million in subsidies to keep the centre operational. Wells said that number is reasonable when compared with the benefits the city receives from the facility.

"As far as I'm concerned it's been a good deal. It's been controversial... but I'm perfectly satisfied that things are falling into line," he said.

We expect to hear the same sorts of things from Harvey Rosen and Ed Smith about the LVEC.

Here's a link to the Mile One Centre Events Calendar. Just like the four other Ontario arenas we're watching, there's really nothing going on at the Mile One Centre, with just one non-hockey event (Blue Rodeo) scheduled in the first three months of 2008.

So far this year, the QMJHL St. John's Fog Devils have attracted an average of 3,365 fans to their 18 home-games, which is about 52% of the building's capacity.

Given all this, how is it possible that some politicians in St. John's can claim to be satisfied? Who's kidding whom?

The construction cost of the Mile One Centre was $35 Million in 2001. The present value of St-John's $2.25 million in annual subsidies over 30-years, given the latest prime rate of 7.25 %, is $27 Million.

Related:

• City subsidy for Mile One climbs to $2 million from CBC News on December 12, 2007.
• St. John's Downtown Development Commission News, March 4 2005:

  Just 3 years ago:

  "In a deal the City of St. John's says will not require a taxpayer subsidy, the Fog Devils will play next fall in Mile One stadium after all."

  March 4, 2005

  In a deal the City of St. John's says will not require a taxpayer subsidy, the Fog Devils will play next fall in Mile One stadium after all.

  ...

  The new deal will see the two sides share profits equally, with the Fog Devils responsible for any losses.

  Coun. Keith Coombs, who chairs St. John's Sports and Entertainment, says Mile One's operating deficit will not worsen under the deal.

  Mile One has been running a deficit since it opened in 2001.

  "The city has met its objective of ensuring there's no subsidy," Coombs said.

There are two LVEC-related items on Tuesday's Council agenda.

• The "2008 Operational Budget for the Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre", a real joke of a "budget report", is buried in this PDF document. Let the record show that, even at this stage, the LVEC is supposed to cover its debt load in its first 10-months of operation.
• The LVEC Project Status Report, mis-collated, is buried in this PDF document. The fundraising efforts are, evidently, no cause for expressed concerns.

In a full-page colour ad in today's Whig is an announcement for 5 LVEC events:

• Belleville Bulls vs Frontenacs on Feb 22, 2008.
• Tragically Hip on Feb 23, 2008.
• Tracy Lawrence & Craig Morgan on March 16, 2008. Ticket Prices: $79.50 and $59.50.
• Stars on Ice on April 20, 2008. Ticket prices $102.00, $72.00, and $52.00.
• Charley Pride on June 14, 2008. Ticket Prices: $64.50 and $54.50

There's no mention of the other dates everyone already knows about:

• Blue Rodeo on February 27, 2008.
• Oldtimers hockey on March 27, 2008.
• Harlem Globetrotters on April 1, 2008
• Anne Murray on April 22, 2008.

About all this, some observations:

• Evidently there are plenty of country singers, washed-up or otherwise, who can be booked to play in the LVEC.
• Trivia: who's older, Anne Murray or Charley Pride? Charley Pride's photo in the ad appears to taken at least 25-years ago.
• Evidently the LVEC's promoters are being tight-lipped about all the great acts that Kingstonians once needed to travel to Toronto and Montreal to see. Presumably these acts, appealing to "young people" to help compel them to "remain in Kingston" thus making the LVEC "a huge driver of our future", will be announced shortly.

On December 11 2007 The Whig published this story titled Fans get dibs on Hip; Concert tickets sold on website first.

Tickets for the Hip concert, the first entertainment event planned for the Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre, will go on sale tomorrow, with true Hip fans getting first dibs.

Registered users of the band's website, www.thehip.com, will get first pick of tickets to the show. These fans can log onto the Hip website starting at 10 a.m. tomorrow to find a link to purchase advance tickets. They will be available until midnight Thursday.

So the taxpayers of Kingston are forced to hold-the-bag for the LVEC boondoggle, but for the LVEC's opening concert event, registered fans of the band, regardless of where they may be, get first-dibs on tickets? It's pretty clear who's calling the shots here.

Nevermind that rock-star Rob Baker is in for peanuts despite being the face of LVEC, the rest of the band is, so far, not yet on the list of arena donors.

There's more: the LVEC fundraising campaign is still $1.3M short of target yet the Tragically Hip is using the opening concert as a fundraiser for some pet-charities, not the arena.

Not that Camp trillium and Lake Ontario Waterkeeper aren't worthy causes. It's just that, in the scheme of things, the taxpayers of Kingston never counted for anything. The LVEC's opening concert is just another sign of that.

It's also a clear sign that, despite all that is invested by taxpayers, when it comes to the LVEC the City of Kingston is powerless.

The Oldtimer's Hockey Challenge, who in the past played each year in Kingston's Memorial Centre, will play in the LVEC on Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 7:00 PM.

Here's the George Jones tour schedule. He's playing in lots of smaller towns. Kingston's not on the list. "Passing us by on the 401" between Toronto (April 8) and Ottawa (April 9).

Just like Avril Lavigne who still "passes us by on the 401" between Ottawa (April 3rd) and Toronto (April 9).

George Jones:

MAR 25 TCU PLACE SASKATOON, SASK 7:30
MAR 27 CRYSTAL CENTRE GRANDE PRAIRIE, ALB 7:30
MAR 28 THICKWOOD ARENA FT. MCMURRARY, ALB 7:30
MAR 29 NORTHERN JUBILEE EDMONTON, ALB 7:30
MAR 31 SOUTHERN JUBILEE CALGARY, ALB 7:30
APR 01 CONEXUS ARTS CENTRE REGINA, SASK 7:30
APR 03 BURTON CUMMINGS THEATER WINNIPEG, MAN 7:30
APR 04 BURTON CUMMINGS THEATER WINNIPEG, MAN 7:30
APR 05 COMMUNITY AUDITORIUM THUNDER BAY, ONT 7:30
APR 07 CENTRE IN THE SQUARE KITCHENER, ONT 7:30
APR 08 ROY MASSEY HALL TORONTO, ONT 7:30
APR 09 CIVIC CENTRE OTTAWA, ONT 7:30
APR 12 METRO CENTRE HALIFAX, NS 7:30
APR 13 CENTRE 200 SYDNEY, NS 7:30
APR 16 COLISEUM COMPLEX MONCTON, NB 7:30
APR 17 AITKEN CENTRE FREDERICTON, NB 7:30
APR 19 PEPSI CENTRE CORNER BROOK, NF 7:30
APR 20 COMMUNITY CENTRE GANDER, NF 7:30
APR 21 MILE ONE CENTRE ST. JOHN'S, NF 7:30
APR 23 CIVIC CENTRE CHARLOTTETOWN, PE

The Stars On Ice 2008 Tickets and Schedule page shows us that Kingston's LVEC is evidently too small.

The smallest venue on the Stars on Ice schedule is the Save-On-Foods Memorial Centre in Victoria which seats 7,400.

The Stars on Ice tour features Kurt Browning, Jamie Sale and David Pelletier, Sasha Cohen, Jeff Buttle, and Marie-France Dubreuil and Patrice Lauzon.

They'll be "passing us by on the 401" sometime between shows in Ottawa (April 19) and Toronto (April 25). Even with a five-day scheduling cushion, the LVEC evidently isn't attractive.

Stars on Ice tickets in the smaller venues like Victoria are typically $50 (ends), $70 (sides), and $100 (at ice level). In Toronto the ice-level tickets are $130.

Here's the link to the LVEC website: http://www.kingstonrsec.ca.

That's an odd web address considering that the much shorter and intuitive http://krsec.ca is registered to Paul MacLatchy in the name of the Corporation of the City of Kingston. Is this a sign of acrimony between Arcturus and the City?

Launching the website before the naming-rights deal is a clear signal that revenue from LVEC naming-rights may not materialize.

Some "features":

• Here's the Premium Seating (club seats) brochure. This gives us the first view of the "Club Lounge" which, of course, won't be open to regular folks.

  Club Lounge/Bar accessible to guests with Club Seat tickets or Suite tickets only.

  Note how the "Club Lounge" is absurdly distorted in relative size in the diagram.

  

• A "blog" which is just a web page with the word "blog" sprinkled on it, as if that's what a blog is. Clearly these folks just don't "get" it. Where's the RSS feed, for example?
• This won't surprise anybody: looking at the "Partners" page, the group called "Kingston Accommodation Partners" is a thinly-veiled alias for "KEDCO", as this link to the KAP "partner" demonstrates.
• The LVEC uses an american company, tickets.com, as its ticket broker. Just another example of our money leaving town, in this case it's the handling fees on ticket sales.
• There's a Ticket Packages page which looks designed to flog the Downtown. So much for the LVEC benefitting all of Kingston.

  These packages will include Stay, See & Play entertainment and recreation experiences with tickets to Kingston RSEC events, local attractions and great accommodations.

• The Kingston Frontenacs are listed as a "partner" even though Kingston taxpayers may know them more as pigs at the LVEC trough.
• The home page, and all the site's interior pages, just like every other website associated with the City, miserably fails basic validation. There's just no demonstrable professionalism in web design or implementation here.

  Another example of sloppiness: check out the venue seating layouts which look more like curling rinks than hockey rinks. The PDF brochures exhibit the same obvious problem.

  It would appear that rookies are in charge of the LVEC's web presence.

  
  Curling, anyone?

Finally, the Kingston Regional Sports & Entertainment Centre Transportation Operations Plan is online.

The KRSEC Transportation Operation Plan is on the agenda for the Environment, Infrastructure and Transportation Policies committee agenda for Thursday.

The agenda document refers to "Exhibit A - KRSEC transportation Operations Plan Draft Final Report, December 2007" which is distributed seperately and not yet available on the City of Kingston website.

We assume that Staff will be improvising this document until the last possible moment. Here we are, just two months before opening, and traffic and parking is still being improvised with "Draft Final Reports". This is possibly the first time we've seen a major plan masquerading as an exhibit.

Get this: Parking is to be split into three zones. Parking in zone-1 will cost $8.00 in city-run lots, $5.00 for lot parking in zone-2, and $3.00 in zone-3. On-street parking is still free everywhere, regardless of zone.

What we'll likely see is jammed streets, stalled traffic, mostly empty city lots, and nearly zero ancillary busineess downtown during event nights, with taxpayers picking up all the pieces.

Denis Leger and Glen Laubenstein signed-off on the plan which, on Saturday December 8th, still wasn't publicly available.

The meeting is Thursday, December 13, 2007 at 5 p.m. in Conference Room AB Rideaucrest Home.

Edward Grenda, president of the Kingston Historical Society, wrote this letter that the The Whig published on December 4th 2007. The LVEC is being constructed adjacent, some might say atop, a 17th Century settlement site.

Evidently the remaining bastion is not being respected by project and site managers and contractors.

Simply put, this type of treatment of a national historic site is outrageous and speaks of rank negligence on the part of those responsible for the supervisory functions on this project. The damage to this site was a patent violation of various provincial and federal regulations governing designated historic sites.

Read the whole letter.

There's a draw at OurCanada.ca where you can enter to win one of 85 VIP concert passes to Anne Murray concerts. One of the dates you can select is Kingston, on April 22nd 2008.

This will be an LVEC concert, not the Grand Theatre, as she plays London's John Labatt Centre two nights later. Ticket prices in London are $82.75, $62.75, and $48.75.

Here are the Anne Murray tour dates: Moncton - April 15; Charlottetown - April 17; Halifax - April 18; Montreal - April 20; Ottawa - April 21; Kingston - April 22; London - April 24; Toronto - April 25; Sault. St. Marie - April 26; Thunder Bay - April 28; Winnipeg - April 29; Regina - April 30; Edmonton - May 2; Calgary - May 3; Kelowna - May 6; Victoria - May 8; Vancouver - May 9.

Anne Murray is 62 years-old.

Update: : It's official.

In response to Barbara Wamboldt's November 27th Whig opinion piece titled Naming the sports centre: let's call it The Millstone, the Whig published this letter by Sally Barnes on Saturday December 1st.

Therein:

In a nutshell, Wamboldt says events at the new centre will be unaffordable, it will benefit only downtown residents and Kingstonians won't be willing to brave the winter weather to attend events there.

Oh, c'mon, Barbara. We are Canadians. It will take more than bitter winds off the St. Lawrence river to scare off our adults and kids anxious for the opportunity at last to attend exciting concerts, sporting events and ice shows now available only to those who can afford family trips to Toronto and Ottawa.

Folks in London and other medium-sized cities competently plan, finance, manage and benefit from their downtown sports and entertainment centres. Why not us? Let's show some faith in our civic leaders and ourselves.

In addition to this blatant wishful thinking and revisionist history (see also here), it's notable that Sally Barnes was communications co-chair of the 2006 Harvey Rosen re-election campaign.

The pretense of non-partisan insight in Ms Barnes' letter is notable.

Many may not agree with her views, but at least Ms Barnes has contributed towards what she believes, which is more than can be said for most of this long list of so-called "Friends of the Entertainment Centre".

A pointed observation might be: Ms Wambolt was merely saying what is increasingly obvious to everyone. Ms Barnes is well-advised to remember that we'll soon know exactly how the LVEC performs, financially or otherwise.

When that time comes, we'll surely recall who was glibly shooting-the-messenger here.

There's concern in Sault-Ste Marie about the ongoing naming rights to the Sault's $25M Steelback Centre as Steelback faces a 'liquidity crisis'.

That $135,000 per anum 10-year naming rights deal started just 13 months ago.

There's an interesting opinion column by Barbara Wambolt in today's Whig Standard.

Welcome to Kingston's new large-venue entertainment centre, The Millstone.

Sounds good, eh? It's time we called a spade a spade and accepted what we've all known and feared all along: that the downtown sports and entertainment centre is becoming a burdensome responsibility. Will its costs eventually be heaped on the backs of lowly taxpayers who probably won't be able to afford to attend events there, even if they were willing to freeze their arses off in winter while they walked the the facility from God knows where they finally found a place to park?

There is a telling small photo in a recent Kingston Frontenacs press release. Here it is the photo, blown-up somewhat in size.

The press release vaunts the Kingston Frontenacs LVEC seat selection for current season-ticket holders.

Each one of those dark spots is a seat taken by an existing season ticket holder. We know from the numbers on this diagram that each LVEC seating section contains between 270 and 370 seats.

Therefore we're looking at a thousand or fewer season-tickets carried forward to the LVEC from the existing Kingston Frontenacs season-ticket holders.

Consider that the cost of this seat-selection was zero -- these seats are for the last seven regular-season games and, given current trends, probably zero playoff games, for which current season-ticket holders have already paid. The selection of seats gives rights to these specific seats for 2008-2009 and beyond, but the incremental cost of these rights was zero at the time of seat-selection.

The KCAL grapevine at the Memorial Centre is very clear on this: a significant number of current season-ticket holders say they will not be renewing for 2008-2009 and beyond.

All told, this is quite a ridiculous underachievement by the Kingston Frontenacs. What's worse: taxpayers of Kingston are holding the bag on a 30-year deal with this chronically underachieving outfit.

The Blue Rodeo website indicates that the band will be playing at Kingston's "Entertainment Centre" on Wednesday February 27th.

Golly! The two-car tsunami of Kingstonians who would travel out-of-town to see Blue Rodeo now won't have to.

The schedule shows Blue Rodeo playing in in Cornwall on Friday, February 8th, and in Kitchener's 50+ year-old Memorial-Cup-2008-hosting auditorium on Thursday, February 9th. They are also playing in Belleville (date TBA).

Tickets on this hockey-bowl tour are typically in the $40-$50 range, and most of those receipts will be leaving town on the tour bus.

Judging from the venues where Blue Rodeo is playing, the Memorial Centre is where they would happily be playing if the LVEC wasn't there. This won't stop Kingston's self-congratulating LVEC-philes from back-slapping each other in toasting the great achievement that is attracting Blue Rodeo to Kingston to play in the arena's opening week.

Another act with a Kingston date so-far is the Harlem Globetrotters on Tuesday April 1, 2008 at 7pm. Presumably the Globetrotters travel with their own floor because the LVEC hasn't got a basketball floor and, even if it did, there would be no place to store it. Tickets for the Globetrotters in Ottawa on April 2nd are $17 to $96, and in London (April 5th) are $25 to $91. The Globetrotters routinely played at the Memorial Centre in the past, so this isn't an act the LVEC is attracting to town and, again, nearly the full gate leaves town on the bus with the team.

Don't hold your breath

Teen pop star Avril Lavinge, originally from Napanee, plays in Buffalo NY on March 29th, The Bell Centre in Montreal on April 2nd, Scotia Bank Place in Ottawa Apr 3rd, the Air Canada Centre in Toronto on April 7th, and the John Labatt Centre in London on on April 9th. Kingston's just not in this league, but if there is an LVEC stop, it'll be between April 4th and 6th.

The Foo Fighters, who play in Montreal on March 17th, Ottawa on March 19th, London on March 20th, and Toronto on March 25th, certainly won't be stopping here.

Monster Jam Trucks, in London on March 8th, won't be coming here. Some local wankers promised that Monster Trucks would come, but the awful logistics at the LVEC means that just isn't going to happen. If it ever does, it will be the only time.

On Tuesday The Whig ran this article about how the fundraising shortfall would mean "no new taxes", but the public purse -- in the form of reserves -- remains fungible to cover the LVEC's underachievements.

The article also mentions the possible raiding of a new Federal program for projects of "significant economic or regional impact", as if there wasn't already a long list of far better-suited and deserving needs in and around Kingston.

Evidently City Staff isn't much concerned with those. Amalgamated Kingston be damned, it's apparently still all about subsidizing downtown land owners and others who, in the scheme of things, are the least deserving of taxpayer subsidies.

So far the LVEC has scammed $4 Million from the province under the guise of "health promotion", $3M in development charges previously earmarked for increasing Kingston's woefully inadequate recreational square footage and now, apparently, seeking still more under the pretense of "economic development".

Hands-up if you think this had better stop, and soon.

The Whig Standard apparently needs a report from City Hall before publishing anything related to the scandalously underachieving LVEC fundraising campaign.

Ditto for CKWS-TV News.

Here's what's transpired in the past week:

• On November 8th,The Whig Standard and all the other local media outlets report that Mark Segsworth, the city's 20-year public works commissioner, has quit. "To spend more time with his children", according to The Whig.
• On November 9th we learned that, despite constant chirping about city staff being overworked, Mr Segsworth apparently will not be replaced. Here's the City's org chart.

  All those yellow-green bubbles now report to either Lance Thurston (green, Community Development Services), Denis Leger (brown, Corporate Services), or Jim Keech (purple, Utilities Kingston).

• On November 15th, The Whig reports that Mr Segsworth has been appointed public works manager for the Township of South Frontenac where, coincidentally, Mr Segsworth happens to live.

Here's what's really interesting about all this: None of our local media have chosen to tie Mr Segsworth to the LVEC boondoggle in any way, even obliquely. On the other hand, all media tied Mr Segsworth to the Market Square disgrace, which saw its perpetual renaming to "Springer Market Square", bought by the Springer family for less than one-sixth the cost of one single renovation.

Apparently Mark Segsworth is getting a free-pass out of town, despite being the overseer of both the City's Transportation and Engineering departments during the entire LVEC fiasco.

In The Whig today: The Partners in Mission Food Bank is in tough.

One reason: competition for donations, which includes competition from LVEC fundraising.

Hands up, those who didn't see this coming.

The agenda for the Tuesday November 6th Council Meeting is now online and there's nothing LVEC-related on it.

Recall that, at the last Council meeting, Councillor Schmolka asked the Mayor for an update on LVEC fundrasing. The Mayor replied that he, in his capacity as fundraising campaign chair, would have a report for Council this week.

Right.

Meanwhile, everybody knows that $2M LVEC fundraising drive is, so far, an embarrassing disaster for the Mayor.

Bruce Todd has written seven letters to City Councillors and senior City staff about the traffic issues around the LVEC. This arises from the October 30, 2007 public meeting which, by all accounts, was a total embarassment. The meeting featured presentation by firm of Totten Sims Hubicki (TSH) about the Place D'Armes / Ontario Street intersection.

In letter #1 titled Peer Review, he wonders how a motion of Council calling for a completely independent peer review about traffic in the area of the LVEC turned into a report from a non-independent consultant (Totten Sims Hubicki) about just one intersection.

In letter #2 titled Availability of information prior to a Public Meeting, he points out the complete lack of information made available prior to the October 30th 2007 public meeting, and the lack of information available at the public meeting itself.

In letter #3 titled Telling the Public Why the Intersection has to be Reconstructed and Signalized, he bemoans that the public was never told WHY the intersection needs to be completely re-designed and rebuilt, what the costs were, what ancilliary impacts would be, and almost no information about options.

In letter #4 titled A conflict of Philosophies, Mr Todd points out the incoherence between policy and what the city proposes to do here.

Letter #5 titled Baffled by Words raises questions about how evaluation criteria were established, and why one percent of the intersections users are apparently driving the decisions about its design.

In letter #6 titled Road Reconstruction/Rehabilitation, he asks why traffic "moves" that weren't hitherto required are now proposed, and why expenditures on roadbuilding is occuring years before development has been agreed upon. He also points out that the citizens have been sold a bill-of-goods with a concept called "dispersed parking", which is a term undefined and unaccepted in the traffic engineering world. If you search for "dispersed parking" in Google, we see that the City of Kingston continues to own the top spot, having invented this notion, practically out of the blue, in the justification of the LVEC's location.

In letter #7 titled Impacts of Various Traffic Scenarios, it's clear that the consultants are making traffic recommendations while ignoring effects on both upstream and downstream traffic flows.

In closing, Bruce Todd states:

I am asking councillors to get us back on track and demand a peer review of the IBI Transportation Study in every aspect.

About that, see Bruce Todd's final evaluation and summary of the IBI Transportation Study, which have been known for over a year, in which Mr Todd concludes:

In summary, IBI has unprofessionally wriggled its way around addressing any problems with this project. IBI is proposing a parking scenario that is clearly in uncharted waters. And the city and the taxpayers are left to resolve their own problems.

It appears that The City of Kingston has now procurred for itself three embarassing traffic reports. What's worse is we're not being shown anything from the third one, by the firm of Totten Sims Hubicki.

The fallout from last night's so-called "public meeting" on the Ontario Street/Place D'Armes intersection, adjacent to the LVEC, begins with this from the WestSport blog: The Best Question of the Evening.

"After hearing comments and concerns from people at this meeting, and after the report of TSH, is anything going to change? Are you going to do what you planned to do anyway?"

Read the whole thing.

Also, here's The Whig's article: Consultants grilled on arena traffic plan.

In a move apparently designed to minimize publicity, and minimize public input, the City has scheduled a public meeting on very short notice at 7 p.m., Tuesday, Oct. 30, in Memorial Hall, City Hall.

This meeting has been delayed before, presumably because the LVEC has created some tricky and embarassing traffic problems downtown generally, and around this intersection in particular.

This is interesting: this "Public Notice" was not placed on City of Kingston Press Releases page, where public meeting announcements are routinely found.

Also this "Public Notice" does not appear in the City of Kingston's RSS feed , where such notices are routinely transmitted to subscribers.

The kicker: there are no drawings, and no documents posted online, about the proposed design of this crucial intersection. There is no way for the public to gauge what's proposed other than to attend the meeting in person, and sit through it.

Does this seem like a genuine overture to the public about this vital piece of Kingston's infrastructure? What does this smell like to you?

In the October 22 2007 issue of Canadian Employment Law Today: City executive gets fired after his salary report yields unpopular results. Apparently former City of Kingston HR director Bill Bishop claims that City CEO [sic] Glen Laubenstein didn't react well to a report that didn't fit his world view.

This is old news. Curious that article refers to "CEO".

From the Limestoned blog: Got Coach?

The organization fired Cassidy while on a northern road trip where they were beaten Sunday night by the league leading Sault 'Hounds before heading to Sudbury tonight to play the bottom feeding Wolves. Not that the Fronts are much higher on the food chain, but the interm coach stands a better chance to win his first game behind the bench against the last place team rather than the first place team.

Read the whole thing.

As it turns out, Kingston lost 4-0 in Sudbury.

Update : Here's related a post blog named "Out Of Left Field": FRONTS: MAVETY, SPRINGER THROW A NECKTIE PARTY FOR CASSIDY.

The Frontenacs have some nice players, but they are 12 games in and haven't won a game in regulation time. They are dead last in all of Canadian major junior hockey in goals scored and in goals allowed.

Read the whole thing; there's more, it's hilarious.

From the Westsport blog: Contravention of the Noise by-Law in Kingston.

Noisy construction on the LVEC at early hours on Sunday mornings has been happening for quite some time. EllisDon don't have a bylaw exemption from Council for this, and City staff have done squat following numerous complaints about it.

Add this to the growing list of things for which Glen Laubenstein, Cynthia Beach, Lanie Hurdle, and many others deserve to be held accountable.

A brief LVEC-related item in today's Kingston Whig Standard illustrates what we've been up against since April 2004 when the LVEC saga began.

Fundraising for the sports and entertainment centre is just over a third of the way to its $2-million goal.

The $46.5-million project requires the money as part of its business plan.

According to the city's website, as of Oct. 15 the fundraising total stood at $630,072.43.

Evidently Whig Editors don't work on LVEC-related items. $630,072.43 is not "just over a third" of $2-million.

When it comes to the LVEC, The Whig has always been about overstating the positives, minimizing or omitting the negatives, to the point of apparent misrepresentation.

There are several illegible or indistinguishable elements in the latest published schedule.

On Tuesday evening Council will receive the September 2007 LVEC Project Status Report from City Staff.

As usual, the report is in black and white, and buried with other documents in a PDF file with no table of contents. Note that this package is improperly collated: The report starts on page 39, but the report's introductory pages begin on page 89, with two unrelated documents in between.

A table of contents for these.PDF reports would not only be very useful for readers, it would also prevent collation sloppiness like this, which is a chronic problem: see here, here, and here.

The report includes 16 pages of detailed project schedule dated September 27th, 2007. At least Staff's submissions of six-week old project schedules seems to have improved somewhat; this one is only three weeks out of date.

Why does staff persist in submitting reports with formatting wholly unsuitable for black and white presentation? Maybe they really don't want people reading too closely? See also here.

In several places the report states:

Some activities are on schedule. Some construction activities behind schedule could have an impact on the critical path.

The unreadability of several critical elements of the published schedule sheds no light whatsoever on that.

Apparently on September 30th 2007, the project had received $619,672 in donations and pledges. Yet today, on October 14th 2007, two weeks later, the City's Latest Campaign Donors List shows only $618,937.50 in donations and pledges. Has the fundraising campaign gone $735 backwards over the past two weeks?

Let the record show that, four months before the LVEC's scheduled February 22 2008 opening, this City Staff report, like others before it, convey the distinct impression that everything is hunky dory with LVEC project finances. There is no expression of concern about the $2M fundraising campaign which looks to be falling absurdly short at this juncture.

Four comparable buildings to Kingston's LVEC, over a full three months. We've circled the non-OHL hockey events to get a sense of what else these buildings draw.

You are looking at just 23 planned non-hockey events into a possible 368 event-days. This includes:

• In Mississauga: BMO Skate Canada accounts for five of the eight items on its published schedule. Kingston's LVEC has virtually no chance of hosting something like BMO Skate Canada becase we don't have a warm-up rink, and there's not enough ancillary space.
• In Oshawa: 3 days are scheduled for the Heart of Country Craft Show, and one for Stuart McLean "Live from The Vinyl Cafe" among the eight items in its schedule.
• Nothing whatsoever is currently scheduled at the 5,100-seat Sleeman Centre in Guelph other than Guelph Storm hockey games. This has been independently confirmed.
• In Sault Ste. Marie: Two days are booked for the Korah Collegiate Reunion, and one day for a Rememberance Day ceremony among the seven events on its published 3-month schedule.

Not exactly the stuff of 2,500 to 5,000-ticket juicy box office receipts like we've been told to expect here in Kingston.

The LVEC Business Plan assumes 97 events per year, 41 of which (including a wildly improbable 4 home-playoff games per year) are assumed to be Kingston Frontenac events.

Of the 56 remaining expected events, 11 are assumed to come from other hockey-related events and tournaments, and the 45 remaining events are assumed to be "Concerts", "Family Shows", and "Other Events" drawing, on average, between 2,500 and 5,000 people each.

In other words: roughly 12-15 big-revenue-generating non-hockey events per non-summer quarter.

Not bloody likely. That is roughly equivalent to the current performance of Mississauga's Hershey Centre and Oshawa's General Motors Centre COMBINED in a year that Mississauga hosts BMO Skate Canada (5 days) and Oshawa's schedule is padded with a Craft Fair (3 days) and other events that, clearly, we would host in The Grand Theatre.

See also: Combined LVEC calendars of Mississauga, Oshawa, Guelph, and Sault Ste-Marie for Q3 2007.

There are two recent LVEC-related posts over on the WestSport blog:

• Why Not This Way? asks why the LVEC is being shoehorned onto a single, small, and oddly-shaped city block. As a result the building is obviously too small and constrained.
• Kingston's LVEC: there is no "good" solution about the problems facing the designers of the intersection of Ontario Street and Place d'Armes, just outside the LVEC, and the recently postponed public meeting about it.

  The city should be ashamed. There are, in fact, city employees who are ashamed and who are embarassed by what the previous council has inflicted upon the city. It is they who are charged with finding "good" solutions to something for which there ARE no "good" solutions.

  The city awaits the solution to an impossible situation.

Related to this: nobody can say they weren't warned.

Last week the Whig Standard ran this ad for the LVEC fundraising campaign, part of a series in which Kingstonians who have donated briefly state why, and encourage others to do likewise.

According to Ken Wong,

It (the LVEC) enhances our ability to do so many things -- culturally, economically and socially. It can be a huge driver of our future.

Right.

Ken Wong has been a notable drum-beater for the LVEC. Here is a retrospective of Ken Wong's published views on the matter, with links to others' comments related to those views. Judge for yourself.

Ken Wong prior to the LVEC (prior to 2004)

Background: Prior to 2004 there was, among other things, a proposal by a firm named Kingston 2000 Developments Ltd to build a $200M arena and hotel on Block D.

• December 11 1999. Whig Standard Letter by Ken Wong about the proposed Kingston 2000 Developments Ltd project on Block D.

  As a marketing professor and consultant whose clients include companies like Starbucks, Microsoft and 3M, I spend my professional life dedicated to understanding people in the act of buying. With that background, I found myself cringing at some of the incredible assumptions being made at council about people's shopping behaviour, in order to support the Kingston 2000 project as drafted.

  First, you cannot force customers to do the unnatural. The concept that off-site parking will force consumers into acts of shopping is one such unnatural act. (I would be happy to provide examples of failed attempts to do this). Yes, you can bring a horse to water, but you cannot force the horse to drink. The reality is that people will park as close as possible to their final destination - whether that suits commercial interests or not.

  One need only do what city CAO Bert Meunier suggests in order to see what that means for Kingston. Draw a circle around Block D the size of - let's be generous - the parking lot of the Corel Centre or Cataraqui Town Centre. The argument is that if people will go to malls and walk that far, then the same should apply here. Because of the location of Block D relative to downtown stores and on the waterfront, less than a third of that circle is occupied by stores. In short, most of the much-anticipated traffic will never see a store, let alone visit one.

  Change "Block D" to "Anglin Bay" or "North Block" and what do you get? Read the whole thing.

• February 2 2000. Whig Standard Letter by Ken Wong on "developments in the face of substantial and non-partisan public complaint".

  There is something wrong when developers violate laws and escape with a slap on the wrist. There is something wrong when council violates established legal procedures to work with developers. There is something wrong when private citizens are asked to pay fees for projects they didn't ask for but that benefit developers. And there is something wrong when council pays lip service to the citizens they represent and pursues developments in the face of substantial and non-partisan public complaint. Development opponents would be more than justified if they said: "I told you so."

  Read the whole thing.

Ken Wong in the LVEC-on-Anglin-Bay era (March 2004 - September 20 2005)

Background: The original LVEC plan showed it as occupying the Kingston Marina site on Kingston's Inner Harbour. This would have meant the relocation, at considerable expense, of MetalCraft Marine and its 70 employees, a locally-owned and internationally-respected builder of Fire, Rescue, Patrol and Work boats. Ken Wong was a member of the Task Force responsible for this idea.

• March 21, 2004: The Mayors Large Venue Entertainment Centre Task Force Report.

  The report contains 13 recommendations, six of which are never seriously implemented, or are dropped altogether after their pretense helps sway the building's political approval.

• May 18 2004: Task force goes on TV to make point. Therein:

  Members of the panel have long maintained that there's a large group of people who don't speak out at public meetings who support the concept and who have personally told them of their support.

  De Mora said those people have to start being more vocal if the project is to work.

  "It's time for the silent majority to be a little less silent," he said.

  Today we know that the "silent majority" was a fabrication, and was indicative of the insularity of the Downtown Kingston echo chamber that hatched the LVEC plan in the first place.

• May 27 2004: Arena task force tries to build support.

  Construction association told to speak out in favour of new arena.

• July 13 2004: Ken Wong letter: More Economics 101: LVEC benefits outweigh costs. Professor Wong obviously didn't understand the Memorial Centre sale issue.

• August 8 2004: Letter by Howard Stone: Lift fog surrounding LVEC.

  Defending the impossible is an impossible task, and defending the Large Venue Entertainment Centre proposal is equally impossible. Yet the fog surrounding this issue continues to roll ashore - witness Ken Wong's letter "More Economics 101: LVEC benefits outweigh costs" (July 13).

  The main problem with the LVEC proposal is that the experts did a quick and dirty study that started out with one objective - to replace the Memorial Centre. But on the way through the project morphed into an LVEC. A downtown business organization locked on and the rest is history.

• August 23 2004: Social costs of Anglin Bay LVEC would be too high by Jana Mills, defending the Memorial Centre from the LVEC plan.

• September 2004: Elite Consensus? Follow the Money..... by Jamie Swift in the Pic Press.

• March 3 2005: Ken Wong letter: Kingston needs a new arena, and the best location is downtown. Which prompted these retorts, among several others:

  • March 4 2005: Letter from Dennis Brown on the smoke and mirrors in Ken Wong's arguments.
  • March 17, 2005: Task force member's parking figures incorrect where Bruce Todd rebuffs Ken Wong on his parking cost estimates of March 3 2005.

• March 4 2005: Comment "the hand is quicker than the eye" illusion because buildings built on the Memorial Centre land would probably have been built elsewhere.

• April 16 2005: Can a new arena really help a city's downtown? It's not a given!

• August 26, 2005: Ken Wong is a founding member of the "Friends of the Entertainment Centre" (a link to KCAL's copy of their membership page. The Friends of the Entertainment Centre website is now defunct).

• August 26, 2005: Spot the differences where the "Friends of the Entertainment Centre" group, which lists Ken Wong as a founding member, are caught red-handed misrepresenting the size of the Anglin Bay LVEC on all their website's pages.

Ken Wong in the LVEC-on-the-North-Block era (September 20 2005 - Present)

Background: When swing-councillor support for the LVEC's Anglin Bay location collapsed on September 20th 2005, LVEC promoters immediately concocted a back-room deal to move the project to the North Block, as if the waterfront location was the project's only notable dodgy aspect.

• September 23 2005: In a Whig story about the North Block possibility, Task Force member Ken Wong hints that building the LVEC there would require sacrificing local businesses such as Food Basics.
• December 10 2005: Arena: Who gets final say?: Hold a referendum, councillor urges.

  Ken Wong,...., said he does not support a referendum because it limits participation to those old enough to vote.

  Also:

  "How much more public debate do we need?".

• December 13 2005: Whig Editorial: Arena process must be open

  Ken Wong, who was on the mayor's original task force looking into construction of a large venue entertainment centre, condemned Downes for taking "desperate steps." Also, Wong points to this change of location as proof that a referendum isn't necessary -- that councillors are listening to the people.

  That was disingenuous! Here's how it went down: a 4,000 name petition was dropped on Council at the last moment on September 20th 2005.

  Prior to that, there was NO discernable "listening" at all. The arena was a "done deal" and there was never any variation to the original plan of forcing Kingston Marina out of business to put the LVEC on the waterfront. Also the boulevarding of Wellington street leading to Anglin Bay had already begun, in an area that is well outside anything detailed in the 2003 Downtown Action Plan and prior to any firm plans for the Wellington Street extension.

• November 4 2006, Whig Standard Letter by Ken Wong: Don't be swayed by arena naysayers' tired arguments.

  Kevin George's call for a reassessment of the arena business plan is similarly naive. Why would he expect a finding different from what past studies have found? Two task forces said the facility was viable. A KPMG consultant said it was viable. The city's planning department said it was viable. Every credentialled expert who has studied the plan in detail has concluded it is viable. Indeed, with so many different independent sources of expertise concluding that the plan is viable, one has to wonder who Mr. George would appoint in search of the answer he wants. Is this just a veiled attempt to take the non-committal middle ground instead of being decisive? This is no small matter; it's a $2-million-plus question. And that is a very conservative estimate

  It is imprudent and irresponsible for Downes and George to assume that the Downtown Kingston Business Improvement area, Kingston Accommodation Partners and provincial government contributions will still be available if the arena is moved (to my knowledge, this has not been explored); to forget the $1-million-plus public cost of building 2,500 parking spaces that will only be used 100 nights a year; and to forget that delays will mean the chance to bid for the next Ontario-hosted Memorial Cup hockey tournament will be lost.

  I am weary of these mayoralty candidates' rhetoric about an undemocratic process and favouritism toward a select few with business interests. The task force invited and listened to several local groups and individuals before we wrote our proposal. Minutes were posted to the city's website, and The Whig had a reporter at all our meetings. We held public forums after we released the report, and a second committee of review was struck. (Incidentally, Mr. Downes, who was appointed to that review committee, chose to write his final opinion in a letter to the editor prior to the final public hearing; yes, that's democracy).

• December 14 2006: Whig Standard: Economic guru preaches patience.

  Wong said economic and political leaders need to stay focused on major upcoming public projects such as the new entertainment centre, which he said would attract increasing volumes of out-of-town investment to the city in the next year.

• February 26, 2007: Calling shenanigans on KROCK's Shadoe Davis and For the record: KROCK 105FM's pro-LVEC push. Audio clips of Ken Wong on KROCK with Shadoe Davis, who's not part of the Kingston scene anymore.

Two things are also evident:

1. So far the marketing of the LVEC project has been an abject failure. Marketing is supposed to be Ken Wong's area of expertise.
2. The lack of strong support from the Kingston business community towards the $2M LVEC fundraising campaign is extremely dissapointing.

What if Mr Wong's wishful predictions don't come to pass? What if annual taxpayer subsidies in the six- or seven-figure dollar range are required to keep the LVEC afloat, like has happened in London and Guelph and elsewhere? Consider also that the LVEC does not solve the Memorial Centre problem, which along with its annual taxpayer-financed six-figure dollar costs, remains with us.

So far most of the great things that were promised by arena promoters, like local benefits from construction jobs and "silent majority" support (also here and elsewhere), have not come to pass.

Released Friday, Oct 5th:

A public meeting about the signalization of the Ontario St./Place d'Armes intersection originally set for this Tuesday, Oct. 9 (to start at 7:30 p.m. at Memorial Hall at City Hall) has been postponed until further notice.

...

"Given the sensitivity of this area, we are being exceptionally conservative and cautious moving forward," says Malcolm Morris, Director of Transportation.

Possible translation: The LVEC's traffic and accessibility story is REALLY a mess.

Nobody can say they weren't warned.

When do you think was the time to be "conservative and cautious moving forward"?

Early last week the Whig Standard ran this ad for the LVEC fundraising campaign.

Writing teacher Julia Kempffer is looking forward to a world-class venue for large international classical and instrumental performances.

If we look at the full list of events hosted by the 10,000-seat John Labatt Centre in London since 2003, and the thin event histories of other OHL venues much closer in size to Kingston's LVEC, this donor is likely to be very disappointed.

Evidently hockey bowls aren't places where "large international classical and instrumental performances" are typically hosted.

There's more:

And she is delighted that it will also be accessible to patrons with special mobility needs.

Many people, it seems, are unaware of the the LVEC's accessibility disgrace.

What do you think of the rectitude of LVEC project management and The Whig who print and perpetuate these apparent misconceptions?

According to an article in Today's Whig, Councillor Ed Smith apparently said this at last Tuesday's Council meeting:

Councillor Ed Smith said he didn't see anything that should prevent Homestead from receiving the exemption. He added that the company has made several donations to local projects and is a supporter of the city. Approving the exemption would send a message to the company and to other developers, Smith said.

"One of the things we have a reputation for in this city is not being very business-friendly," he said.

Ed Smith must believe we're all stupid.

Insurance Company Donates $50,000 To The Fundraising Campaign.

Great! Now we just need just 27 more like Empire Life and LVEC fundraising will reach its meagre $2M target.

Some would say that compared to $150,000 per year that naming rights are expected to fetch, Empire Life, a candidate for that level of LVEC support, disappoints greatly here.

Empire Life is one of the luxury suite holders.

Three LVEC-related articles appeared in yesterday's Whig.

1. A tangled federal funding trail -- Letters capture mayor's attempts to obtain money for arena from Ottawa, by Jordan Press, outlines Mayor Rosen's ongoing failure to sell the LVEC to the Federal Government for funds. Note how the LVEC is apparently being touted as a "recreation" asset, which requires the suspension of disbelief considering Kingston's real recreation infrastructure deficit, nevermind our general infrastructure backlog.

   Question: If most Kingstonians believe the LVEC is a boondoggle, why wouldn't the Federal Government be aware also?

   See what other communities are doing infrastructure-wise with their Federal funds from the same program. It would be a shame if Kingston didn't get more funding for real infrastructure because the Mayor and staff were apparently busy trying to save face on the LVEC's finances at the expense of other worthy projects that might benefit all Kingstonians.

2. It's all business at seminar about the October 10th Chamber of Commerce LVEC business seminar.

3. Tempers flare at debate about how the LVEC came up among local provincial candidates in a public debate.

   Liberal candidate John Gerretsen and New Democrat candidate Rick Downes clashed several times over a series of accusations Downes has levelled at Gerretsen throughout the campaign.

   Downes, as he's done several times during the last few weeks, blamed Gerretsen for allowing Kingston city councillors to spend money earmarked for roads and bridges, like the third crossing, on the downtown arena.

   An angry Gerretsen interrupted Downes, who had the floor, saying, "Not true, not true, not true. Get your facts straight." He was reprimanded by the moderator.

   Downes retorted, "I can understand why the sitting member is so sensitive about the issue."

   Indeed.

Remember this, from June 17th? Frontenacs "Season Tickets Sales UP 41% from this time last year" !

Here's how that's actually playing-out so far:

These numbers are tickets distributed or sold. KCAL members attending these Frontenacs games report that the actual turnstile count appears to be much, much lower than the 6,017 being reported for the first three games of 2007-2008.

So, how much do you trust the people who own and run the Kingston Frontenacs?

At the urging of our stellar municipal staff, the City of Kingston signed a 30-year LVEC deal with this chronically underachieving outfit.

Related:

• April 9, 2007: Kingston Frontenacs' summary and detailed attendance have been updated
• Kingston Frontenacs Attendance Summary 1997-2007
• March 27, 2007: A glance at 2006-2007 attendance in Oshawa's new GM Centre
• December 11, 2006: A glance at OHL attendance in Oshawa's new General Mortors Centre
• May 20, 2006: Whig: If you build it, they won't leave
• May 17, 2005: Baseball Lynx: Lack of parking contributing to club's shrinking attendance

Sources:

• http://kcal.ca/Reveal_Fronts_RawData.html
• http://www.ontariohockeyleague.com/stats/schedule.php?view=season&team_id=2&season_id=32

The following notice has been circulating by email only. There is not yet any notice of this on the City of Kingston website

From: Leonore Foster
To: LFoster@cityofkingston.ca
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:01 AM
Subject: Public Meeting Ontario Street/Place D'Armes intersection

Dear Resident:

Public Meeting on the Ontario Street/Place D'Armes intersection

7.00pm, Tuesday, October 9

Memorial Hall at City Hall

The firm of Totten Sims Hubicki (TSH) were hired to conduct a peer review of the new design of the intersection at Ontario Street and Place D'Armes.. Representatives of TSH will be present at the public meeting to provide a description of their work and findings. A question and answer session will follow their presentation. The Ontario Street/Place D'Armes intersection is slated for full reconstruction in the spring of 2008. In the meantime, a temporary right-turn lane will be constructed to enable eastbound traffic on Place D'Armes to turn southbound to Ontario Street.

Please attend this meeting to hear what the consultants have to say, to ask your questions and to express your point of view.

(As a reminder, Place D'Armes is slated to re-open on September 28 and the underground utility work that is currently underway is expected to be completed by mid-October.)

Please let your neighbours know as I may not have their email address.

Cheers-----Leonore

It's quaint that those on Leonore Foster's email list are the only ones in-the-know about that.

Another example: Where do you suppose you'd find out about upcoming LVEC-related traffic chaos? From the City of Kingston? You would be wrong.

To get the skinny on the traffic hell to come, you'll need to go to the Downtown Kingston BIA website's Entertainment Centre page:

Update on Street Construction - As of September 10, 2007

Here is a list of work being done on the streets surrounding the KRSEC:

• Underground intersection signalization works at Barrack and Ontario - Sept. 10-17 (no significant traffic interruption)
• Watermain construction on King St. from Queen to Barrack - Sept. 10 - 21 (no road closure, but reduced lane widths with flaging)
• Underground intersection signalization works at King and Barrack - Sept. 17-24 (no significant traffic interruption)
• Underground electrical works Place D'Armes from Ontario to King - Sept. 17-28 (Place D'Armes closed in this area)
• Underground signalization and lighting works on Barrack from King to Ontario - Sept. 24 - Oct. 1 (reduced traffic volume)
• Utilities Kingston Cable pulling operations on Barrack and King various locations - Oct. 1 - Nov. 30 (minor traffic disruptions)
• Watermain and gasmain construction on Ontario from Place D'Armes to Queen - Oct. 1. - Nov. 15 (closure to all south bound traffic, detour up Place D'Armes to Wellington to Queen to Ontario, North bound unaffected)
• Road works at the corner of Place D'Armes and Ontario Oct 1-5 or Nov. 5-10
• Sidewalk on west side of King from Barrack to Place D'Armes and Sidewalk & Lay-by lane on Barrack from King to Ontario - Oct. 15 - Nov. 12 (closure of Barrack and continued closure of King)

Spring 2008 - resurfacing of the roads will be completed on:

• Barrack from Ontario to Wellington
• Place D'Armes from Ontario to Wellington
• King St from Queen to Place D'Armes (possible base asphalt this fall)

What do you think of Lanie Hurdle's LVEC Updates now?

Also: how much of the above work do you think is being charged to the LVEC? Answer: nobody knows, because with this project the developer is the regulator and proper, transparent accounting apparently hasn't been happening. Not yet.

Here's Don Curtis' latest admonition in Kingston This Week.

According to Mr Curtis, all we need to make boondoggles vanish is pretend they aren't there. All we need to reap fabulous benefits from the LVEC is be optimistic, and trust that providence will be kind. Presumably the downtown land owners will share the wealth with the taxpayers of amalgamated Kingston, who are financing the whole arena deal, and shouldering all the risks alone.

Once again, Mr Curtis does not disclose to the reader his ongoing relationship with The City, which is through KEDCO. KEDCO, you will recall, was apparently used as a tool to sell the LVEC to the prior Council. Selling an arena to Councillors and taxpayers, as opposed to selling Kingston to outside business investors.

More on Don Curtis here, here, here, and here.

Front page, above the fold, in The Whig today: New quarters cosy for hall of fame; In six years, attraction could run out of room.

What, the LVEC soon won't have enough space for the 'Hall exhibit? What a surprise!

According to the article, the Kingston and District Sports Hall of Fame will, regardless, still require space in the Memorial Centre for storage once the LVEC opens.

There is a place where the Kingston and District Sports Hall of Fame can expand, and that's online. The 'Hall doesn't have a website that we could find and, so far, nobody has even bothered to create a Wikipedia article about it.

Which begs the question: just what, exactly, is the 'Hall doing for Kingston's sports heritage, and for whom?

From the Greater Kingston Chamber of Commerce, this event on Wednesday, October 10, 2007, between 8:30 and 2:00 at the Confederation Place Hotel, you can learn from the "experts" how you can leverage the Kingston Regional Sports & Entertainment Centre and its events for maximum exposure of your business.

Here's the event flyer in PDF format. The program, which carries a $75 registration fee, looks like this:

Event proceeds will go towards the LVEC fundraising campaign.

The feature speaker is Ken Wong, who will endeavour to sell the LVEC to local businessmen who don't appear to be behind the LVEC in a meaningful way. It would appear that most of the "Founding Members" of the long-defunct "Friends of the Entertainment Centre" are shunning the LVEC as shown by their failure to come up with significant contributions for the fundraising campaign.

It is probable that the hefty multi-million dollar annual taxpayer subsidy required to keep the "successful" John Labatt Centre afloat (see also here) will not be mentioned by the guest speaker from London.

The Kingston Frontenacs will tell attendees what they know about marketing. They'll have help from Arcturus SMG, who appear to be having trouble booking events for the Hershey Centre in Mississauga. Let's hope they'll do much better in Kingston.

There is a very interesting LVEC-related item in Report No. 95 of the CAO, which is on Tuesday's Council agenda.

Keep in mind that there isn't a single diagram adorning the item. The diagram below is by KCAL.

Also keep in mind that this is presented as a "done deal"; no alternatives are presented. Nonetheless, council is being asked to approve this.

It starts with an apparently intractable problem:

In reviewing the seating layout, EllisDon identified some structural challenges which would impact the retractable seats. The seats in question, should they be installed, would not fully retract under the current risers. These retractable seats were included in the scope of the facility to accommodate stage set up for concerts. In order to be valuable from an operational point of view, the seats need to be fully retractable. There are currently 118 retractable seats which will only retract on about two rows of seats.

Translation: "Probably due to an embarassing design screw-up, or lack of time to properly re-design this, or lack of space backstage in the LVEC, or some combination of these reasons, sections we thought would be rectractable, won't be!".

This project has been so opaque, with diagrams and drawings so sparse, that we must turn to the Kingston Frontenacs website for a year-old (ancient) seating diagram to make some sense of what City Staff is talking about.

In that diagram, we find some seating sections with markings that may indicate seat retractability. Those sections are outlined in red below.

This might explain why, this late in the game, Council and the public hasn't been officially shown any seating diagrams.

We suspect that this issue has been known for quite some time, but it's been easily hushed-up because this Council is a pushover and the LVEC project has little effective Council oversight.

There's more.

Based on discussions with Arcturus/SMG, it was suggested that in order to make a better immediate use of the facility and its capacity, all retractable seats should be removed and that the space could be used as a premium zone. This zone could increase advertising revenues and provide for some prime viewing positions which could include high top tables and chairs.

Team Canada hockey fans have seen this in TV broadcasts from Europe: large areas close behind the boards where they park Skoda automobiles. One reason is they have lots of empty seats anyway, so they can place a car promotion in an otherwise premium section without losing much ticket revenue. The Kingston Frontenacs, who've sold-out just one game in the past six years, are understandably fine with the idea.

Back to this done-deal: remember the roughing-in of the 1,000 extra seats that Council approved on July 10th? Arcturus and staff is telling us that the retractable seating system that will dissapear should be used as a "credit", and the value of that be used to fill some or all of the empty risers that the 1,000-seat rough-in creates.

The net effect is more seats in the LVEC for opening day, and the apparent burial of an embarassing engineering problem, all without undue delay of the building's progress towards its bogus deadline.

No other options are proposed.

• The monetary value of the retractable seating system "credit" is, apparently, not something Council needs to know.
• Using the "credit" to reduce the cost of the arena, and hence the risk to taxpayers, is evidently not an option.
• Assigning the "credit" to contingency, and filling the 1,000-seat risers later as originally planned is, apparently, not an optoin.

The report doesn't even tell us if the LVEC will ultimately ever be able to hold a full 6,000 seats, as was originally promised. Without the retractable seating system, the answer appears to be "not without adversely affecting the flexibility and functionality of the venue".

Why is ultimate seating capacity not mentioned in the report? This angle should be vigorously explored by Council; somebody probably deserves a haircut for this omission.

Another question might be: what did senior staff know when the 1,000-seat rough-in was proposed to Council?

The Issue #9, September 6, 2007 Update on the LVEC has been posted on the City website. It's a 3-page PDF with no diagrams.

There's no mention of the $527,000 high-definition scoreboard, a story which ran in The Whig on Saturday, September 1st, 2007.

There's no mention that construction activities now include Sundays and holidays.

There's no mention of imminent traffic tie-ups due to construction.

A full quarter of the report deals with odd minutia of interior acoustics.

There's no mention at all of anything related to surrounding work, such as this City of Kingston Tender which is due today (September 12th) for "Construction and Reconstruction of Concrete Sidewalks and Lay-by Lane at King and Barrack Streets", for over 1000m2 of exterior surface work. Not a single damn drawing of that.

The city has applied for $8 million in Federal funding for the LVEC under an existing program named the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund. See what other communities are doing infrastructure-wise with their piece of CSIF. That's not to be confused with COMRIF, the Canada-Ontario Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund, for which the LVEC project was nowhere near appropriate.

Fundraising seems currently stalled at between 25 and 30% of target.

About LVEC fundraising, in practical giving terms the $1.44M shortfall represents 28 more Bill Daltons, or 56 more Walter Fenlons, or at least 288 more rock star Rob Bakers. Oh by the way: going head-to-head with the United Way campaign which just launched.

Arcturus SMG, the firm that will manage Kingston's LVEC, also manages Mississauga's Hershey Centre.

Last week this news: Hershey Centre hosts Skate Canada events, which will take place on December 5-9 2007. Some 500 of Canada's best skaters are expected to try and qualify for the 2008 BMO Canadian Figure Skating Championships (January 16-20, 2008 in Vancouver) and the 2008 BMO Skate Canada Junior Nationals (January 30-February 2, 2008 in Ottawa).

It's good that Mississauga's facility is able to attract and stage this sort of middle-tier sporting event.

The Hershey Centre:

• ...seats 5400 for hockey in its main bowl.
• ...offers three other ice rinks in addition to the one seating 5,400.
• ...is 15 minutes from the Pearson International Airport.
• ...is easily accessible from Highways 401 and 403.
• ...is located on 160 hectares of land.
• ...New to the site: a 200,000 sq ft indoor sports facility (baseball and soccer), and a home to the Mississauga Gymnastics Club. The facility is spacious enough to allow eight soccer teams, six basketball teams and 100 gymnasts to compete indoors at the same time, while four more soccer teams play outside (citation).

It sounds like a very useful and functional facility, one with lots of future upsides, doesn't it?

How does Kingston's "vision", and the Mayor's sycophants who pine about it, look now? The dysfunctional LVEC has one pad, so no warmup rink, so no chance whatsoever of landing an event like this.

More on the indoor arenas of Mississauga, a city of 700,000.

One of the great things with the recent Google Maps imagery upgrade of the Kingston region is you can easily zoom-in fairly close to many features like, for example, the Memorial Centre and the LVEC site at exactly the same scale. Like this:

We've placed shapes enclosing the two buildings. For the LVEC, we've used one of the available drawings to roughly position and scale it correctly on its undersized lot.

Here's what we get when we superimpose the resulting shapes.

One conclusion is immediately evident: Anyone who thinks the LVEC is a much larger and more functional facility than the Memorial Centre is in for a rude awakening.

The LVEC isn't, in fact, much bigger than the Memorial Centre. The LVEC occupies a minimally larger surface, but inside it must house a bigger bowl, plus luxury suites, more washroom space, more concession space and storage, a sit-down restaurant, and more space for the exclusive use of the Kingston Frontenacs. Moreover its curved outside wall severely limits the functionality of a large portion of the building. All aspects of the LVEC's accessibility and logistics are atrocious in comparison to the Memorial Centre.

We've been reading quite a lot recently about the "vision" thing. Yesterday in The Whig, for example, David Morris had a piece published titled Principles without vision. Read the whole thing; it's funny.

When the LVEC saga finally plays out, it may become evident that it's the wrong building, in the wrong place, a significant drain on the city as opposed to a magical motor of economic development, financed and paid-for by all the wrong people.

History will no doubt properly judge the so-called "visionairies", and those who today tout them. Meanwhile what we're reading is nothing but wishful thinking and a denial of all the evidence that indicates that the LVEC may become an embarassing money-losing white elephant.

"Kingston is an exciting place, thanks to the previous council", says Tony Houghton, again.

Apparently, if Tony Houghton is to be believed, the LVEC is "bound to be a success".

Our collection of Tony Houghton's pro-LVEC pronouncements continues to expand. Here it is:

• August 21 2007: Kingston is an exciting place, thanks to the previous council.
• July 21 2007: Setting priorities is hard when you want to do nothing.
• June 7 2007: A Kingston haunting; Work on the downtown arena has stopped - and it's all because of the boo-birds.
• April 13 2007: Council is burning its bridges before it even builds them, triggering this reply from M.E. Vincent.
• March 6 2007: Were all politicians, unfortunately for the mayor.
• October 15, 2005: North Block a better arena site, making laughable claims about intrinsic merits of grandiose buildings for building's sake. (Ironically, in the very same edition, the The Whig published another article titled Experts dispute belief arenas revitalize downtowns).

Tony Houghton has said quite a lot about the LVEC in the pages of The Whig.

However we don't see Mr Houghton's name, and many others', in the list of donors to the LVEC, nearly four months into the fundraising campaign.

When, or if, Tony Houghton finally contributes it won't be enough.

This is funny: In an editorial about uncertainty surrounding the Modern Fuel art gallery, The Whig today twice calls the LVEC a "convention centre".

The question facing Modern Fuel and city hall is whether the gallery will still "fit" the neighbourhood once the $46.1-million arena and convention centre is completed.

One wonders what they really do at The Whig.

The LVEC is a hockey bowl, with snack bar counters, washrooms, dressing rooms, a restaurant typical of buildings like this, offices for the Kingston Frontenacs, a ticket office, ice-arena operations space, and not much else. Here's a dated diagram of the LVEC's 100 level and one of the LVEC's 200-level.

Convention centre? Where?

Here's today's City press release stating the Sports And Entertainment Centre To Open Feb. 22, 2008. The report in today's Whig says more: the arena won't be finished, just able to host events.

Even better news: On that night, the Kingston Frontenacs should achieve their second sellout crowd in seven full seasons.

There is apparently nothing LVEC-related on tonight's Council agenda.

Considering the laughable lack of communications about the project recently, and also the backlog of bad news that Staff is obviously remiss to admit, things are likely a lot worse than most people imagine right now.

We expect the list of LVEC deceptions will be a long one, and very expensive for Kingston Taxpayers.

Obviously complicit in some of the deception is the City of Kingston's own Communications Department which, in late 2004, created and distributed these fake event tickets for a concert to be held tomorrow.

This was back when arena promoters, many of whom remain today on the City of Kingston payroll (!), were invoking the wholly imagined support of the "silent majority" for constructing the LVEC on Anglin Bay. Today it's hard to imagine a greater disrespect for the taxpayers of Kingston than the way the LVEC project came down.

As then King's Town District Councillor Rick Downes wrote in The Whig Standard on December 21st, 2004:

The usual process of studying a proposal and making a decision after considering reports, studies and expert analysis has been replaced with gunning for the goal at all costs. Never have I seen a better example of realpolitick with the end justifying the means. In my view, the role of the city's Communications department is to present the public with factual information not to win them over with a marketing ploy by printing tickets to a mythical concert. Will the same effort be put into the making the public aware of the parking and traffic studies? The LVEC on the proposed site of Anglin Bay raises serious issues for citizens that live in King's Town, Williamsville and property taxpayers in the rest of the city. The citizens of Kingston have the right to have these issues seriously and objectively studied. If the LVEC is a foregone conclusion, then why are we spending $400,000. 00 of property taxpayers money for reports and studies? I regret that my colleague Councillor Smith, Chair of the LVEC Steering Committee, has given away even the appearance of objectivity by supporting this very biased marketing manoeuvre. The role of councillor is to represent the public interest and represent constituents not to represent private interest and sell a bill of goods to a customer.

KCAL's comment on the fake tickets to the LVEC opening can be found here.

Note the reference to the Kingston Construction Association as sponsors of this ersatz event. Ironic that, in the end, almost none of the LVEC's construction jobs benefit labour from Kingston.

The tickets even allude to "Main Parking" which, even back then, was known to be outright fabrication.

Nevermind the visibly obvious disparities between published plans and the actual project on the ground, today The Whig dutifully reports the city line on the LVEC.

You are looking at a photo of the LVEC site taken on July 23, 2007. Circled is one quadrant of precast seating bowl. We don't know if that section's fully done or not, but we can see only one quadrant.

Photo: Diana Duerkop

How late is this project, really?

The last publicly disclosed project schedule was printed on April 6th and only released at the May 15th Council meeting.

This schedule, which shows early start and early end dates, tells us that:

• This quadrant ("Precast Seating Bowl quadrant 3") should have been complete on May 18th, nearly 10 weeks ago,
• The second quadrant in the list, "Precast Seating Bowl quadrant 4", should have started May 22nd, 9 weeks ago.
• By today (July 24 2007) three full quadrants should be complete.

City staff claims in its reports to Council that the LVEC project is one month behind schedule.

Nobody knows if installing the precast seating bowl is on the critical path for the arena's completion. It certainly looks like the project is further behind schedule than City Staff is letting on.

This news item is for the record, for the benefit of those who may be involved in project forensics and post mortems.

At Council on Tuesday is a 4-page Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre Quarterly Project Management Committee Report Period Ending June 30,2007. This is possibly the least informative quarterly report ever issued in a $50M taxpayer-funded project. No revised schedules, no revised milestones, nothing.

Why? Because this council is a complete pushover.

Correction: Sorry, but Council documents always seem to be a mess. A sharp-eyed reader points out that there is also a 14-page appendix found lower down in the un-indexed, unorganized pile, starting here. Some of the interesting things include:

• Perhaps the first public disclosure of $36,000 in fees for DAV Navion, apparently for Phase 1 of the fundraising campaign.
• City Staff are apparently "Awaiting updated schedule" from Ellis Don. The strikes blamed for delays ended a month ago, on June 24.
• This is funny: The words "Critical Path" appear three times in the whole document, always relating to an administrative milestone titled "Site Plan Approval & Final Building Permit".

As countless serious articles and letters submitted by people raising real concerns and observations about the LVEC go unpublished, The Whig Standard on Saturday contained another article by Tony Houghton, the fourth in the past five months.

Mr Houghton's latest is essentially the same as all his others: trashing the current Council, lauding the previous Council, and telling us that the LVEC will deliver. This time Mr Houghton tells us that the LVEC "will almost certainly expand the commercial tax base".

Right. Time will tell, won't it?

In his article Mr Houghton demonstrates startling ignorance of recent Kingston History. The prior Council went through a consultant-driven "prioritization" process (just as this Council is) which is how the "Group of 7" list was created. The difference is the prior Council clearly blew it, as witnessed by the past municipal election, the results of which Mr Houghton is apparently still having difficulty accepting.

We wonder if this is the same Tony Houghton listed at a downtown address, less than a kilometer from most of Mayor Rosen's boondoggles. If so, Mr Houghton should try imagining how the rest of amalgamated Kingston might view things.

Living within walking distance of most of prior Council's largesse must be nice. Also close to other things like the city's only indoor pool, its transit hub, all city services, the waterfront, libraries, museums, and a refrigerated outdoor skating rink surely counts for something.

Perhaps Mr Houghton should disclose these significant personal benefits in future diatribes against this Council, which evidently has a wider focus than our coddled and grossly over-subsidized Downtown.

No wonder that, for this Council, prioritizing is more involved than it was for the prior Council. It's not just about the BIA anymore.

More in KCAL about Mr Houghton:

• June 7 2007: For the record: apparently The Whig will print any pro-Rosen, pro-LVEC fluff that's submitted
• Council is burning its bridges before it even builds them, April 13, 2007, triggering this reply from M.E. Vincent.
• Were all politicians, unfortunately for the mayor, March 6, 2007

Spot a pattern here? It's the same letter, paraphrased, resubmitted, and dutifully printed by The Whig.

On July 18th 2007, Kingston This Week published this column by KEDCO operative Don Curtis who, no surprise, does not disclose his station within the Downtown Kingston echo chamber.

Secondly, everyone comments on the presence of three institutes of higher learning, (Queen's University, the Royal Military College, St. Lawrence College), the military base, three hospitals (Kingston General Hospital, Hotel Dieu, St. Mary's) a major Cancer Centre, and a variety of city organizations (KEDCO, the Chamber of Commerce, Kingston Accommodation Partners, Downtown Business Improvement Association,) and an enormous resident brain power.

Huh? Read that paragraph again. Read it in context.

It's called collegial self-congratulation and, frankly, Kingstonians have had quite enough of it. Sooner or later this incessant flower tossing will cease.

More on Don Curtis here, here, and here.

Read Attention Wal*Mart Shoppers! over at the Limestoned blog.

On the Administrative Policies Committee agenda, held July 17, 2007: Draft Conflict of Interest Policy.

33 Pages. Read the whole thing.

"Family Member" shall mean

(a) in relation to a Member of Council, means a father, mother, spouse, co-habiting partner, sister, brother, child, step-child, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sister-in-law, or brother-in-law; and.

(b) in relation to Senior Staff and a Committee Member means a father, mother, spouse, cohabiting partner, child;

Long overdue.

In yesterday's Whig "Opinion" column, titled Why I'm donating to the arena, Andrea Gunn writes:

Some community members have made it a goal to hound the sports and entertainment centre project and try to hinder its progress. The centre has been used as a whipping boy for these naysayers, often under the safety of anonymity, so they can air their distrust of government or business, their fear of change or their envy for others.

Despite their efforts, the centre will move ahead. Raising money for a large project can seem an overwhelming task. But those who are passionate about making their community a better place continue to step forward and offer their time, their money, their expertise and their enthusiasm.

Here is a reason why Andrea Gunn feels she should "donate to the arena":

She is currently listed as Policy / Communications Coordinator of the Greater Kingston Chamber of Commerce. Moreover Ms Gunn has been on the front-lines with the Chamber for quite some time.

Hers is a staff-paid position.

It's odd that Ms Gunn only describes herself in The Whig as "works in policy and communications", as opposed to revealing her paid position with the Kingston Chamber of Commerce, a key player in selling the LVEC to the prior Council and the community.

There's more. It appears that Chamber of Commerce staff enjoy privileged access to the Mayor and Council. Yet Ms Gunn spoke at the April 2005 "Have Your Say" LVEC public meeting, televised by COGECO, and she DID NOT disclose her Chamber affiliation.

Watch the video, and hear what she says about the business plan, the Castleglenn parking study, the site (Anglin Bay), the "process", all the jobs that will supposedly be created by the arena, and all the "benefits for the whole community" that we can expect.

Also someone at the Chamber of Commerce (its Communications Coordinator perhaps?) distributed this Chamber of Commerce email with subject "LVEC Update from the Chamber of Commerce". In that email,

1. Kingston's 2008 Memorial Cup bid, and its substantial windfalls, are touted at full-face value, and
2. It asserts that "taxpayers will not be footing the bill for the additional costs if the project goes ahead", thus perpetuating the myth that taxpayers are not on the hook for the LVEC.

LVEC uber-booster Shadoe Davis Leaves K Rock, and leaves town before he's raised much if any of the LVEC money he said he would.

Here's what KCAL has written about Shadoe Davis:

• March 10, 2007: Shadoe Davis schmolkas himself
  
• March 5, 2007: KROCK's Shadoe Davis lies to us. Again.
  
• February 26, 2007: Calling shenanigans on KROCK's Shadoe Davis
  
• February 26, 2007: For the record: KROCK 105FM's pro-LVEC push (with audio)
  
• December 17, 2006: For the record: a Downtown Kingston mouthpiece sounds off

Apparently he won't be around to answer for his share, for which he deserves plenty.

Four comparable buildings, four months.

Your looking at just 14 planned events in total, booked into 368 total possible event-days.

(That count includes 2 job-fair dates and one "walk of Fame" ceremony as "events").

That's reality: An average of 3.8% planned public booking for fabulous "events" in LVECs in four Ontario cities over three months, a full quarter.

The same company that runs Mississauga's Hershey Centre will run Kingston's LVEC. They have 7.6% planned public bookings for Q3 2007, this quarter, in Mississauga.

Thank God this LVEC turkey wasn't built right on Kingston's waterfront, as originally conceived.

In addition to several meetings worth of deferred items, the LVEC's 1000-extra seats are up for discussion next Tuesday night.

The recommendation is to spend an extra $384,100 to for rough-ins (like washroom facilities for an extra thousand people), and delay the actual installation of the seats. Note that this item is, no surprise, buried starting on page 101 of a 115-page Council document.

Elsewhere on the Council Agenda, we have these items:

• Staff want to sell the property at 5 Brock Street, a prime piece of Kingston Downtown waterfront, which is currently about 30 years into a 50-year lease to the Confederation Place Hotel.

  This property is adjacent to the Downtown docks, Confederation Basin, Confederation Park, City Hall, and Market Square. That property may be surplus to current City operations, but it's still prime commonwealth land.

  The only imagined buyer? An immediate past KEDCO board member and, therefore, an LVEC influence peddler. He's an ultimate Downtown Kingston insider.

  How else does this relate to the LVEC? How do you think City reserves sometimes get replenished?

• Closely related: Apparently Downtown Kingston, not content with its systemically priviledged position within and around City Hall, requires even more face-time with Councillors in the form of two or more Council representatives on the "Downtown Action Plan Core Committee".

  

  Downtown Kingston is hoovering money from the rest of Amalgamated Kingston, to the point of appointing already overworked Councillors to do more service for them, and to effectively do their bidding.

  You could drive a truck through The Downtown Action Plan and, indeed, they are. A Brink's truck.

  Maybe instead Downtown Kingston should form its own closed committee, and then come to Council and get in line, just like everybody else, just like any other neighborhood, or any other region of this city.

  Appointing Councillors to further serve Downtown? Downtown Kingston's rubber-stamps on Council are Mayor Rosen, and Councillors Smith, Foster, Hector, and Gerretsen. Pick two.

  Otherwise someone like Councillor Schmolka could be next in line to go in there and really draw the line here. It's likely to be a serious haircut because influence and spending on goodies for downtown Kingston is already disproportionate, and way out of control.

  Another option might be to bring the movement of the DAP forward from the "Task Force" stage up for a vote, and fully stop the madness. The adoption of the DAP seems immune from any sort of "process" right now. A done deal, as it were, moving straight from fuzzy conception to cheque-writing stages with no Council oversight in between.

  Icing the DAP until the full physical and financial extent of the LVEC mistake is more fully understood might be very sensible. Nobody can discard the possibility that the LVEC's operations will not cover its costs. A large part of the DAP's money might be required to butteress a perpetually bleeding LVEC for the next 30 years.

The LVEC's Latest Campaign Donors List appears to have been recently updated, though it no longer shows the amounts donated.

The total raised so far, after three whole months of campaigning: a whopping $386,006.41, well shy of the $2M target, from just 63 different donations listed.

Mayor Rosen still needs to raise the equivalent of about 210 more such events, and that's just for the "fundraising" shortfall.

If this Council had any teeth (it doesn't) it would require LVEC project managers to create and fund a contingency for "fundraising", which is obviously floundering, in the amount of about a million dollars. We all know how this scam will play out: taxpayers will fund all these shortfalls, and the BIA and the Springer family will be subsidized yet again, which is scandalous.

You'll recall that:

• At that time, April 2005, the LVEC was to be built on Kingston's waterfront, displacing MetalCraft Marine, a local aluminum fireboat and patrol boat builder that, at the time, employed between 50 and 60 skilled workers and, in the process, also would have clobbered Kingston Marina, one of Kingston's last two remaining marine service yards.
• The LVEC was being rammed-through by the BIA, whose spokespeople front-end loaded delegates to this meeting, nevermind their priority access at many other Council meetings and their systemic guaranteed face-time with members of Council. If this meeting was about input from the public, the BIA and meeting chairman Councillor Ed Smith obviously had other ideas.
• The LVEC "Have Your Say" public meeting was located in the heart of the BIA area (City Hall).
• The LVEC "Have Your Say" public meeting was called, chaired, and controlled by a member of the BIA Board of Directors (Councillor Ed Smith) who...
• ...less than 12 hours later, as chairman of the somnolent LVEC Steering Committee, Councillor Ed Smith rubber-stamped pre-determined recommendations forwarded to Council which included no acknowledgement whatsoever, not a word, of widespread public concerns about the whole project, not just its original waterfront site.
• 5-months later, on September 20th 2005, after at least $500,000 was wasted, the current North Block LVEC site was hastily chosen just three days after a mountain of documents was published on September 17th 2005, less than 100 hours prior to that crucial Council meeting that leaves us today with this white elephant. At the time the arena was supposed to cost $37.3 Million.

It appears therefore that COGECO Kingston has preserved this low-water mark in local politics and, more importantly, preserved Councillor Ed Smith's pivotal role in the boondoggle that is still, to this day, known as the LVEC.

The Limestoned blog has an excellent take on tonights "Free LVEC fundraising concert"

Here in the Limestone City, Corus Entertainment is hosting a free concert that is supposed to be a fundraising vehicle for the North Block Coliseum, with the proceeds of T-shirt sales going to the fundraising. Here's where it get's interesting - the T-shirts are emblazoned with the logo of FM 98 - a new FM station launched by Corus the other day. And newsprint advertisement in yesterday's Whig Standard announcing the concert never mentioned the fundraising end of it. So FM98 T-shirts will be for sale tonight in Springer Market Square for $7 and FM98 gets walking billboards for their cause - advertising their new radio station.

Who's dupin' who? At least the Mohawks are calling a spade a spade.

Indeed.

BEFORE YOU FOLLOW THE LINK: after two months of campaigning, guess how many "Fan"-level donations (0 to $99) the LVEC has received. 50? 100? 500? 1000? Make a mental guess before you check.

A page titled Latest Campaign Donors List is online at the City website.

More evidence of rookie project management: City staff are apparently pointing fingers for cost hikes to come. In fact, the LVEC project was obviously very late long before the strikes that made things just a little worse.

Heh. It happens all the time.

City CAO Glen Laubenstein must believe we are all stupid.

Chief administrative officer Glen Laubenstein said consultants are asked to qualify or clarify statements to make things clear, but never to change findings.

"You hire consultants to give you the brutal, hard facts," Laubenstein said.

CKWS-TV today reports that the LVEC's opening date is officially pushed back to mid-February 2008.

Strikes are blamed, but KCAL's take is the project was more than a month late before the strikes.

It looks like the hapless Kingston Frontenacs officially lose about half their 2007-08 regular-season LVEC dates. We aren't sure the Frontenacs will play any regular-season games in the LVEC in 2007-08.

The 5,100-seat Guelph Sports & Entertainment Centre, which opened in 2000, will be known as the Sleeman Centre through 2020. The deal, valued at $1.2-million over 13 years, runs from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2020.

That works out to $92,000 per year. The centre will sell only Sleeman draught beer, as well as local Sleeman brands sold in bottles or cans.

The city decides to delay LVEC-related construction near the LVEC until later this year.

The Ministry of Labour is probing another accident on the LVEC site.

The 2007-08 OHL schedule is out and the Frontenacs home schedule is back-end loaded, which is sensible.

Here are the games the Kingston Frontenacs are nominally supposed to play in the LVEC, which total 16 games from Jan 18 2008.

The project is late; start crossing out games. Four weeks late, which is what managers have admitted, means delete about 9 games. The project actually looks closer than 8 or more weeks late, and that's getting worse, not better. In that case, how many games remain on the list?

Total contingency for this loss of revenue for the LVEC: zero. Who's on the hook? Taxpayers, for one-hundred percent of it.

Fri. Jan. 18 Ottawa at Kingston, 7:30
Sun. Jan. 20 Belleville at Kingston, 4:00
Fri. Jan. 25 Niagara at Kingston, 7:30
Sun. Jan. 27 Windsor at Kingston, 2:00
Fri. Feb. 1 Oshawa at Kingston, 7:30
Fri. Feb. 8 Barrie at Kingston, 7:30
Sun. Feb. 10 Plymouth at Kingston, 2:00
Wed. Feb. 13 Oshawa at Kingston, 7:00
Fri. Feb. 15 London at Kingston, 7:30
Fri. Feb. 22 Belleville at Kingston, 7:30
Sun. Feb. 24 Peterborough at Kingston, 2:00
Fri. Feb. 29 Barrie at Kingston, 7:30
Sun. Mar. 2 Mississauga at Kingston, 2:00
Fri. Mar. 7 Oshawa at Kingston, 7:30
Wed. Mar. 12 Ottawa at Kingston, 7:00
Fri. Mar. 14 Sudbury at Kingston, 7:30

This from the Frontenacs website home page.

.

We know the lowest reported number of tickets sold in 2006-2007 season was 1788 on Oct 15, 2006 against Saginaw.

If we generously assume that ALL those were season tickets, then the increase in season tickets is certainly under 750. It's probably closer to 500 or less.

How pathetic is that? The Memorial Centre, whose average excess capacity was 1050 in 2006-2007 has ample space to host this turkey of a hockey team, one that's managed just one sellout in the past six years.

The Frontenacs sweetheart deal with the City doesn't scale downwards. The Frontenacs pay ZERO base rent, you see, and if nobody shows up they don't pay a penny. Nothing for the office space, nothing for the free run of the place, and nothing for the street-level retail shop they've been given by City of Kingston "negotiators".

The deal doesn't scale upwards either: whether the LVEC comes in at $50 Million or $60 Million, the Frontenacs don't pay a dime more or a dime less for controlling the place.

Plain and simple: The Citizens of Kingston are subsidizing, of all people, the Springer family. Moreover the Citizens of Kingston are assuming ALL the downside risks.

How revolting is that?

What's even more revolting is this council is still taking counsel from the same Staff who created this mess, and there's no chance of independent oversight.

Update: We've received feedback from season ticket holders that indicate that 2006-2007 season ticket numbers are under 1000, and that the early-bird renewal numbers are probably around 600. So a "41% increase" would indicate about 250 extra season tickets.

This is all speculation, of course.

More clear indication that the LVEC opening is going to be very, very late (starting on page 33 -- buried as usual). Count how many items are "behind schedule".

We've know this for a long time already. Meanwhile the item on the May 12th Council Agenda, the grossly late project schedule report (Dated April 6th, not May 6th), still hasn't made it to Council.

One clear and undeniable sign of rookie project management: Planning to catch up later. Another is denial.

From the City of Kingston website home page.

From the City of Kingston website home page.

Apparently,

National companies appear to be lining up to put their name to Kingston's new sports and entertainment centre.

From the June 12 2007 edition of The Heritage: Naming rights to LVEC won't be final until the fall, say staff

Kim Mitchell And April Wine To Perform Free LVEC Concert, Friday, June 29, 6:30 - 10:00 p.m at Market Square. Commemorative T-shirts of the event will be sold at the concert with all proceeds going toward the arena project.

It's concurrent with Fanfayre craft show, which runs Thursday through Saturday.

Update:CKWS reports that Corus Kingston, CKWS-TV's company, is footing the full bill for the Concert and t-shirts.

MIKE

"WE REALLY SUPPORT WHAT THE CITY IS DOING. WE ARE REALLY PROUD OF THIS SPRINGER MARKET SQUARE AND WE ARE REALLY PROUD TO SEE THE LVEC GOING UP AS FAST AS IT IS. AND WE WANT TO SHOW OUR SUPPORT FOR THOSE THINGS AND THIS IS OUR WAY OF DOING IT.

... which, in hindsight, explains a lot.

Corus Entertainment and Joe Fm, both listed at 170 Queen St, are the only businesses in the 'Radio/TV Stations' section of the Downtown Kingston BIA.

One year ago here at KCAL.ca:

June 6, 2006: The first LVEC KPMG report is released just one week AFTER a critical May 30th 2006 Council vote on the LVEC. You'll recall a subsequent and worse LVEC KPMG report which was kept on ice for weeks, until shortly AFTER the November 2006 municipal election.

June 8, 2006: City of Kingston's statement of taxpayer immunity, an item that is no longer available on the City of Kingston website, knowingly removed (or buried) by Paul MacLatchy, P.Eng (Director, Strategy, Environment & Communications) despite protests from KCAL.

June 9, 2006: Entertainment facilities ineligible for development charges, where it appears that using development charges for financing things like the LVEC may be illegal.

Also in that piece, this snippet tells us a lot about the quality of project management at the City of Kingston. From the LVEC Design-Build documents (the Business Plan part deux) :

KCAL raised a stink about this inadequate contingency. It was later admitted that LVEC project contingency was determined by the available budget envelope, and not as the result of any sort of risk review.

Two years ago:

On June 9, 2005, the LVEC project was still on Anglin Bay, and there was a clear misrepresentation of MetalCraft Marine in a planning committee report to Council, which described it this way:

The central portion of the site is comprised of 347 and 349 Wellington Street. These properties are currently being used for industrial marine purposes, specifically boat repairs and maintenance.

... not that, at that time, MCM employed 50 skilled workers, and they continue to design, build, and export multi-million dollar fireboats and patrol boats, all of it from 347 and 349 Wellington Street.

Metalcraft Marine: "specifically boat repairs and maintenance". Can you imagine?

A public meeting on the LVEC was held June 9, 2005 in Artillery Park Gymnasium.

On June 10 2005, the next day, we saw Harvey Rosen talking about the possible expropriation of Metalcraft Marine on CKWS-TV news.

So things were clearly out of control in June 2005.

The budgeted cost for the LVEC was then still the $28.5 million estimate from the Task Force report. It wasn't until Sept 20 2005, three months later, that we learned the LVEC was supposed to cost $37.3 million.

Today the LVEC project has been sitting officially at $46 million for a while. We're overdue for a sharp upwards revision of that.

Today The Whig reports that Mayor Rosen will announce a LVEC fundraising concert on Monday.

Back in September 2004, The Tragically Hip, Mathew Good, The Hugh Dillion Redemption Choir, The Trews, The Sadies, James McKenty & The Spades, Chris Koster and host Dan Aykroyd plus about 600 volunteers raised $355,555 for The Community Foundation of Greater Kingston, the Joe Chithalen Musical Instrument Lending Library and Camp Trillium, all worthy causes, at the Across the Causeway concert.

If the latest reports are accurate, the mayor still must raise about $1.63 million to achieve his long-known requirement for LVEC fundraising.

In other words, he needs the equivalent of about five Across the Causeway concerts.

As countless serious articles and letters submitted by people raising real concerns and observations about the LVEC go unpublished, The Whig today features this fluff by Tony Houghton in its Forum section. Read the whole thing.

The headline, which we assume is coined by a Whig editor, implies the province-wide labour strike is due to some members of this Council.

A Kingston haunting; Work on the downtown arena has stopped - and it's all because of the boo-birds

More on the LVEC from Mr Houghton:

• Council is burning its bridges before it even builds them, April 13, 2007, triggering this reply from M.E. Vincent.
• Were all politicians, unfortunately for the mayor, March 6, 2007

Spot a pattern here?

Incidentally, there's another bogus headline in today's Whig, on page 6, in a story about the recent $25,000 donation by Walter Fenlon to the LVEC. The headline implies that fundraising campaigns (plural) for City Projects have exceeded their goals. This is an obvious misrepresentation of the facts.

The Grand Theatre campaign jacked its fundraising goal after the project went several million dollars over budget. That goal has not been reached. The headline, in an article that refers to all the City's major projects, says the plural opposite. That's just dishonest.

See more past LVEC-related gross financial misrepresentations by The Whig from February 20th, 2007.

Today the City of Kingston trumpets a $25,000 donation from Walter Fenlon towards the LVEC.

So what's the total so far toward the $2 million required?

Fenlon's contribution brings the total raised during the current campaign for the Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre to $368,000.

That's all??

Consider that $200k from Brit Smith, $50k from Bill Dalton, $50k from Harvey Rosen, and now $25k from Walter Fenlon, this means that the LVEC's fundraising efforts have so-far collected only $43k from the rest of the city combined, which includes all the Downtown Kingston movers who helped railroad this project.

There's more: Walter Fenlon is a leader of the Grand Theatre renovation project which currently has a fundraising shortfall of its own. Then there's the considerable Market Square fundraising shortfall and its bleak prosects resulting from its disgraceful dealings.

Back to the LVEC: All we need is the equivalent of just 65 more Walter Fenlons, or for 32 more Bill Daltons (who gave $50,000) to fulfill a requirement that's been known since September 2005. That's just for the LVEC.

Throw in the other projects' shortfalls, and the conclusion appears inescapable: Kingston's business community is evidently tapped-out, and apparently unable to rise to its own so-called "vision", unless that vision is "stiff the taxpayers" which, in that case, it is overachieving spectacularly.

There's more: just wait until acknowledgement of LVEC rising costs appear, and LVEC revenues don't fully materialize, and the phantasmagoric benefits of the LVEC don't, in fact, roll-in.

Is Downtown Kingston prepared for the city-wide fallout that's coming from all that?

Another labour dispute has shut down LVEC construction.

It's becoming clear now, given these delays and the widening disconnect between published schedules and what's actually visible on the construction site, that the Kingston Frontenacs may not play any 2007-2008 regular season games in the LVEC.

The OHL regular season typically ends in mid-March, and the LVEC construction looks to be fully 8-weeks behind the plan that timelines to the mid-January opening target. As for April, the Kingston Frontenacs haven't played a home hockey game in April since 1998.

There's more: we're hearing from all quarters, and all the evidence overwhelmingly appears to support this: City of Kingston staff, from the CAO on down, apparently don't have what it takes to be executing this project.

There is an interesting and long-overdue LVEC motion on page 22 of Tuesday's Council agenda.

Finally some recognition of the flawed way the LVEC has been "planned", and the shortcuts taken so far, especially with respect to traffic, which KCAL has been saying, with supporting documentation, for a long time now.

Our prediction: Council with Mayor Rosen chairing, inept meeting manager he's proving to be, won't get to this item this Tuesday.

It took less than one month for the City's feeble LVEC fundraising campaign to completely dissapear from the City Of Kingston's internet home page.

First the LVEC was rammed through with public consultation theatre and Downtown Kingston shenanigans, and now we're pretty sure we can say the same thing about the $2M fundraising effort. From its inception, this was horse manure used to sell this dodgy misguided project to former Council membere who, on balance, either got tossed from office or lacked the stomach to run again.

This council: a complete pushover. Taxpayers will cover the shortfall because Downtown Kingston doesn't have to. The whole project was done with a backroom wink and a smile. "Put down $2M for fundraising, that should do it".

Here's the list of the people and companies who contributed $125 or more to Harvey Rosen's mayoral campaign. We're interested to see who among them has, and who hasn't, stepped-up in support the money-Mayor's LVEC boondoggle.

Also, where's the big fundraising thermometer graphic showing us all how well it's going, the progress towards the Big Goal? Don't hold your breath.

A worker was injured on the LVEC site on Friday, shutting down construction, and apparently more construction strikes are to be expected.

According to TheStar.com: Wages behind crane strike.

Large-scale building projects across Ontario slowed Wednesday as about 2,000 crane and other heavy-equipment operators went on strike to push for more money and stave off work-day changes their employers want to make.

Within hours of the walkout, construction at sites as diverse as a hospital in North Bay, an expansion at the Toyota plant in Woodstock and a power project in the port lands of Toronto were affected, with predictions of more to come.

Yes LVEC construction, unofficially months behind schedule (also here), is affected.

Just in time for the LVEC fundraising push which, for some reason (stupidity?), only got started this month and, by all accounts, is already stalled: Construction Woes.

Mayor Harvey Rosen and our Chief of Police: two people who clearly aren't up-to-speed on the LVEC dossier. Read the whole thing.

Both are apparently unaware that:

• The final traffic and parking study is an apparent fudge. The first parking and traffic study was even worse. The end result is even more policing and traffic control will be required than these two wishful thinkers apparently imagine.
• The facility operator, Arcturus SMG, has already told Council that operators normally pay promoters in addition to providing the venue for free or nearly free to bring-in the premium acts that the LVEC is supposed to present. Moreover, if other similar Canadian facilities managed by Arcturus are any indication, event bookings are sparse if nearly non-existent, so saddling policing costs into the mix will surely doom any chance the LVEC has of attracting much quality entertainment, which severely hurts the thin prospects of profitability.
• The sweetheart agreement with the Kingston Frontenacs, who are expected to fill between a quarter and a third of LVEC events (though over half of the events is more likely) does not provide for them to bear any such costs whatsoever.

But what the Chief may be saying is: "don't expect to use the Police budget to hide KRSEC operating expenses".

That's good, but how is this supposed to work in practice? Is the Chief of Police really able to further maroon the Mayor, who has already grossly overplayed his hand in the LVEC boondoggle?

Let's keep an eye on this to ensure that the full operational costs of the LVEC accrue to the LVEC. Let's ensure that those who manufactured the pretense of rich benefits, and those who manufactured the pretense of public support for the project, are properly held to account.

The unrealized donation budget of over $1.2M is an aggressive one that carries considerable risk of not being attained as the project nears completion.

Read the May 2007 LVEC / KRSEC project status report which goes to Council on Tuesday, including the charts that start on page 68.

Take note that the project schedule charts are dated April 6th, more than a month out of date already.

Considering these reports are available at a touch of a button from the project management software, the schedule presented at the May 15th Council meeting should be dated May 6th, not April 6th.

When this project is examined in retrospect, if there is any suspicion that Staff has misled Council, one need only look back at this period and realize that what Council is being told is grossly stale.

All this apparently passes for project status reporting in the Harvey Rosen and Glen Laubenstein era.

The City of Kingston pays quite a lot for software, information technology, and project consultants. Month-old stale project schedules are outrageous.

Despite its strong and unambiguous electoral mandate, why is this Council such a pushover?

CKWS-TV reports that, so far, no bites on the LVEC's naming rights.

See also: The LVEC / KRSEC brand in peril.

• Here's a link to the Mid-April LVEC project status report from Staff to Council. This document was already about a month out-of-date when it was presented. The document contains a project timeline that was sloppily copied and borderline unreadable. It was, however, all it took for this Council to cave.
• Here's a link to a CLEANED-UP READABLE VERSION of the timelines from the mid-April LVEC project status report.
• Here's a link to an annotated version of the readable timelines, one that highlights the tasks that should already be finished, tasks that should be already started, and arrows pointing to some tasks that are obviously very late already.
• If you can't drive past the site to see for yourself, here's a link to the City's "Arenaview Web Cam".

Judge for yourself.

Based on this 2-month old project document, the LVEC project appears to be 8 to 12 weeks late. They are nowhere near to be working on "Interior Finishes" for example. The structural steel aspects look to be far more behind schedule than staff has been letting on.

In the snippets below, what's yellow should be already (or very soon to be) finished. In purple is what should be (or very soon to be) started. Red arrows point to some visibly and obviously lagging tasks.

Don't miss this funny Heritage article by Bill Hutchins about how some Councillors feel about donating to the LVEC fundraising campaign.

Harvey Rosen certainly appears to be oblivious to the difficulty he faces in raising United-Way-scale dollars for his LVEC boondoggle.

Here's a roundup of recent news stories about Kitchener's selection to host the 2008 Memorial Cup.

• The Whig is running the standard Canadian Press story on page-one of its sports section. That article is NOT available on The Whig's website and, just as we predicted yesterday, The Whig makes no mention that Kitchener's won the bid with arena was built in 1950 and renovated in 2001-2002 for under $10M.
• From the Kitchener Record: It's official; Memorial Cup coming to Kitchener, and Pressure's on to beat the best, and a 9-minute video of the announcement and post-announcement interviews.
• Also from the Kitchener Record: More fans than tickets. Therein:

  Bienkowski said the Rangers' organization didn't have to pre-sell tickets to demonstrate fan support to the tournament selection committee.

  "We were one the few bidders that didn't pre-sell tickets," Bienkowski said.

  "I felt I had nothing to prove to the selection committee. I stood up and said: 'We've had 238 consecutive standing-room-only crowds. That's six years of consecutive games.' So they are quite aware of the support we have, and that's a huge factor," Bienkowski said.

  Read that again: 'We've had 238 consecutive standing-room-only crowds. That's six years of consecutive games.' Compare that to the pathetic performance, one sellout, by the Kingston Frontenacs over the same 6-year period.

• From Sarnia: Sarnia loses cup bid. Three consecutive shuns for Sarnia, and they may not bid again.
• From the London Free Press: OHL does its homework. This one is interesting because it outlines all the elements of London's impressive bid, which in the end didn't win. Read the whole thing. The same article appears on Canoe Slam Sports.

  LONDON'S MEMORIAL CUP BID

  Key components of the London Knights bid for the 2008 Memorial Cup tournament.

  • Financial guarantee: $1.8 million
  • Projected profit: $2.2 million to $2.4 million
  • Corporate support to date of presentation: $600,000
  • Volunteers: 700
  • Presold ticket packages: 10,500
  • Theme: Celebration of the history of the Ontario Hockey League.
  • Components: Creation of an OHL Hall of Fame. Inductees to include all-time Western and Eastern Conference teams voted on by fans and media; Red Tilson Award winners; Bill Long Award winners, top coaches; plus one player nomination per team for each 10 years of existence.
  • OHL Avenue: Outside John Labatt Centre 20 tents, one for each OHL team dedicated to team history, colours, sweaters and tradition.
  • OHL Alumni Association: Creation of alumni association including compilation of statistics for players and a data base of contact information.
  • OHL Foundation: Create and fund a charitable foundation to help members of the extended OHL family with $100,000 from the Memorial Cup.
  • OHL coaches' conference: Honour and bring back OHL coaches to meet and discuss coaching with minor hockey coaches.
  • OHL alumni appreciation concert: Day following the Memorial Cup final.
  • OHL alumni hockey and softball games: Fundraisers for the OHL foundation.
  • Junkies lounge: Place for the hard-core junkies who travel to all Memorial Cup tournaments to hang out.

From the Toronto Star: The 2008 Memorial Cup awarded to Kitchener.

Kitchener, you will recall, has the Kitchener Memorial Auditorium, which was built in 1950, and renovated in 2001-2002 for less than $10 Million. We're betting that this fact will escape Whig-Standard coverage tomorrow.

All this is very embarassing for Mayor Harvey Rosen. But it's not over: the LVEC situation is about to get much worse for him.

This is the building we're all supposed to be "building together".

Here are interesting facts about this diagram:

• It's the first one available to the public.
• It's incomplete. The East and West ends of the building are cropped off.
• It's eight months old, dated September 16th 2006.
• It's from the Frontenacs' website (and very well buried there), not from the City.
• No mention of this seating layouts, or any other technical drawing for that matter, were made at Council's major briefing on Dec 18 2006. But Councillors were instead shown photos of Oshawa's luxury suites, and photos of the Oshawa arena's restaurant, as evidence of progress on "our" project.
• Note that seats are 19, 20, 21, or 22 inches wide. These widths are scattered about (zoom-in).
• There will be 16-17 rows of seats. (ED: How many rows does the Mem Centre have?)
• LVEC seats fill-in close to the boards, unlike the vast rinkside walkway at the Memorial Centre.
• It's not a smooth rounded bowl. Think jagged straight rows of seats in the corners.
• You'll likely be climbing several stairs up to get to the bowl. Unlike virtually all other modern hockey bowls, Kingston's LVEC does not go below grade at all, which is another of the many lousy attributes of the North Block site.
• No luxury suite detail.
• And no, it's not this, which is from the diagrams released by The City in September 2006.

Remember, you saw it here first.

Are the taxpayers of Kingston really stakeholders in this whole project? Do you think this might affect fundraising a little? A lot?

Click here for the 8-month old detailed LVEC seating chart in PDF form.

It's taken TWO MONTHS since the release of a DVA Navion's fundraising report on $2M LVEC fundraising for the City to put up a 450-word web page on the matter.

We're not talking about an online donation mechanism. That would be too sensible, and far too convenient. What we have instead is a 1-page PDF that folks will presumably download, print, complete, and mail or fax to City Hall, where some paid City employee will spend several minutes manually processing each and every single one.

There's more: it's taken THIRTEEN MONTHS since DVA Navion was first retained, in April 2006, for the LVEC fundraising web page to appear.

The $2M fundraising goal has been a known requirement since September 20 2005, some TWENTY MONTHS ago.

For those who may be wondering, it takes about an hour to set up test, and deploy a simple web page with donation buttons leading to reputable online payment services such as Google Checkout or PayPal or others, which accept all major credit cards, seamlessly process transactions in Canadian dollars, and with service charges comparable to standard credit card transactions.

Something like this should have been online on September 21st, 2005.

"Boondoggle, Appearing Live, Every Sunday Night at The Merchant Taphouse". The silhouette in the poster is the LVEC as it looks today.

The Merchant's website appears to be offline at the moment, so no link.

The definition of Boondoggle: a North American term referring to the performance of useless or trivial tasks whilst appearing to be doing something important.

See also Boondoggle (project) and White elephant.

Or how about 28,900 Rolling Stones videos, for free, instantaneously, just a click or two away?

How digital is your LVEC gamble, your so-called motor of economic development?

Previously:

• Dec 15 2006: 384 Tragically Hip videos on YouTube
• Sep 22 2006: 152 Tragically Hip videos on YouTube

Back on April 21st The Whig published this spread that tries to answer questions posed by readers.

Any doubt that The Whig is acting as little more than a boardroom bulletin publisher for the project are dispelled by beauts like this:

Do any streets have to have work done on them - e.g., widened - to accommodate the extra traffic?

No streets will be widened around the centre. The city has actually been widening sidewalks in the area to make it more pedestrian friendly. Surrounding streets, buildings and intersections, including Place D'Armes and Ontario Street that will become signalized for two-way traffic ($155,000), will be worked on, at a total cost of $3,686,205 (all numbers from the 2007 budget). About $1.2 million was spent in the 2006 budget. According to a city staff report, $222,355 needs to be spent to have the centre open on time, while $3,463,850 is being spent as part of the downtown action plan for the North Block.

Then there's this:

Will there be recreational skating?

There won't be recreational skating time at the arena. Anyone will be able to rent the ice surface when it is available and there could be community events that will open the ice up to the public for skating.

And this:

I hear different prices. How has the price tag changed since the arena was first approved at the original site?

The only budget council approved was for the North Block at an original price tag of $41.77 million. A $4.345-million cost overrun brought the total approved budget to more than $46.1 million.

Earlier costs for the Anglin Bay site that was once under consideration were never approved by council.

The estimated cost for a facility at Anglin Bay was $28.5 million in March 2004, then $37.45 million in September 2005.

That's incorrect. Earlier costs for the North Block LVEC were, in fact, approved by Council. Read the September 20 2005 Council minutes where a motion with specific wording related to $37.3M costs which, at the time, included $8M coverage from upper levels of Government.

Is The Whig's duplicitous in distorting the LVEC's historical record? Why these powder-puff answers to softball questions?

Ottawa approves $1.4M bailout for Bell Sensplex

It works out to about $500k per year.

It was built with financing from a group of private companies, but the city guaranteed the debt through the Municipal Capital Facilities Agreement. The city also waived the facility's property taxes and development charges, buys 2,400 hours of ice time annually from the facility to resell to the public and contributes $250,000 each year to the facility's operating reserve.

It's another one of those 30-year agreements. Read the whole thing.

Identical circles placed over London, Oshawa, and Kingston at night. As stark as this looks, it's worse: everything South East of Kingston is over the border.

Here's a roundup of some of the news stories today about the 2008 Memorial Cup bid presentations, which happened yesterday.

• Knights deliver Cup pitch
• Generals and Rangers in front?
• Kitchener 2008 Memorial Cup bid
• Millions at stake in Spirit bid for hockey tournament

The Site Selection Committee will award the 2008 CHL Memorial Cup the week of May 7.

This week Councillor Mark Gerretsen withdrew the motion that would have ensured some accountability for the LVEC project.

Hands-up if you think this Council has, in the end, turned out to be a complete pushover.

Yesterday's letter in The Whig from M.E. Vincent, in response to recent Whig "Opinion" pieces, is right on.

The new councillors have also been blamed for Kingston's unsuccessful Memorial Cup bid (how ridiculous is that?), for the difficulty in attracting donations for the Market Square project and for picking on city hall staff. They have been called "naive," "parochial" and, obliquely, anti-Semitic. There has been despicable namecalling going on by people who should know better. All in print, of course. The new councillors have had the class not to answer in kind.

Why was there so much venom because the new councillors insisted on seeing the September, 2006 report on the downtown sports and entertainment centre project - a report that, shamefully, had been held back? Why have they been criticized for showing disgust over the renaming of Market Square and the arrogance that is still being exhibited over this matter? Why are they being criticized for wanting more accountability from city staff regarding money paid out and the arena?

It's sad that anybody would criticize these people for trying to protect our interests rather than special interests. Every time they attempt to get information from city hall, though, I read about the dire consequences predicted by chief administrative officer Glen Laubenstein. It makes me wonder what he's afraid of.

That's just a sample. Read the whole thing.

Here's the Project Status Report: Kingston Regional Sports & Entertainment Centre which is part of the Council package for tonight's televised meeting.

Yesterday's Whig reports that the LVEC project is behind schedule because of structural steel work.

In fact, here are some of the things listed as "behind schedule" in the report:

• Final Building Permit
• 100% Design Drawing. This has been listed at "95%" for months now.
• Structural steel
• Archaeological

Oddly, "Fundraising" is listed as "on schedule", though everyone knows that should have started months ago.

And FINALLY the public is shown a detailed project schedule with milestones. Too bad the person who scanned it was sloppy: It's barely legible! Click the image to see for yourself, starting on page 39. Note that these diagrams are already about a month out of date.

The City of Kingston continues it's unbroken streak of LVEC opacity and pretense of public consultation with a mystery "public" meeting to be held at an undisclosed location tonight about the reconstruction of Place d'Armes and Ontario Streets.

Here's what the City calendar web page says today about it. No link, no meeting location is disclosed.

Moreover there is nothing about this meeting in the City's LVEC project pages.

After inquiring, we've been told two things:

1. The meeting is in the Wilson Room of the Kingston Public Library, 130 Johnson street, and
2. project director Lanie Hurdle won't attend.

In today's Whig, the author of the "Opinion" piece titled Council is burning its bridges before it even builds them is the same person who wrote We're all politicians, unfortunately for the mayor on March 6th, and the same person figures among those 27% pro-LVEC in our Whig Letter Tally who, evidently, still pretend to represent a majority view.

Somewhat related to this, The Whig's new Community Editorial Board, announced last week, appears disproportionately drawn from the Downtown Kingston echo-chamber.

As amalgamated Kingston gradually shifts away from being controlled by Downtown Kingston interests, how much angst will be seen and heard from these quarters?

Which pre-amalgamation partner had this angst about "getting things done" development? Kingston Township? Pittsburgh Township? Or Kingston, specifically Downton Kingston?

Why, then, is this angst being projected over all of amalgamated Kingston? Whose complex is this, anyway?

Clearly this has been Harvey Rosen's schtick since before the November election. Is it getting old? How does it serve as a framework for solving the myriad real and chronic problems in our city?

The City has posted the measly 2-page Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre Update, Issue #5. This one is dated on Good Friday.

• The luxury suites are not yet fully subscribed,
• selling the naming rights looks to be a long slog, and
• next month fundraising is supposed to start in earnest, having so-far raised just 1.3% of the $2M required.

That's it. No drawings. The public still has never been shown drawings of the luxury suite level, details of its private entrance, or drawings that conclusively show all those great meeting spaces that this disfunctional building just doesn't have.

Bruce Todd told everyone this in September 2006 about the traffic and parking report prepared by LVEC project consultants, IBI:

THE CONCEPT OF "DISPERSED" PARKING IS NOT EVEN RECOGNIZED IN MAINSTREAM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING.

Meanwhile, The Kingston Whig Standard slept through the whole thing.

That's not the only thing Bruce Todd said. There's more.

September 18, 2006

The main points that I have trouble with are the following -

(1) IBI sticks to their assumption that people will be willing to walk 600 metres (straight line - 700 to 800 metres actual) to events, despite data which has studied the movements of people and advises a maximum 500 metres for tolerable walking distances. They don't give their sources because they don't have any.

(2) IBI uses information from the CastleGlenn Report (also here) despite the fact that that report has never received final approval, and that is not ethically correct in my opinion.

(3) IBI does not take into consideration the narrow sidewalks surrounding this site, and the consequences (safety aspects) of these sidewalks regarding pedestrian flows, and this is a major oversight for a Traffic Impact Study.

(4) IBI stresses the positive effects of people leaving the area after an event from several parking areas rather than one big one (supposedly with few exits), but says very little about the difficulties of finding parking in the first place when it is spread out in small areas. The concept of "dispersed" parking is not even recognized in mainstream traffic engineering. The big problem with such a scheme is creating hundreds of trips to parking lots only to find they are full, with the resultant driver frustration and unsafety this can cause.

(5) IBI has not shown a similar case of so-called "dispersed" parking for anyone to judge whether it can work or not.

(6) IBI insists it has studied the parking supply on a Friday night in Kingston around 6-7 p.m., despite the fact that the CastleGlenn Report did not study it, and IBI does not mention the word Friday in its report. All street parking and most of the surface parking lots are already full on a Friday night between 6-7 p.m. There are 23 OHL games on a Friday night. Where will people park?

(7) IBI says they have been told that "the City will establish a parking supply equilibrium" in the downtown core so that any parking lost by development will be replaced. But recent articles in the Whig Standard suggest there is no ability to create more surface parking in the downtown because the city has no land to develop parking. What are we to believe?

(8) IBI falls into the same trap of using London as an example of their so-called dispersed parking scheme. But London has 10,000 parking spots. There are 33 parking lots within 500 metres (the published and accepted maximum) of their arena, with very large lots and a parking garage nextdoor to the arena. The parking lots are laid out one right after the other in many cases, creating a giant parking lot right around the block on which the arena sits. IBI is comparing apples to apple blossoms.

In summary, IBI has unprofessionally wriggled its way around addressing any problems with this project. IBI is proposing a parking scenario that is clearly in uncharted waters. And the city and the taxpayers are left to resolve their own problems.

(9) IBI skirts the issue of daytime event impact by saying capacity events don't occur during the day. Well, we don't need any where near a capacity event to cause parking problems in the daytime downtown. We are all aware of the recent parking study which suggested ways of trying to ease the parking shortfalls in the downtown core. So, it takes only a couple of hundred people trying to find daytime parking to attend an event for the problem of parking to be exacerbated again and again.

(10) IBI had an excellent opportunity to tell the City what traffic would be like with a completed Wellington Street Extension, and/or with a 6000-seat arena (should the city decide to expand in 10 years or so), and/or use the 2026 scenario which the Transportation Master Plan used, to give the City an indication of what could confront them down the road. But IBI did none of these things to help us understand.

In summary, IBI has unprofessionally wriggled its way around addressing any problems with this project. IBI is proposing a parking scenario that is clearly in uncharted waters. And the city and the taxpayers are left to resolve their own problems.

Today The Whig reports on page 2 about a forthcoming KEDCO old-boys get-together to form a group to lobby City Hall.

Something, say, like this group? Except with traction. Right!

The Whig will presumably be there to partake in the luncheons, and dutifully report what is said.

No word whether stepping-up to LVEC fundraising responsibilities will be on the agenda.

In short, for this year:

• Zero sellouts, again. The Frontenacs have just one sellout in the past six seasons, a span that includes 211 regular-season and playoff games.
• Only 5 games with attendance over 2,500 this season. In the past five years, there have been only 16 games with attendance over 2,500, of which eight (or half) involve the Belleville Bulls and their busloads.
• There were 6 games with attendance below 2,000 this season.

The kicker in all this: the City of Kingston signed a 30-year LVEC deal with this chronically underachieving outfit.

And who would have done this? Click to read the whole deal.

On April 11th, unless the registration is renewed (it costs about $20), the "Watch Kingston Grow" internet property will dissapear, but not before a gauntlet of scam-artist takers.

Consider, for example, what happened to a related organization named "Friends of the Entertainment Centre" who let their internet domain lapse. Today the Friends' website, whose address is (was) FriendsOfTheEC.org, shills porn and internet scams.

Read more about how porn sites hijack expired internet domain names.

More about "Watch Kingston Grow":
* We've just updated our LVEC relationships diagram
* Kingston Accommodation Partners is behind the new pro-LVEC website
* Responding to the deceptive $50,000 pro-LVEC ad campaign:
It is being touted by a campaign so misleading it would never be approved to sell used cars or soap. -- Claude Scilley, Sports Editor, Whig Standard, May 27, 2006.

Click each image to see what's really behind each advert.

Glen Laubenstein reports to Council that it would cost an additional $150,000 and the assignment of additional personnel and consultants to support an audit of the LVEC project as moved by Councillor Gerretsen and seconded by Councillor Hutchison.

Moreover, so ridiculously tight are the project's finances that this additional 0.33% of the budget (one-third of one percent) would require a separate funding motion, further impeding the audit.

In order to support the audit, we will require additional staff or consulting services. Until the scope of this assignment is known, it is difficult to calculate a cost for such support; however it could be expected to be an additional $100,000 to $150,000 in direct project costs with funding from the Municipal Capital Reserve Fund.

Were the LVEC project properly managed, the planning and the documentation to support and execute this audit would already largely be in place. We suspect that much is hidden, that the paper trail is an absolute mess (on par, say, with project communications) and that all this is more the reason to go ahead with an aggressive audit of the LVEC project before it's too late, well before it becomes an exercise in forensics.

Elsewhere in LVEC-related documents, staff evidently has no intention of making public the agreement between The City and the Ontario Ministry of Health Promotion, which sees $4M worth of "health promoition" funds being funneled to the LVEC.

The legal agreement is approximately 50 pages in length including schedules. Full copies of the agreement will be provided to any member of Council by request through Lanie Hurdle, Director, Project Development.

Finally, some trivia

How many of Kingston's seven (7) Public Access Defibrillators are to be located in the LVEC? How many are to be found in Cook Brothers, Harold Harvey, and Wally Elmer arenas combined?

Answer: brace yourself: Two Public Access Defibrillators are supposed to go into the LVEC, and a total of zero for Cook Brothers, Harold Harvey, and Wally Elmer arenas.

The reported attendance for the Oshawa Generals plus the OHL vs Russia Challenge game on Nov 27th won 4-3 by the OHL before a reported attendance of 5655, is listed in the table.

Back on December 11 2006, we noted that Oshawa's new building just wasn't drawing in its first 10 matches.

They seem to have turned attendence around, though some of their numbers look dodgy. For example, the report of 6133 in attendence on Feb 18th, and 5747 on March 4th, appear suspect.

Oshawa is playing Kingston in this year's playoffs, and the attendance in Oshawa is reported as 4699 (March 23rd) and 4676 (March 27th). That would be 85% capacity on 5,500 seats.

Anyone watching Frontenacs playoff games on COGECO can plainly see all the empty seats in Oshawa. Apparently Oshawa does what Kingston does: report tickets sold, not the turnstile count, which is typically hundreds less.

These "no-shows" don't factor much in LVEC business plans.

Unless 500 ghosts wander downtown paying for parking and otherwise spending on typical LVEC event nights, taxpayers are on the hook for that, year in, year out.

One thing's not changed since we last looked: Non-hockey events programming in the General Motors Center continues to appear nothing like what's required to finance Kingston's LVEC.

Kingston's taxpayers shoulder ALL of that LVEC risk too, for the next 30 years.

In Saturday's Whig, this list of those who've won rights to luxury suites in Kingston's taxpayer-funded LVEC.

As you might expect, those who will lord-over the unwashed are a who's-who of Rosen-family businesses, overt Harvey Rosen backers, companies who do a lot of business with City Hall (including several members of the Kingston Home Builders Association and the Kingston Construction Association), and the usual old-media outfits who've been soft-selling the LVEC, to the point of flat-out misrepresenting it to taxpayers in print and on the air.

All these folks will potentially be hob-nobbing together about 100-events per year (or so we're told), largely paid-for with corporate tax breaks on these "business" expenses, with special parking, a private entrance, private concessions, and priority access to non-box event tickets whose leftovers will then be sold to the general public. More here on the LVEC's perks for the those in this class.

In alphabetical order:

1000 Islands Cruises (Same owners as KROCK)
1203157 Ontario Limited
J.E. Agnew Food Services Ltd. (Tim Hortons)
Braebury Homes Corporation
Canadian Tire - Cataraqui
CHUM Radio Kingston (FLY-FM)
CIBC Wood Gundy
Cruickshank Construction Limited and Rosen Heating Cooling
Empire Life Insurance Company
Gananoque Chevrolet Cadillac
JKL Micro
Kingston Financial Centre Inc.
Kingston MRI
Kimco Steel Sales Limited (owned in the Rosen family) and Kingston Truck Centre
The Kingston Frontenacs (owned by the Springer family)
The Kingston Whig-Standard
Kingston Young Entrepreneurs
KPMG LLP
Len Corcoran Excavating Ltd.
Melo Hotels
RBC WAGG
CaraCo Development Corporation and Taggart Investments
The Radio Group (K-Rock & KIX FM)
Thomson Jemmett Vogelzang o/b The Insurance Centre Inc.
Waste Management

George Hood, the man behind the disgraceful sellout of Kingston Market square, whose name was sold to the Springer family in perpetuity for less than one-sixth the cost of one single renovation, is pointing fingers and, apparently, quitting.

Who really killed municipal fundraising in Kingston?

Judge for yourself.

Bruce Todd penned this letter to the Editor of The Whig Standard, and widely copied to others. The Whig chose not to publish it, so here it is.

Where were you, Councillor Foster, when...

Indeed. Read the whole thing.

Councillor Foster's sudden concern for traffic on the Lasalle Causeway is a thinly-veiled farce. The Lasalle Causeway never factored into anything pushed by Councillor Foster in the past, including the LVEC.

A story today in The Whig about the LVEC's perks.

In today's Whig were two interesting letters.

Stepping out of the shadow of councils past by Rob Matheson, City councillor for Loyalist-Cataraqui district.

The second letter, from Catherine Ross, says Councillor cant have it both ways about Leonore Foster's curious priorities, and sudden unexpected concern for the Lasalle Causeway, whose traffic congestion never factored when it came to the LVEC.

A number of LVEC-related council documents have been posted on the City website in view of the March 20, 2007 Council meeting.

• In the agenda, again: Moved by Councillor Gerretsen seconded by Councillor Hutchison, to audit this LVEC freak show.

  At a prior meeting the decision to audit staff was deferred to staff.

  The predictable result? Staff is not keen on being audited for their work on the LVEC (see also here). More the reason to do it. If an audit is not done, then how else are Glen Laubenstein and Cynthia Beach to be held to account?

  In industry, their shenanigans (see the KPMG reports) would never be tolerated. They would both be history already.

  Taxpayers deserve the respect that accountability brings, and the auditees' cost estimates for doing so should not factor.

• Naming Rights Public Consultation: Agenda (page 7) and Report (page 30).

  The gyst of the recommendation: public influence on naming to be absolutely minimized.

• Project Status Reports for February 2007: Agenda (page 16) and Report (page 26). Therein:
  • Looking for drawings? Looking for a detailed list of milestones to come? A Gantt chart, maybe? A critical path? Maybe some sense that Staff are in control? You won't find any of that here.
  • Oops. The 1000 seats are looking to cost more than they thought.
  • A complete, total, shameful pussyfoot around noise issues.
  • The Risk Management Register is collated right side up, wrong side up, and sideways. Therein:
    • Get this: Reduction in lighting levels for the ice surface from 200-220 to 125 foot candles.
    • Read the whole Risk Management Register, upside down parts and all. For example, check out Staff's assessment of "The risk of Insufficient project funding is generated from fundraising and grants". Dreamland.

      It's pretty clear that City Staff is "mailing this in", as it were, and they are apparently still not interested in properly managing for risk. This whole exercise is scandalous in its implementation. Read it.

      Why would staff soft-sell the project risks? Probably because there are not yet any clear negative consequences of project mismanagement. There should be.

      How bad is this really? On a scale of 1-3, where 3 is likeliest, what in your estimation would be the "Risk that estimated operating revenues and costs are significantly different than actual"?

      City Staff scores this risk as a "1". Hands up if you buy this.

In summary there is much to read and digest here.

Here's more:

Staff's fourth LVEC Newsletter is online. Dated March 7th 2007, released March 14th, there's nothing in it.

Really, despite being a known issue for years now, project communucations continues to be lame.

Taxpayers haven't seen any revised drawings in months. Detailed drawings of the luxury suite level, from where taxpayers will be lorded-over by the LVEC's proponents, have never been seen.

There is still NOTHING concrete on the City Website about fundrasing, despite months notice of this requrement, and the obvious passing of any surge in interest that may have existed.

Could it be worse? Well, the next round of budget overruns is about due soon. Expect the cost of the proposed expansion to 6,000 seats to be significantly padded so they can cover other areas they'd rather not have to talk about.

That's just a hunch, you understand. We've all seen this movie before.

This is just a rumour, so beware. Word on the street is the new grocery store that is going to the new "big box" location at Dalton and Division Streets is Food Basics, the one that is presently located downtown adjacent to the LVEC construction site.

If this is true, then most signs indicate that if you thought you'd already seen a citizen's revolt over the LVEC and its proponents...

In other words, no telling how messy this could become.

Shadoe Davis is K-ROCK's morning man. He is also the only public spokesman for the Downtown Kingston BIA on the LVEC matter. If not him, then who else?

Read the whole thing.

How much public goodwill do you think the Downtown Kingston BIA has frittered away since April 2004 when this LVEC saga first began?

If you were the Downtown Kingston BIA, how dumb would you be to engage in a messy public LVEC blame-game long before the worse to come?

Hands up if you think this piece by Shadoe Davis makes fundraising for the LVEC any easier.

KCAL's regular readers might appreciate this: Consider that Mr Davis is in the media business.

Google "Shadoe Davis", including the quotes to exactly match the phrase.

Not lost in the shuffle of recent events is this February 26th Whig letter from Bill Beattie, KEDCO ex-President and CEO.

Therein, an oft-repeated beaut, followed by an extension of logic:

The economic benefits this project will bring have been conservatively estimated at $15 to $20 million per year. That is about a three-year payback of its cost to the community.

We'll soon see, won't we? But until then, what's behind this?

Bill Beattie was KEDCO boss in April 2005 when The KEDCO Report on the LVEC was released and thereafter widely cited to buttress the case for the LVEC.

Read what Stewart Fyfe wrote about the KEDCO report, and here is KCAL's item about the release of the KEDCO report, pointing some of its many omissions.

But there was never any real conversation about this keystone. The possibility that it may have been massively flawed never entered. KEDCO and the BIA bought a report telling them what they wanted to hear, and that's that, case closed.

In 2005, that is apparently all one needed to hijack the municipal agenda, raid the public purse, and make the taxpayer the guarantor of a 30-year debt for the sole benefit of those among us least in need.

Bill Beattie suddenly quit KEDCO in December 2005 after a year at his post. Less than a year after that, KEDCO was whipped during the municipal election campaign for, among other things, its performance, its evident and over-the-top Downtown Kingston BIA influence, its opacity, its blatant political partisanship, and KEDCO's obvious role in actively selling the LVEC to past City Council.

The KEDCO report, as far as we know, has never been updated.

Widespread concerns about its assumptions and omissions have never, ever, been acknowledged, nevermind addressed.

This doesn't stop LVEC proponents from quoting freely and often from the KEDCO report, complete with straight-faced pretense about its quality and its objective merits.

The City of Kingston has published this Request for Expressions of Interest for LVEC naming rights. This is also in The Whig. Note the closing date: March 31st.

Gordon has thoughts on the Memorial Cup blame game.

We know that Kingston's bid failed, and certainly would have failed, for a lot of reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with our current Council.

We can stop pretending otherwise, anytime now.

Remember this? This was bogus, and everybody knew it.

It's certainly bogus today. Could it be that public reckoning for bogus and inflated LVEC expectations is just now beginning?

Five of six teams in the running made the shortlist. The one city not making the shortlist: Kingston.

It is the opinion of the Memorial Cup site selection committee that five out of the six teams that applied to host the 2008 MasterCard Memorial Cup, have satisfactorily met all of the necessary criteria in order to be provided with an opportunity to make a formal bid presentation. The teams that will be presenting to the Memorial Cup site selection committee are the Kitchener Rangers, London Knights, Oshawa Generals, Saginaw Spirit and Sarnia Sting.

Update: Not making this up: CKWS-TV tries to pin it on Councillor Schmolka. Heh.

In The Whig today: Councillor Leonore Foster, LVEC champion, gets her comeuppance. Get used to it, Leonore.

Get a load of this:

"Keeping the money in the capital budget to start moving on this project is absolutely essential and will not impact on the tax rate," Foster said.

Right.

She also reportedly said:

"I have never been on a city council that is so parochial and so narrowly focused in its approach to this city as a whole."

See Leonore Foster's voting record on the past Council and decide for yourself.

Hey Taxpayer, want to download another LVEC non-report to Council by Cynthia Beach, Commissioner of Sustainability and Growth? Here it is: Fundraising Report for the Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre. It's three pages (two of them being cover pages) buried at the back of a 15-page document that, typically of Kingston, has no table of contents.

An Exhibit, Exhibit A - Final Report: Fundraising Strategic Plan for the Kingston Regional Sports & Entertainment Centre, is not online for the public. Project communications is apparently something that still needs improving.

Therein there's allusion to the hiring still more high-falutin' Toronto-based consultants. Apparently DVA Navion was retained on April 30,2006.

Funny, a search of the City of Kingston website for "DVA Navion" returns nothing prior to February 14, 2007, the very date of the snow-cancelled LVEC mea culpa briefing from Ms Beach and staff. Are you Surprised?

Back to Ms Beach's "report":

A fundraising advisory team was established to work with DVA Navion and included: Michael Davies, Alicia Gordon, Virginia Gordon and Marie Shales. The first meeting of the advisory team was held on May 23,2006.

Which, interestingly, is just four days prior to the release of 107 pages worth of reports amid drum-beating to sell our supine prior Council a $42M project to be approved just 3-days later. The pile of reports included, among other things, the Facility Operator agreement, selection of Ellis Don as builder, laughable (to KCAL) contingency, the agreement with the Frontenacs, $3M based on a wink and a smile from KAP, $3M from the BIA (which likely will be mostly escaped), the Feds promise which fell through, the civic misallocation of $4M from the Ontario Ministry of Health Promotion, and of course this $2M fudge called "Donations".

We know today (as we all suspected then) the degree to which all of this was being clumsily improvised, packaged, hyped, railroaded, and subsequently mis-managed and covered-up.

"Donations", recent Kingston municipal history teaches us, is code for: "another reckless taxpayer-covered bet", or "raise what you easily can, sell-out ethically if it makes things easier, and don't sweat the rest. Here are your framed certificates of appreciation anyways".

As for LVEC fundraising, apparently that hasn't advanced much in the nine months since. And really, why would it? In modern day Kingston evidently nobody is accountable for what they promise about this LVEC.

But it's really much worse than the nine months just lost. Recall that $2M from "Donations" was the ante back in September 2005 18 months ago, when this was a $37M project, and that amount has not been raised, literally or figuratively, since.

Today we know that $2M in "Donations" is chickenfeed compared to what should equitably be forthcoming by LVEC project movers and those so-called "partners" who stand to reap all the benefits. As such the $2M target, even if reached, would be a spectacular underachievement, but that won't stop the collegial blue-blooded self-congratulations that are sure to follow a "successful" minimum-required-effort campaign.

March 6, 2007 - Memorial Cup Site Selection Committee will announce a "short list" of teams to be considered to host the 2008 Memorial Cup.

Note: we've also seen that date elsewhere reported as March 7th.

Stay tuned.

Here's a roundup of the interesting LVEC-related opinions and updates from Councillor Bill Glover over on BillGlover.org.

• Bill Glover on LVEC cost increases: the well has run dry (February 27 2006)
• Bill Glover and the LVEC Motions
• LVEC challenges
• LVEC and costs in his January 27 report.

Read it.

The rule of thumb these days for a band the stature of say, Pearl Jam, Rod Stewart, The killers, Dixie Chicks et al. is they need a center that holds at least 6,0000 to be profitable and the amenities need to be fairly close to state of the art.

Oh really?

Let's quickly check the facts about recent activities of bands of "the stature of say, Pearl Jam, Rod Stewart, The killers, Dixie Chicks et al."

Here are Pearl Jam's 2006 dates (which we've preserved here) which clearly shows the sorts of venues they play. In Canada we're looking at venues like the Air Canada Centre in Toronto, more than triple the capacity of this LVEC.

Rod Stewart's Canadian and US Concert dates 2004-2005 Tour. Nine stops in seven Canadian Cities. The smallest Canadian venue is the John Labatt Centre in London, capacity 8,200 to 9,000 for an end stage concert, or 10,200 for a centre stage concert

The Killers 2007 tour dates (which we've preserved here). Nothing like 6,000-seat hockey bowls on this tour though they will play some of the more notable smaller concert halls, such as the Ryman Auditorium in Nashville, a 2,362-seat auditorium, once known as the one-time home of the Grand Ole Opry. So much for "state of the art". Canadian dates are all in large venues such as Montreal's Bell Centre and Toronto's Air Canada Centre.

The Dixie Chicks 2006 tour schedule (which we've preserved here), the smallest Canadian venue is, again, the John Labatt Centre in London.

Kingston is Canada's 26th largest urban area. In all the examples cited by Mr Davis, they very rarely go beyond the top-5, certainly never beyond the top 10 or top 15. A 6,000-seat arena is just never going consistently to draw acts like those Mr Davis claims to be so excited about.

Were that not enough, the LVEC's operator, Arcturus SMG, has managed to book (brace yourself) these exciting events at the Dow Events Center in Saginaw and all these exciting events at the Hershey Centre in Mississauga. Wow. Both venues are comparable to Kingston's LVEC, only bigger, with much larger catchment populations, and much better parking and accessibility stories.

Read what David Cliff has to say today about KCAL and its members. How insulting.

Consider, though, that Mr Cliff is (was) A.K.A. "Exhibitionist" on Kingston Electors before being unceremoniously tossed from there sometime last year. He's been back for a while, however, now posting as "Dogma" on Kingston Electors. He is also the self-proclaimed "LVEC Educated" blogger.

It's also notable that Mr Cliff runs a display stand business named Exhibit House. He is therefore among the very few who stand to gain handsomely from this taxpayer subsidized LVEC turkey.

Of course none of that is ever disclosed by Dogma, Exhibitionist, LVEC Educated, or whatever Mr Cliff calls himself now or next.

Moreover the business address of Exhibit House, at 427 Princess Street, is just outside the boundaries of the Downtown Kingston BIA, so he's not on the hook for any of the BIA levy that's supposed to help fund the LVEC.

We look forward to seeing Mr David Cliff's name figuring prominently among the five-figure dollar donors for the LVEC. Putting his money where his mouth is, as it were, and demonstrating that he's more than an anonymous profiteer of taxpayer largesse.

Don't miss the March 2007 Independent Voice article by Jamie Swift titled A revolting development - Big Rink boosters steam-roll over all objections to get it built.

After reviewing documents, Here is a list of apparent omissions from LVEC cost estimates.

In summary:

• Sound barrier system
• Sidewalks
• Post-event traffic control
• Illumination
• Traffic management at garages/lots
• Winter road and sidewalk maintenance
• Provision for bicycles
• Public Transit
• Traffic monitoring and implementation of improvements
• City Hall administration

Read the whole thing.

Read it.

Now compare that with this 1 minute and 52 second clip taken from around the 23-minute mark of the recording of Councillor Vicki Schmolka, Queen's Professor Ken Wong, and KROC's Shadoe Davis (30 Min 25 sec).

Shadoe Davis never let Councillor Vicki Schmolka answer the question, neither did he press his frankly pretentious claim to personally raise millions of dollars (the equivalent of several full United Way campaigns), and it was professor Ken Wong who changed the subject.

But don't take it from KCAL. Read it and hear it for yourself.

What's telling is: Mr Davis apparently sees LVEC fundraising by the Downtown business, which includes KROCK, as an optional activity. Actually, the project has nearly always had a $2M fundraising REQUIREMENT, and that's before we discuss the money that needs raising to meet part of the ever increasing shortfalls.

It's pretty clear today that Downtown Kingston isn't going to do anything unless it's forced to. The question is, will council supinely concede the only taxpayer-protecting hammer it's ever going to get?

Here are links to the materials KROCK 105 FM had online for their "LVEC rally".

• MP3: LVEC DEBATE - Vicki Schmolka (Kingston City Council), Ken Wong (Queen's University, School of Business), and Shadoe Davis
• MP3: G talking with Rob Baker about the LVEC Debate
• MP3: Coach's (Tim Cunningham) LVEC Comment. It might be helpful to know that the transcript of this is available in Coach Cunningham's new blog.

We've preserved copies.

We encourage all KCAL readers to download and listen to these MP3 audio files. Share them with friends.

And you do want to listen to these now, especially the recording of Councillor Vicki Schmolka, Queen's Professor Ken Wong, and KROC's Shadoe Davis.

The recording with Rob Baker is good too.

Listen to what is said, the numbers thrown about, the rationales espoused, what the arena will supposedly deliver to our community, where it really stands amid priorities, and who would be paying for it.

Listen carefully. Listen twice.

Also, here is a link to the KROCK online petition on iPetitions.com. At last glance there are 1,953 signatures, not all of them unique, and not all of them in support. But that's not bad as LVEC petitions go, real signatures or not.

To put the KROCK petition into perspective, the Marine Museum collected some 1,100 names in just 4 days in January '07 with essentially zero media coverage. Today the Marine Museun petition effort stands at over 1,300 signatures, which tells you, and hopefully tells Council, where simple quiet dignified waterfront things like the Marine Museum stand relative to the LVEC in our collective civic heart.

We can all agree on this: Currently far more people have long been mobilized to try and inject some sanity to the LVEC project than there are people mobilized and raising real money in support of it. Which is curious because not even the $2M "Donations" ante, which is a long-known REQUIREMENT, is being raised yet, nevermind millions more to cover the escallating shortfall.

The kicker: Shadoe seems to think raising millions of dollars is optional. Is Downtown Kingston caught pantless? Ad space again bought in lieu of stepping up to overdue and growing responsibilities?

Downtown Kingston! We're "mailing it in" because, so far, we still can.

The Whig published several LVEC-related letters on Saturday, of which we've clipped two, both from project boosters.

Carl Holmberg apparently doesn't like the way this multi-million dollar boondoggle is now being publicly discussed by Council.

The second letter is from Dave Morris, who apparently witnessed a wow-invoking display of raw competence by city staff last Tuesday evening.

Do you think we could make this stuff up? Decide for yourself.

KCAL has talked of premature bookings before. Here are some of the problem that come with premature bookings:

• Premature bookings can lead to rushed construction and death-march project management and execution, meaning that everything is more rushed, prone to error, prone to overtime charges, all of which is invariably more expensive.
• Premature bookings can reduce the negotiating power of the City. Suppliers know the city has limited time to source and negotiate for this project's needs. Time is clearly of the essence, and the city just cannot walk away. That's usually a terrible place from which to bargain.
• Premature bookings greatly increases the relative power of both trades relative to the contractors that employ them, and of contractors relative to the general contractor, and of the general contractor relative to the city.

Would it be that premature bookings make a more expensive building start losing money sooner?

The KCAL website is understandably seeing sharply increased volumes due to recent LVEC-related activities, and also because of last night's City Council meeting in which KCAL had a 10-minute delegation presentation.

If you are a new visitor, then welcome!

Once you are done, see also K7Waterfront.org which is dedicated to celebrating and watchdogging Kingston's waterfront. "K7" was created after the misguided attempt by Mayor Harvey Rosen to clobber a vibrant 70-employee boatbuilder and marina to put his taxpayer-subsidized family-occupied OHL arena on our waterfront. That almost succeeded, partly because Kingston's water-lovers were, at the time, mostly disorganized and unable to respond cohesively. Hopefully that's changing.

It's notable that there is no correction in Today's whig for yesterdays article by Brock Harrison and Steve Ladurantaye that wildly understated current LVEC costs and misrepresented the state of OHL franchise movements as part of its overtly partisan pro-project coverage.

Would Harvey Rosen be Mayor today had Staff, presumably pro-Harvey partisan staff, not buried this document until recently?

We know this for sure: Most of Council, with the notable exception of Ed Smith as usual, is rightfully upset about this. Stay tuned.

Here's a Kingston Chamber of Commerce email that's been circulating today.

Is the venerable Kingston Chamber of Commerce insinuating that municipal reserves aren't taxpayer or commonwealth assets? See also other Chamber LVEC shenanegans.

--- LVEC Update from the Chamber of Commerce ---

Kingston City Council meets tonight; councilors will discuss a motion By Vicki Schmolka and Bill Glover to cancel the LVEC already under construction. The public meeting starts at 7:15 pm at Kingston City Hall.

The project is expected to run about $4.3 million over the original budget. However, taxpayers will not be footing the bill for the additional costs if the project goes ahead. $4.3 million can be raised through municipal reserves, through operational revenue once the centre is running, and this money can also be debentured over the life of the project.

Cancelling the centre will cost, conservatively, $13.4 million, plus the $17 million that has already been spent on the project, plus anticipated law suits against the City of Kingston for reneging on the project. Costs for a scrapped project could be from $25 to $60 million. Any penalties levied on the city for cancellation would be payable by the taxpayer immediately. These costs could not be debentured over the life of the LVEC, since there would be no LVEC. A 1% increase in Kingstonians' taxes would only yield $1.5 million.

If you own a $200,000 home, your taxes would rise 16.6% to cover a $25 million debt; to cover a $60 million debt, your property taxes would rise 40%.

Without a new sports and entertainment centre, Kingston will also lose its OHL team, the Frontenacs, the chance to host the Memorial Cup, and numerous other opportunities that benefit the community and its quality of life.

As of 11:00 am this morning, there were over 1095 signatures at the K-Rock petition to city council to save the Entertainment Centre. You can sign the petition, and read the comments made by other people by following this link. www.krock1057.ca/station_info/morning_show.jsp

Email addresses for city councilors are also available on the K-Rock site. Let your councilors know how you feel about cancelling the LVEC.

There are several LVEC-related stories (here, here, and here) in The Whig today, and most of them appear riddled with grievous errors that really serve to cloud and skew the issue. For example:

• The Whig says the project involves $23 million of debt. In fact, it's now $30 Million.
• The Whig presents this as a $4.3M increase. It's $10M since September 2005, and $20M since the project's inception in 2004, and the project is expanding at a rate of $500,000 per month, not counting all that is omitted. And this is only the beginning.
• The Whig says $3.5 million is to come from reserves. In fact, it's just shy of $10 Million.
• The Whig says Niagara tried and failed to attract the Mississauga Ice Dogs. In fact, Eugene Melnyk (Ice Dogs Owner) bought the team and is currently looking for a city. Niagara turned him down, and Melnyk is still searching.

Memo to The Whig: Do your homework, okay? You're an embarassment to yourselves, and to this city.

Councillor Bill Glover shares his thoughts about tonight's meeting on his website.

Doug Springer apparently believes the taxpayers of Kingston owe him.

Eugene Melnyk's Mississauga Ice Dogs are shopping for a new home, and they've been a far better team than Mr Springers' in four out of the past five years, logging 34 playoff games, compared to Kingston's 11 playoff games in the same 5-year period.

In all respects, we can do way better than what Mr Springer currently brings.

Here's the latest scuttlebutt:

• Tuesday's Council Agenda has three strong and unequivocal motions:
  1. Councillor MacLeod-Kane, seconded by Councillor Garrison, puts the smelly fish squarely on the table.
  2. Councillor Schmolka, seconded by Councillor Glover, to bring the hammer down.
  3. Councillor Glover, seconded by Councillor Schmolka, to tighten the screws on staff.
• Today The Whig Standard publishes three items:
  1. Motion seeks to kill arena by Jordan Press.
  2. A very solid article by Ian Elliot, 'Spend at the beginning, save at the end', and
  3. Editorial: Cost over-run was predictable which is, um, perplexing and quite misses the whole point of all of the above.
• Yesterday CKWS-TV had two different segments, both only on the LVEC, missing the heart of the story.
• As the project gets larger, the risk falls disproportionately on taxpayers and commonwealth, and nearly not on the sole direct beneficiaries of LVEC, a story told in charts yesterday. Click for larger versions.

  

• Earlier this week the City released all these documents, which are also attached to Tuesday's Council Agenda. All this was to be openly discussed at a budget meeting which, unfortunately, had to be cancelled because of snowy weather.
  • Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre Risk Management Budget Update
  • KPMG Report (Exhibit A)
  • Summary Table: Risk Management (Exhibit B)
  • Risk Management Plan (Exhibit C)
  • Budget Update (Exhibit D)
  • January Progress Report. (Exhibit E)
  • Project Schedules (Exhibit F)
  • Project Charter (Exhibit G)
  • Credentials of Consultants (Exhibit H)
  • Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre Financial Summary
  • Financing With Federal Grant Funding (Sched A)
  • Financing Without Federal Grant Funding. (Sched B)
  • Capital Costs Relating To The Downtown Action Plan (North Block Area) And Kingston Regional Sports And Entertainment Centre
  • Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre Downtown Action Plan (North Block Area) Capital Costs Analysis (Exhibit A)
• On Tuesday KCAL posted Finding scratch for LVEC, suggesting modest resets in project burn and burn rate, all of which appears to be well outside the current plan's capability to adapt.
• Other recommended reading, were all the above not enough:

  The sweetheart deal with the Kingston Frontenacs
  City of Kingston's statement of taxpayer immunity
  KPMG exposes City staff weaknesses
  Bogus artificial deadlines
  Inadequate contingency
  The accessibility disgrace
  Deceitful project accounting
  Project documentation
  The Downtown Kingston power network
  The shrinking Downtown Kingston BIA
  Don Gedge's firing kept secret for 2 months (!)
  A glance at government funding
  Sarnia: not pretty
  Sault Ste Marie - 5,000 seats, $25M
  

There, now you're up to speed.

Judge for yourself.

Some other aspects of LVEC financing that, though they appear to not vary much with project cost, are nonetheless telling:

Updated: Download the data

It looks like there may be questionable tallies in the documents titled KRSEC Cash Flow Continuity - With Federal Grant Funding $4.0M (Schedule A) and KRSEC Cash Flow Continuity - Without Federal Grant Funding -$4.0M (Schedule B).

In these documents, present-value amounts in excess of $200,000 per year are supposedly forthcoming from the BIA levy over 32 years, and KAP each year over 33 years.

Yet, in the deal the BIA cut for itself for the LVEC, we're reading present-value amounts closer to $80,000 per year for the first 10 years, then $140,000 (in 2017 dollars) for the years 10 to 30. The same generally applies to the KAP numbers -- the flows are nominally different -- but nowhere near $200,000 per year for 30 years.

It should be interesting to hear how these numbers end up reading like they do, with the clearly wonky 32 and 33 year terms, in the latest (and so far only) cash flow projections we've seen in the nearly three years since day one.

Can somebody please explain this? comments@kcal.ca.

There's a lot to digest, and there will be a lot more to say, but in sumary here's what's striking in reading so far:

• $4.3M is the shortfall currently being admitted to.
• The many downtown infrastructure upgrades are not included in this number.
• We have ANOTHER damning KPMG report on City project management.
• So far no sign anywhere of the name belonging to the Teflon Man, City CEO Glen Laubenstein. Two women, Cynthia Beach and Lanie Hurdle, appear to be set-up for to take the fall.
• Cutting fat is, in reading so far, not presented as an option.

In a word: the city is in way over its head.

The Project Schedules (Exhibit F) is actually not a Project Schedule, but rather it's Arcturus SMG's work plan. It's a great document, and Arcturus sends all sorts of signals of flexibility -- no fixed dates anywhere -- but it's not a Project Schedule. It's Arcturus' Project Schedule. One quibble: it's clearly labeled "FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY - SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON ACTUAL CONDITIONS" and none of the materials sports a date nor a revision number. In other words, we're looking at a first-pass general template here.

The Risk Management Plan (Exhibit C) is atrocious. For one thing, it's a scanned image, so none of the text therein is selectable, nor searchable. When this project is officially investigated, this document won't be found by search methods. What's more, get this:

This says that, on a scale of 1-3, the risk of shortfall in fundraising and grants are as follows:
Likelihood (A): 2
Impact (B): 2
Risk Score: (C): A * B = 4
Control (D): 2
Residual Risk: C / D = 2

That's just dumb. Ridiculous. Who are they trying to kid? Moreover the control strategy they cite has mostly nothing to do with fundraising (donations) and grants.

All city projects in recent history suggest differently about "donations"
Likelihood (A): 3
Impact (B): 3
Risk Score: (C): A * B = 9
Control (D): 1
Residual Risk: C / D = 9

Really, heads should roll for the way LVEC risks have been overtly soft-pedalled and biased since day one.

Stay tuned. Last updated at 4:20 PM Feb 14th.

This diagram is from last September's IBI Transportation Study. That's *before* the current accessibility concerns, namely reserved bus and drop-off areas adjacent to the building, among others.

• User Pay
  • Additional ticket surcharges, including putting surcharges on the 300 tickets allocated to the Frontenacs that are currently surcharge-free for every OHL/CHL event for the next 30 years. Currently ticket surcharges for OHL games are planned at $1.50 per ticket, and $2.00 for other events. ; FYI, total attendance for all events is expected to be about 300,000 per year.

    Can you imagine a $2 surcharge on an $80 concert ticket? Who would be subsidizing whom, in this case?

  • Get way more from the luxury suites that supposedly attracted deposits like hotcakes.
• The Downtown Kingston BIA
  • Downtown Kingston's contribution is a paltry $85,000 per annum now and for the next few years.
  • Note: The BIA's "$3M" contribution is only so if you assume a discount rate at or below 4.57%. But the projects' debenture rate is 5.391%. Which makes the present value of the debt-supporting BIA LVEC Levy worth $340,672 less than the $3M credit commonly cited and officially tallied. That's a $340,672 shortfall, right there, before Downtown Kingston additionally steps forward for its fair share of this affair.
  • The BIA should be in for some extra millions right about now, because the BIA has a lot to answer for.
• The Kingston Frontenacs. ;
  • The agreement with the Frontenacs does not scale equitably with the cost of the project.
  • Currently the Frontenacs aren't due to pay any direct rent on the street-level retail store they are supposed to occupy for the next 30 years.
  • The Frontenacs 30-year complimentary luxury suite should be financed 100% by the Frontenacs. ; Moreover doing so should not, incidentally, be viewed as a "donation", which is a separate $2M figment of LVEC financing imagination.

    The agreement with the Frontenacs is outrageous. ; Read it.

• Cut or deferred features: For example:
  • Defer the installation of some, or all, the luxury suites. See Sault Ste-Marie.
  • Finance suite construction 100% privately.
  • At least cutback on the velour in the private suites.
  • The video scoreboard: plan to leapfrog current display technology, which is in flux and evolving rapidly. Bonus points if it is engineered and built it in Kingston. Install in, say, 2010.
  • Defer the flygrid, itemized since day one,
  • defer the construction of the Frontenacs' retail space, which they pay no direct rent on anyway,
  • defer the hall of fame,
  • defer the "cafe",
  • fewer finished, or more basic, concession stands,
  • accept living with lots of unfinished surfaces,
  • and so on.

  Since the outset there has been a fuzzily-guided LVEC "jewel" mentality, and that fat still hasn't been shed. The fat is just now being itemized, which is one reason why the project needs money.
   ;

• A delay in the opening date. The LVEC could be built over 18 or 24 months instead of 12 months. Consider this:
  • this reduces schedule pressure
  • no forced mad crush of downtown construction at the Causeway this summer, including the creation of an intersection at Ontario and Place D'Armes.
  • the interior can be built-out slowly,
    • with nobody tripping over anyone else,
    • with plenty of planning and oversight,
    • no panic,
    • with deals with suppliers negotiated over months, maybe several months, or years -- not like now, within weeks, with no exits, no possibility of walking away from anything. Ripe for the pickings.
    • and with an emphasis on using local labour, and local suppliers.
  • This time can be used to figure out
    • building accessibility,
    • the intersections and the real impact of the narrowed streets on event-day operational expenses.
    • the downtown sidewalk upgrades,
    • traffic flow, and the parking wayfinding story,
    • and the event-day traffic and transit control measures
    all given some thought before the opening.

  The building could open in July 2008 or 2009, and kinks worked out before a layer of sleet and snow is thrown into the whole situation. Bogus artificial deadlines are hurting this project, which is much larger in scope than anyone has been letting on.

More on the first of many LVEC cost overrun reports today in The Whig.

Take note: Today (February 12 2007) marks the first time our local daily, The Whig Standard, mentions the LVEC's inadequate contingency

CKWS-TV reports, wait for it, the first of surely many LVEC cost overruns.

KCAL asked the same thing on November 1, 2005.

Closely related: the Provincial Ministry of Health Promotion still doesn't publicly acknowledge its $4M LVEC association.

See for yourself:

A coincidence?

Maybe the Federal Government did due diligence (took a whiff, as it were) and, just like most Kingstonians, don't buy it. And why would they?

As for the "Ministry of Health Promotion" distancing? That could be damage control, for exactly the same reasons. Face it: the Downtown Kingston LVEC just doesn't pass the stink test.

The field is six: Kingston, Kitchener, London, Oshawa, Saginaw MI, and Sarnia.

Since the Memorial Cup is foremostly about bringing game, and (usually) the host city can expect a bye into the tournament, here's how they currently rank:

The the Memorial Cup is also about money. Here's how the six rank in terms of venue capacity:

Other factors:

• Three of the six cities have never hosted the Memorial Cup: Kingston, Sarnia, and Saginaw Michigan. Neither of these cities has ever qualified a contender for the Memorial Cup tournament.
• Oshawa has hosted the Memorial Cup just once, in 1987. Oshawa has qualified for the Memorial Cup tournament 11 times.
• Kitchener has hosted the Memorial Cup four times, most recently in 1984, and has participated in the tournament six times since 1923.
• London has hosted once in 2005, and doubtless makes a strong case to host it again.

One thing appears sure: Regardless of the winning bid city, the Kingston Frontenacs won't be playing in the tournament.

The selection committee is composed of:

• Paul Beeston, former CEO of major League Baseball,
• Frank Bonello, former Director of Central Scouting for the NHL,
• Brian O'Neill, Consultant for the NHL, and
• Jim Gregory, Senior V.P. of Hockey Operations for the NHL.

Today The Whig is running this LVEC article on the front page.

Read the whole thing.

The denial by Mayor Rosen and Cynthia Beach of deceitful project accounting and inadequate contingency is palpable.

David Branch, OHL Commissioner and the man who will eventually be announcing the Memorial Cup winning bid (the deadline for which, coincidentally, is today) has this to say about our spectacularly underachieving Kingston Frontenacs:

City of Kingston Staff, at the beheist of the Downtown Kingston power network, and without any public consultation whatsoever, has taxpayers engaged and on-the-hook in a 30-year sweetheart LVEC deal with this outfit.

There are two LVEC-related items on Tuesday's Council agenda.

• Naming Rights Guidelines for the Sports and Entertainment Centre and Multiplex.
• Kingston Regional Sports and Entertainment Centre Financial Summary - Interim Report which is a 5-page document that, incredibly, contains exactly nothing about LVEC financing, summary or otherwise.

In summary, in these two documents the residents of Kingston are being told to buy-in to the following things:

• Numerous upgrades to Downtown Kingston, most of them omitted from the project's budgets and financing, are required to make the building safely accessible to even healthy able adults, nevermind persons with disabilities.
• Parking lots up to 200m away will be upgraded for "barrier-free" access and, despite the distance, deemed "accessible".
• It will take 48 months (yes, 4 years) for some of these "upgrades", inadequate as they are, to be "feasible".

  (This smells like an odious attempt by staff to bury and defer costs that should be directly attributable to the LVEC as demanded by the current Council).

• The proposed lay-by and drop off locations for busses and Persons With Disabilities (PWD), nevermind everyone else, will further congest streets that are already to be significantly narrowed by the building. The narrowing of the LVEC's surrounding streets is omitted by the Kingston Regional Sports And Entertainment Centre transportation study even though this was clear from the design documents and models available at that time.
• Apparently, "The committee will provide direction to staff at a special meeting....Feb 9". There are no alternatives. There are no choices. What possible direction could be given? It's all a fait accompli now. To think that elderly ladies/men, and persons with disabilities, are to amble from across the street, up to a corner, wait for a light, then cross, then amble down the block to the door, all without the driver who brought them, is absolutely amazing.

To think that the City of Kingston not only accepted, but actively "pushed" an arena design that did not accommodate persons with disabilities, in 2006, is an absolute disgrace. Especially considering that this arena project (this "done deal" pushed by narrow Downtown interests) should be viewed as a 30-50 year proposition.

Concerns about accessibility for the Anglin Bay site date back to May 2005, and the North Block site is evidently worse in almost all respects.

The North Block Transportation Study claims 5% of patrons will be "dropped off" even though the data collected by a prior consultant at a Kingston OHL event suggests an 11% drop off rate. Regardless of the proportion of drop-offs, Bruce Todd wrote this in May 2005:

...We are told that 11% of the mode share of attendees would be dropped of and picked up after an event. This percentage was determined by the consultant from information gathered at the Memorial Centre site during an OHL game night.

Eleven percent of 5000 means that 526 people will arrive in 292 cars to be dropped off. After an event 292 cars will be trying to access the site against 5000 pedestrians and vehicles trying to leave the site. Where will these 292 cars stack up to await their passengers? THIS IS A MAJOR TRAFFIC CONCERN AND PLANNING COMMITTEE SHOULD HAVE A CLEAR ANSWER BEFORE ACCEPTING THIS REPORT (Ed: the Anglin Bay site traffic report, it should be noted, as flawed as it was, was deemed usable for the North Block site by those responsible for the LVEC).

292 cars represents a single line of cars about twenty blocks long. It would be almost equivalent to the entire contents of the Anglin Lot (182) and the OHIP Lot (about 160, allowing for reserved spaces, if they let us use it) sitting out on the street somewhere.

I cannot think of a reasonable place to stack up these 292 vehicles along any of the adjacent streets.

Just in time for the 2008 Memorial Cup bid deadline, which is Monday, February 5th.

Yesterday CKWS-TV reported that Kingston's major projects are not benefiting local labour.

WITH ALL THE NEW PROJECTS UNDERWAY IN KINGSTON -- FROM THE POLICE STATION TO THE LVEC -- YOU'D THINK THERE'D BE PLENTY OF JOBS UP FOR GRABS IN THE LOCAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY.

NOT SO -- ACCORDING TO LABOUR GROUPS.

Yeah. When we build it, construction workers will come. From out of town.

Stay tuned: the costs of Downtown Kingston upgrades, deceitfully omitted from LVEC project budgets so far, are coming to light.

The first of many, surely.

Fast forward to today, The Whig dutifully conveys the pretense that the public might have some say in the matter of the 4800 seats in the LVEC. According to the City of Kingston website, some seat samples are on a two-week tour of the city so the common folk can see them. How sweet.

The city would be well advised to pick the cheapest functional seating option possible.

It took less than a week for the Marine Museum to far surpass the number of backers the "Friends of the Entertainment Centre" (link is not work-safe) collected online over a full year. Recall, moreover, that the Friends' were aided by the support of local celebrities and very sympathetic, overtly sycophantic coverage in some cases, from all the local mainstream media outlets.

By early Tuesday evening, the Marine Museum had cllected almost 900 non-"anonymous" names in support. By contrast, the Friends of the Entertainment Centre collected little more than 750 voting-age names over a full year.

(Note that the Friends of the Entertainment Centre apparently couldn't muster the will and the $20 it would have taken to keep their website online; their ownership of the domain lapsed, and today it's run by cyber squatters, purveyors of porn, amazing medicines, and other sortid content.)

Earlier this week we reported that the Marine Museum collected more names in 3-days than the "Youth of Kingston Support The LVEC" collected over more than two years.

It's unfortunately looking like the LVEC has all the makings of becoming the biggest and most expensive con-job in Kingston's considerable history.

Today The Whig reports predictable pushback from Mayor Rosen and Staff about more honest cost appraisal, and the tax impacts, of the LVEC.

Apparently Mayor Rosen and Staff don't yet "get" that the gig is up.

Once Mayor Rosen awakes, the question is: what will Downtown Kingston pay, and what will it forego, for its fair share of the project's burden? In the end, whether measured in dollars, or of its honour and goodwill that has already begun ebbing, downtown Kingston will pay for its share of the LVEC.

It's hard to imagine a worse outcome for Downtown Kingston than the continued erosion of its goodwill. Taxpayers, remember, have been repeatedly told that they are not on the hook. Something must give. Stalling, as Mayor Rosen is doing, simply means that the general resentment of Downtown Kingston will continue to grow, and worse, without diminishing the financial inequity that's becoming increasingly obvious.

Recall that before all this, Downtown Kingston was supposedly vibrant and successful, and not in need of "fixing", certainly not like this. The Mayor ignores these unintended consequences at the peril of Downtown Kingston and, by extension, the city as a whole.

The naming rights process for BOTH the LVEC and the Multiplex, and city naming rights policy in general, are the subject of this 56-page report by Wakeham & Associates of Toronto (also New York and Los Angeles) that will be presented to Council on Tuesday.

It's interesting reading.

First, know that the creaky LVEC business plan anticipated $150,000 per year in revenue from naming rights, and that naming rights are one of the few revenue-sources whose fruit is not split with the Frontenacs ( Click here to read the agreement with the Frontenacs, already consummated).

Some observations:

• This middleman-produced report has a 15% yearly middleman fee built-in. Staff is recommending the City should just roll-over and agree to pay more than $20,000 per year to the naming-rights middleman based in Toronto, New York, and Los Angeles. Over the 30-year life of the LVEC's debt, that's several hundred thousand dollars. People: it's 2007; the whole global economy is restructuring itself, and it's all about eliminating middlemen.
• The report could be described as "monetizing everything", so it's not just about the building's name. Translation: If this is successful, expect the LVEC to be hyper-marketed. You're a walking wallet, and every marketing opportunity is useful, your senses be damned, Corel Centre-style. Er, sorry, Scotiabank Place-style.
• There appears to be little advice in the report that can't readily be found at http://www.NamingRightsOnline.com or otherwise Googled.
• There is some acknowledgement of the relationship between naming rights, facility marketing, and "Donations", which are supposed to provide $2M in additional LVEC financing. The report conveys a sense of an explicit downgrade in the expectations of donors in deference to marketing programmes. You see, benefits to donors (all forms of recognition and acknowledgement) are really just drawn from the limited supply of marketing exposure opportunities. Search for "donation" throughout the document, it's informative.

  

• Of course, there's no acknowledgment that this LVEC's brand is already soiled. No, all is rosen. For example, on page 12 we learn:
  .

  Evidently Wakeham & Associates Marketing Inc. haven't done much quality fieldwork in scouting Kingston for the pickings.

• Wait for it: up-front and operational costs related to this are never mentioned in the business plan. ( Page 24)
  
• A Wakeham & Associates moment ( page 30): let's concoct educational programs, and then charge schools to tour the facility, and expose the kids to our marketing program!
  .

  Dude, it's a hockey rink.

• How rosy is the middleman's outlook? Get this ( page 39):
  .

  That's three times the value imagined in the business plan, three and a third times the amount raised in Sault-Ste Marie from a local brewery, and not much less than amount commanded by the 9,000-seat John Labatt Centre. How marvelous!

• There's no sense of the risk that the rights will find no takers. In this report, there are only successful rights sales. In reality, only seven of twenty OHL venues have commercially named buildings (Oshawa GM Centre, Mississauga Hershey Centre, Brampton Powerade Centre, Barrie Molson Centre, London John Labatt Centre, Sault Ste. Marie Steelback Centre, Plymouth Compuware Sports Arena, Saginaw Dow Event Center. [Ed: Any others?] and two brand new "entertainment centres" in Sarnia and Guelph have not yet sold their naming rights.

One thing is clear: the City of Kingston hereby admits that it is incapable of naming this turkey, to the point now that we must ship all this marketing money out of town, just like they've already agreed to do with the facility builders, the facility operators and, of course, like we'll do with almost all the performers. Kingston failed to sell the building to the public, and they've admitted utter failure to sell it to corporations.

Taxpayers are such pushovers.

This upcoming motion by Councillor Glover, seconded by councillor Matheson, finally begins to address the LVEC's inadequate contingency and the bogus City of Kingston statement of taxpayer immunity.

Here's the text in Council Agenda; click it to open the original PDF file at page 15.

Staff should probably explain why anything they reply is nowhere to be found in staff's insipid assessment of why the project should not be de-railed, or should that be, "de-railroaded"?

It's most interesting that in just three days, the Marine Museum online petition already has 50% more signatures than the The Youth of Kingston Support LVEC online petition acquired over a period of two years from a supposedly ultra-"wired" target audience.

Moreover the Marine Museum's tally isn't padded by the large proportion of bogus entries we can see in the Youth of Kingston support the LVEC petition.

Recall that in August and September 2005, KCAL collected a total of over 4,000 actual signatures opposing the LVEC on Anglin Bay.

You'd think City Staff would have gotten the hint: you tamper with our waterfront at your peril.

Apparently the Downtown Kingston BIA's LVEC missed out on the last of the three intakes for COMRIF funding.

Looking at the list of projects that were funded, $46M to 72 communities, nothing like luxury-box containing sport palaces is anywhere to be found. It's mostly all about bridge repair and replacement, and road reconstruction.

We expressed doubts about COMRIF back on October 14, 2005, but its vast improbability never stopped LVEC proponents from bandishing this among all their other fabrications.

At the Tuesday, January 9, 2007 Council meeting, a motion will be considered to address some clear omissions in the scope of the LVEC / KRSEC project.

.

No word yet on when the project will have a realistic contingency. With this motion, the measly contingency is blown several times over, and arena construction is not yet beyond grade level. That money needs to be raised. Where is that going to come from? Taxpayers, or the project's wealthy, land-rich proponents and beneficiaries? Where's the money?

Remember this City staff statement from June 2006?

Harvey Rosen's real legacy to the City of Kingston won't be the LVEC, but rather forthcoming new conflict of interest guidelines that should ensure that his family-centric shenanegans, of which the LVEC fiasco is just one of several glaring examples, won't be repeated.

There's hope too that the new guidelines might prevent Downtown Kingston from manipulating the civic agenda and, more to the point, compel people to disclose their veiled interests at public meetings. Never again should Kingston be subject to the pretense of public consultation with staged public meetings.

The April 25 2005 LVEC "Have Your Say" public meeting, for example:

• was really about a massive BIA subsity and clobbering a marina and our only working waterfront (LVEC on Anglin Bay),
• the meeting was located in the heart of the BIA area (City Hall).
• The meeting was called, chaired, and controlled by a member of the BIA Board of Directors (Ed Smith) who...
• ...less than 12 hours later, as chairman of the somnolent LVEC Steering Committee, rubber-stamped pre-determined recommendations forwarded to Council which included no acknowledgement whatsoever, not a word, of widespread public concerns about the whole project, nevermind just its original waterfront site.

Really, it's hard to imagine that this sort of slimeball local politics will still be legal a short time hence.

Consider all the taxpayer-funded resources being thrown at the LVEC:

• Start with the 30-year financial commitment, plus
• holding a 30-year loan for the BIA on phantasmagoric terms, plus
• holding the bag for a collateral-free $3M promise from a largely asset-less loose affiliation (KAP), plus
• holding the bag for $2M in so-called expected "donations", plus
• essentially 100% of the cost overrun and operations underperformance exposure, plus
• the hidden costs of required upgrades to Downtown, plus
• City staff time, plus
• consultants, plus
• all the time and money blindly and prematurely wasted on Anglin Bay, plus
• all the opportunity cost.

Count everyone and everything that's being paid with real budgets. Add to all that the considerable sum, perhaps a generation's-worth, of public goodwill and political influence frittered-away by the Downtown Kingston BIA and their KEDCO operatives.

With all those resources there was apparently no plan to ensure and preserve the value of the arena's brand. You'd think the building's good name, its personality, and its promise probably should have counted for something. So far it doesn't look that way. This much we know: Kingston's LVEC needs a complete brand makeover, assuming anything remains salvageable at this point.

Take one aspect of the LVEC's brand: it's name. The original name "LVEC" was replaced with variations and expansions of "KRSEC" at some fuzzy point in the past. No official notice of the name change was ever made. Today the terms "LVEC" and "KRSEC" and their expansions are used interchangeably. The project is, if anything, identity ambiguous.

If that's not changed, now and in the future, people searching for "LVEC" on the City website will never get the whole picture. (How convenient). From here it gets worse: the naming rights are supposed to be sold to a corporation, and we're all supposed to again swap the buiding's identity, and that's supposed to be worth, we're told, $125,000 per year essentially forever. The further obfuscation the LVEC's Google-vitae is, presumably, priceless.

It's not clear how the sale of the LVEC's naming rights is going. How bad could it be? Guelph, for example, has been unable, since its opening in year 2000 and including the 2002 Memorial Cup, to sell the naming rights to what is still known today as the Guelph Sports & Entertainment Centre.

So far it certainly looks like whoever buys the LVEC's naming rights will be attaching themselves to tainted goods.

The LVEC namer will be risking its brand on an unpopular building, funded mostly by disgruntled taxpayers, rammed through by apparent deceit and flat-out misrepresentations, including the triumphant reading of promises of Federal cash by Mayor Rosen moments before the fateful Council vote that turned out to be bogus (which, by the way, has never been publicly acknowledged), leading to still more malappropriated KEDCO resources. Then there are many other shenanegans here and here and here and here to list just a few.

There's more: the building is shoehorned in a sub-optimal location, it's still not legally "accessible", and it's supposed to be faithfully attended by "walking wallets" for whom consideration of convenience or preference simply never entered the "planning" discourse. The building will be occupied by a chronically underachieving OHL team, the very same people who stand to benefit most from the venture who have, moreover, a 30-year carte blanche 24/7/365 run of the whole building including rent-free street-level retail space, and a guaranteed monopoly on high-level hockey in Kingston, all for a wink and a smile up-front.

Certainly the Springer family has no exposure to financial risks of the building's construction and operation. That part is borne entirely by the already under-served and notably not-wealthy taxpayers of Kingston. The Frontenacs and their ownership are the weakest link in this whole dodgy project which, considering all its other stinky aspects, is really saying something.

Even the Frontenacs fan base appears pissed at the whole situation. The building may be going forward, but we've probably not seen the worst of it yet.

But it's not just about naming rights:

• $2M is supposed to come from "donations", from people who are supposed to be comfortable attaching their good names and part of vaster fortunes to the LVEC. We wonder just who, in the end, that might have to be.
• Long term, night after night, in all weather, Kingstonians are supposed to get into their cars and treck downtown, pay to park at some distance, then walk on narrow sidewalks regardless of the elements, enter with surcharged tickets, be captive to on-site concessions, and be lorded-over by the peple who engineered the whole scam from their private luxury suites, all while watching crappy hockey or the sort of entertainment that tends to play in smallish hockey bowls like these stellar events in Mississauga, or Oshawa, or Sault Ste-Marie, or (get a load of this) Guelph.

The City of Kingston has released it's second LVEC "monthly update".

Update: Apparently David Cliff cannot read. Timelines? Pedestrian walks? Long term planning alternatives? Where?

Kingston's 30-year LVEC debt is secured by a wink and a smile from the BIA, Kingston Accommodation Partners, and nameless sources of "Donations". The full balance of that, plus the operations income they predict, plus the walking wallet spinoffs, is supposed to come from the very people that are being fiscally abused by the project, and who know it.

The suckers, so it's believed, will just show up, night after night, and are to accept paying for parking, then walking far in all weather, enter with surcharged tickets, be captive to on-site concessions, to then be lorded over by those same project proponents from above in private luxury suites, all watcing crappy hockey or the sort of entertainment that tends to play in smallish hockey bowls.

On a municipal per-capita cost basis, even if you only count the LVEC building and ignore all the downtown improvements required, the cost of Harvey Rosen's LVEC spread over 140,000 people is absolutely comparable (if not greater) to the $1 billion cost of the Olympic Stadium spread over the 3.4 million population of Montreal.

One difference: the feds supported Montreal with, among other things, Olympic coin and Olympic lottery programs, and the Province of Quebec supported Montreal with a special 30-year tax on cigarettes.

Do the math.

On a per-capita basis, Kingston's LVEC is far more expensive than Toronto's $570 Million Skydome, and Skydome, built in 1989 (17 years ago), is today mortgage free.

It turns out neither Olympic Stadium nor Skydome are anything like engines of economic growth for their communities.

Like LVEC is touted, both Olympic Stadium and Skydome were "state of the art facilities", an attribute it was believed would assure long term benefits.

Today's Whig editorial bemoans that the "big rink" has shrunk.

If this information worried anyone, it should have been a concern months ago, when the original task force recommendation -- for a facility of between 6,000 and 6,500 seats -- shrank after the proposed site changed from Anglin Bay to Place D'Armes.